| Literature DB >> 32351483 |
Haipeng Guo1,2, Lei Huang1,2, Songtao Hu1,2, Chen Chen3, Xiaolin Huang3, Wei Liu1,2, Sipeng Wang1,2, Yueyue Zhu1,2, Yueji Zhao1,2, Demin Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Increasing the C/N ratio of input feed has been reported as a practical approach for improvingEntities:
Keywords: C/N ratio; biofloc formation; intestinal metabolome; intestinal microbiota; shrimp
Year: 2020 PMID: 32351483 PMCID: PMC7176362 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00652
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1The length and weight of shrimp individuals (A) and bioflocs (B) volume in different experiment groups (CN6, CN10, and CN15) after 11 and 17 days of experiment. Data present means ± deviation (n = 10). Different lowercase letters on the histogram indicate significant difference (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05).
FIGURE 2(A) Differences in intestinal microbial α-diversity indexes among the four groups. Different lowercase letters on the histogram indicate significant difference (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05); (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) visualized the differences of intestinal microbial community structure among different groups; (C) Relative abundances of the dominant bacterial families (relative abundance >5%) in the shrimp intestines.
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was used to test the differences of shrimp gut microbiota among different groups (999 permutations).
| F | ||
| Ori vs. CN6 | 17.539 | 0.014 |
| Ori vs. CN10 | 10.858 | 0.009 |
| Ori vs. CN15 | 27.045 | 0.012 |
| CN6 vs. CN10 | 4.060 | 0.010 |
| CN6 vs. CN115 | 10.526 | 0.012 |
| CN10 vs. CN115 | 2.961 | 0.008 |
FIGURE 3Heatmap summarizing the relative abundance of the top 40 abundant OTUs in the intestine of L. vannamei. Microbial abundance was scaled with log transformation in the heatmap. The OTUs were organized by their phylogenetic positions; the taxa of OTUs are shown on the right. 1, cluster 1 indicating that the abundance was the highest in the group Ori (Day 0); 2, cluster 2 indicating that the abundance was increased in the group CN10, CN15 or both of them, compared to that in the group CN6; 3, cluster 3 indicating that the abundance was decreased in the group CN10, CN15 or both of them, compared to that in the group CN6.
FIGURE 4The significantly improved OTUs in average relative abundance at the CN10 and CN15 compared to the CN6. The detailed information of indicator taxa (OTUs) was showed in Supplementary Table S1. Values represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 5). Bars with different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests.
FIGURE 5The significantly reduced OTUs in average relative abundance at the CN10 and CN15 compared to the CN6. The detailed information of indicator taxa (OTUs) was showed in Supplementary Table S1. Values represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 5). Bars with different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests.
FIGURE 6(A) Venn diagram analysis of differential metabolites screened by multidimensional analysis (OPLS-DA) among different groups; (B) Principal component analysis of the gut metabolome.
FIGURE 7Heatmap was applied to visualize the differences in the composition of metabolites among different groups. (A) Metabolites mainly related to benzene, phenols and indoles; (B) Metabolites mainly related to polyketides and prenol lipids. Microbial metabolite concentration was scaled with log transformation in the heatmap. 1, cluster 1 represents a significant down-regulated at CN10 and CN15, compared to those at CN6; 2, cluster 2 represents a slightly up-regulated at CN10 and a significantly increased at CN15, compared to those at CN6; 3, cluster 3 represents those with low concentrations in the groups Ori (Day 0) and CN6, but they have high concentrations in the groups CN10 or CN15.
FIGURE 8Co-occurrence network depend on the Pearson correlation characterizes the significant correlations between differential OTUs (Figure 3) and differential metabolites (Figure 7) in shrimp intestines. The OTUs underlined in black color belong to the Cluster 3 in Figure 3; the metabolites underlined in red color belong to the Cluster 1 in the Figure 7.