| Literature DB >> 32351488 |
Sandrine Trudeau1, Alexandre Thibodeau1,2, Jean-Charles Côté1, Marie-Lou Gaucher1,2, Philippe Fravalo1,2,3.
Abstract
In broiler chicken production, microbial populations on the eggshell surface following oviposition are still poorly characterized, though they may significantly impact both poultry and public health. The aim of this study was to describe the microbiota of both broiler breeder hens' feces and the surface of their eggs to assess the contribution of the parental fecal microbiota to the eggshell microbiota. A total of twelve breeder flocks in Quebec, Canada, were sampled at two different times, and a total of 940 feces and 16,400 egg surface samples were recovered. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we showed that even if the microbiota of both feces and eggshells were mainly composed of the phyla Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, the bacterial community compositions and structures differed between both types of samples. Our results also showed that both the sampling time and the flock identity significantly influenced the alpha- and the beta-diversities of the studied microbiomes. Using a Venn diagram, we showed that 1790 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were shared between feces and eggshell samples. Sequences associated with genera of potentially pathogenic and spoilage bacteria, Acinetobacter, Campylobacter, Escherichia/Shigella, Helicobacter, Listeria, Proteus, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, and Staphylococcus, were shared between sample types. Some OTUs highly represented in the fecal microbiota and associated with Lactobacillus and Streptococcus genera, were absent from eggshells, suggesting a selection during the microbiota transfer and/or the potential role of environmental contamination. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study using 16S rRNA sequencing to describe the contribution of the transfer from the fecal microbial ecosystem of laying breeder hens to the establishment of the microbiota on the surface of laid eggs, as well as the bacterial communities at both the broiler breeder feces and the eggshell levels.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; animal health; bacterial transfer; broiler breeders; eggshell microbiota; fecal microbiota; public health
Year: 2020 PMID: 32351488 PMCID: PMC7176364 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00666
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Stacked-bar chart illustrating the major phyla (relative abundance > 1% of total microbiota) found in (A) feces, and (B) eggshell samples, according to the Silva and RDP databases.
FIGURE 2Stacked-bar chart illustrating the major families (relative abundance > 1% of total microbiota) found in (A) feces, and (B) eggshell samples, according to the Silva and RDP databases.
Distribution of potential pathogens and spoilage bacterial genera found in the feces and on the eggshells according to the RDP database.
| Bacterial genera | Type1 | Positive flocks (%) | Positive samples (%) | Relative abundance (%) | |||
| Feces | Eggshells | Feces | Eggshells | Feces | Eggshells | ||
| S | 92 | 100 | 43 | 87 | 2.5 × 10–2 | 1.7 × 100 | |
| P | 25 | 75 | 5 | 8 | 2.4 × 10–4 | 1.2 × 10–2 | |
| P | 100 | 100 | 88 | 22 | 2.9 × 10–2 | 4.2 × 10–2 | |
| P | 100 | 83 | 66 | 15 | 1.7 × 10–2 | 2.2 × 10–2 | |
| P | 33 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 2.2 × 10–4 | 9.7 × 10–4 | |
| P, S | 58 | 83 | 12 | 10 | 3.1 × 10–4 | 1.3 × 10–2 | |
| S | 100 | 100 | 40 | 75 | 2.0 × 10–2 | 3.1 × 10–1 | |
| P | 17 | 25 | 2 | 3 | 3.4 × 10–5 | 6.3 × 10–3 | |
| P | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 9.9 × 10–1 | 8.6 × 10–1 | |
Comparison of alpha-diversity indices of feces and eggshells across broiler breeder flocks according to the time and the flock.
| Broiler breeder groups | Feces | Eggshells | ||||
| Sobs | Inverse Simpson’s | Shannon even | Sobs | Inverse Simpson’s | Shannon even | |
| Flock 1 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 748 | 11 | 0.50 | 207 | 51 | 0.86 |
| Flock 2 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 12 | 0.51 | 173 | 13 | 0.71 | |
| Flock 3 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 893 | 15 | 0.50 | 235 | ||
| Flock 4 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 908 | 16 | 0.53 | 219 | 62 | 0.88 |
| Flock 5 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 17 | 0.52 | 65 | |||
| Flock 6 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 880 | 18 | 0.53 | |||
| Flock 7 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 825 | 16 | 0.51 | 240 | 85 | 0.90 |
| Flock 8 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 740 | 11 | 0.48 | 246 | 105 | 0.92 |
| Flock 9 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 658 | 12 | 0.47 | 253 | 89 | 0.91 |
| Flock 10 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 794 | 13 | 0.50 | 276 | 97 | 0.91 |
| Flock 11 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 719 | 11 | 0.47 | 207 | 36 | 0.77 |
| Flock 12 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 786 | 14 | 0.50 | 251 | 80 | 0.88 |
| All Flocks Day 0 vs. 4 weeks* | 806* | 14* | 0.50* | 230* | 0.86* | |
| All Flocks1** | 0.09** | 0.2** | 0.5** | |||
Microbiota structure comparison of feces and eggshells across broiler breeder flocks according to the time and the flock.
| Compared groups | AMOVA ( | |||
| Feces | Eggshells | |||
| Jaccard | Yue & Clayton | Jaccard | Yue & Clayton | |
| Flock 1 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.066 | 0.786 | ||
| Flock 2 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.035 | 0.074 | 0.484 | |
| Flock 3 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.14 | |||
| Flock 4 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | ||||
| Flock 5 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.287 | 0.609 | ||
| Flock 6 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.229 | |||
| Flock 7 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | ||||
| Flock 8 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | ||||
| Flock 9 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.096 | |||
| Flock 10 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | ||||
| Flock 11 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.068 | |||
| Flock 12 Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.382 | 0.368 | ||
| All Flocks Day 0 vs. 4 weeks | 0.86 | |||
| All Flocks1* | ||||
| All flocks feces vs. eggshells | ||||
FIGURE 3Examples of the 2-dimensions NMDS plots using Jaccard distances matrices to compare (A) broiler breeder fecal microbiota beta-diversity according to the time of sampling, Day 0 and 4 weeks; (B) eggshell microbiota beta-diversity according to the time of sampling, Day 0 and 4 weeks; and (C) overall microbiota according to the sample type, eggshell, and feces.
FIGURE 4Comparison of the broiler breeder fecal microbiota and eggshell microbiota using LEfSe. Histogram of the LDA scores for significantly differentially abundant biomarkers among groups (LDA Score [log 10] > 4). Red = feces and Blue = eggshells.
FIGURE 5Venn diagram showing the shared OTUs by groups. The groups compared were: (i) eggshells at Day 0 of the study; (ii) eggshells 4 weeks after; (iii) feces at Day 0 of the study; (iv) and feces 4 weeks after.
Percentage of flocks for which genus sequence 1 were detected * on both eggshells and feces samples, and for which genus sequence 1 were detected * on the eggshells but that were absent in feces.
| Flock (%) | |||
| Genus sequence | Type2 | Eggshells+/Feces+ | Eggshells+/Feces− |
| S | 92 | 8 | |
| P | 17 | 58 | |
| P | 100 | 0 | |
| P | 83 | 0 | |
| P | 8 | 8 | |
| P, S | 50 | 33 | |
| S | 100 | 0 | |
| P | 8 | 17 | |
| P | 100 | 0 | |