Aditi Vasan1,2, Chén C Kenyon2,3, Deepak Palakshappa4. 1. National Clinician Scholars Program and vasana@email.chop.edu. 2. PolicyLab and Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Division of Public Health Sciences and Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all pediatricians screen for social determinants of health to identify families in need and connect them to available resources. We examined pediatric residents' screening practices for social needs in different clinical settings and explored the influence of electronic health record (EHR) prompts on screening. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, pediatric residents participated in a brief electronic survey assessing (1) screening practices for unmet social needs and (2) perceived barriers to and facilitators of routine screening in the inpatient and outpatient settings. The differences in screening by care setting were assessed by using Fisher's exact test. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine the association between EHR prompts and resident screening practices. RESULTS: Ninety-two pediatric residents (64% of the residency program) responded to the survey. Respondents reported significantly higher rates of social needs screening in the outpatient as compared with the inpatient setting (98% vs 37%; P < .001). Residents cited time constraints, lack of knowledge about available resources, and discomfort with screening questions as barriers to screening in both settings. Residents were more likely to screen for social needs when screening questions were embedded in the EHR (odds ratio = 9.6; 95% confidence interval: 6.7-13.9). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents were more likely to screen for unmet social needs in the outpatient than in the inpatient setting despite reporting similar barriers to screening in both settings. EHR-based social needs screening templates could be used to increase rates of screening and reach additional families in need.
OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all pediatricians screen for social determinants of health to identify families in need and connect them to available resources. We examined pediatric residents' screening practices for social needs in different clinical settings and explored the influence of electronic health record (EHR) prompts on screening. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, pediatric residents participated in a brief electronic survey assessing (1) screening practices for unmet social needs and (2) perceived barriers to and facilitators of routine screening in the inpatient and outpatient settings. The differences in screening by care setting were assessed by using Fisher's exact test. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine the association between EHR prompts and resident screening practices. RESULTS: Ninety-two pediatric residents (64% of the residency program) responded to the survey. Respondents reported significantly higher rates of social needs screening in the outpatient as compared with the inpatient setting (98% vs 37%; P < .001). Residents cited time constraints, lack of knowledge about available resources, and discomfort with screening questions as barriers to screening in both settings. Residents were more likely to screen for social needs when screening questions were embedded in the EHR (odds ratio = 9.6; 95% confidence interval: 6.7-13.9). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents were more likely to screen for unmet social needs in the outpatient than in the inpatient setting despite reporting similar barriers to screening in both settings. EHR-based social needs screening templates could be used to increase rates of screening and reach additional families in need.
Authors: Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Melissa D Klein; Robert S Kahn; Raymond C Baker; Elaine E Fink; Donita S Parrish; Deanna C White Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Mitesh S Patel; Susan C Day; Scott D Halpern; C William Hanson; Joseph R Martinez; Steven Honeywell; Kevin G Volpp Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Ruth Rose-Jacobs; Maureen M Black; Patrick H Casey; John T Cook; Diana B Cutts; Mariana Chilton; Timothy Heeren; Suzette M Levenson; Alan F Meyers; Deborah A Frank Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Chloe R Drennen; Sharon M Coleman; Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba; Deborah A Frank; Mariana Chilton; John T Cook; Diana B Cutts; Timothy Heeren; Patrick H Casey; Maureen M Black Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Margaret G Parker; Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba; Lindsey J Rateau; Megan T Sandel; Deborah A Frank; Diana B Cutts; Timothy C Heeren; Félice Lê-Scherban; Maureen M Black; Eduardo R Ochoa; Arvin Garg Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Jana C Leary; Leena Rijhwani; Natalie M Bettez; Amy M LeClair; Anays Murillo; Maria Rodriguez Berrios; Arvin Garg; Karen M Freund Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Katherine J Lake; Mark A Boyd; Lisa Smithers; Natasha J Howard; Anna P Dawson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 2.908