BACKGROUND: Intraoperative burst-suppression is associated with postoperative delirium. Whether this association is causal remains unclear. Therefore, the authors investigated whether burst-suppression during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) mediates the effects of known delirium risk factors on postoperative delirium. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort observational substudy of the Minimizing ICU [intensive care unit] Neurological Dysfunction with Dexmedetomidine-induced Sleep (MINDDS) trial. The authors analyzed data from patients more than 60 yr old undergoing cardiac surgery (n = 159). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess for associations and enable causal inference. Delirium risk factors were evaluated using the abbreviated Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System questionnaires for applied cognition, physical function, global health, sleep, and pain. The authors also analyzed electroencephalogram data (n = 141). RESULTS: The incidence of delirium in patients with CPB burst-suppression was 25% (15 of 60) compared with 6% (5 of 81) in patients without CPB burst-suppression. In univariate analyses, age (odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.14]; P = 0.002), lowest CPB temperature (odds ratio, 0.79 [0.66 to 0.94]; P = 0.010), alpha power (odds ratio, 0.65 [0.54 to 0.80]; P < 0.001), and physical function (odds ratio, 0.95 [0.91 to 0.98]; P = 0.007) were associated with CPB burst-suppression. In separate univariate analyses, age (odds ratio, 1.09 [1.02 to 1.16]; P = 0.009), abbreviated Montreal Cognitive Assessment (odds ratio, 0.80 [0.66 to 0.97]; P = 0.024), alpha power (odds ratio, 0.75 [0.59 to 0.96]; P = 0.025), and CPB burst-suppression (odds ratio, 3.79 [1.5 to 9.6]; P = 0.005) were associated with delirium. However, only physical function (odds ratio, 0.96 [0.91 to 0.99]; P = 0.044), lowest CPB temperature (odds ratio, 0.73 [0.58 to 0.88]; P = 0.003), and electroencephalogram alpha power (odds ratio, 0.61 [0.47 to 0.76]; P < 0.001) were retained as predictors in the burst-suppression multivariable model. Burst-suppression (odds ratio, 4.1 [1.5 to 13.7]; P = 0.012) and age (odds ratio, 1.07 [0.99 to 1.15]; P = 0.090) were retained as predictors in the delirium multivariable model. Delirium was associated with decreased electroencephalogram power from 6.8 to 24.4 Hertz. CONCLUSIONS: The inference from the present study is that CPB burst-suppression mediates the effects of physical function, lowest CPB temperature, and electroencephalogram alpha power on delirium.
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative burst-suppression is associated with postoperative delirium. Whether this association is causal remains unclear. Therefore, the authors investigated whether burst-suppression during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) mediates the effects of known delirium risk factors on postoperative delirium. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort observational substudy of the Minimizing ICU [intensive care unit] Neurological Dysfunction with Dexmedetomidine-induced Sleep (MINDDS) trial. The authors analyzed data from patients more than 60 yr old undergoing cardiac surgery (n = 159). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess for associations and enable causal inference. Delirium risk factors were evaluated using the abbreviated Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System questionnaires for applied cognition, physical function, global health, sleep, and pain. The authors also analyzed electroencephalogram data (n = 141). RESULTS: The incidence of delirium in patients with CPB burst-suppression was 25% (15 of 60) compared with 6% (5 of 81) in patients without CPB burst-suppression. In univariate analyses, age (odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.14]; P = 0.002), lowest CPB temperature (odds ratio, 0.79 [0.66 to 0.94]; P = 0.010), alpha power (odds ratio, 0.65 [0.54 to 0.80]; P < 0.001), and physical function (odds ratio, 0.95 [0.91 to 0.98]; P = 0.007) were associated with CPB burst-suppression. In separate univariate analyses, age (odds ratio, 1.09 [1.02 to 1.16]; P = 0.009), abbreviated Montreal Cognitive Assessment (odds ratio, 0.80 [0.66 to 0.97]; P = 0.024), alpha power (odds ratio, 0.75 [0.59 to 0.96]; P = 0.025), and CPB burst-suppression (odds ratio, 3.79 [1.5 to 9.6]; P = 0.005) were associated with delirium. However, only physical function (odds ratio, 0.96 [0.91 to 0.99]; P = 0.044), lowest CPB temperature (odds ratio, 0.73 [0.58 to 0.88]; P = 0.003), and electroencephalogram alpha power (odds ratio, 0.61 [0.47 to 0.76]; P < 0.001) were retained as predictors in the burst-suppression multivariable model. Burst-suppression (odds ratio, 4.1 [1.5 to 13.7]; P = 0.012) and age (odds ratio, 1.07 [0.99 to 1.15]; P = 0.090) were retained as predictors in the delirium multivariable model. Delirium was associated with decreased electroencephalogram power from 6.8 to 24.4 Hertz. CONCLUSIONS: The inference from the present study is that CPB burst-suppression mediates the effects of physical function, lowest CPB temperature, and electroencephalogram alpha power on delirium.
Authors: Carla R Schubert; Mary E Fischer; A Alex Pinto; Yanjun Chen; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Michael Y Tsai; Ted S Tweed; Karen J Cruickshanks Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: George S Plummer; Reine Ibala; Eunice Hahm; Jingzhi An; Jacob Gitlin; Hao Deng; Kenneth T Shelton; Ken Solt; Jason Z Qu; Oluwaseun Akeju Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Ayòtúndé B Fadayomi; Reine Ibala; Federico Bilotta; Michael B Westover; Oluwaseun Akeju Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Haoqi Sun; Luis Paixao; Jefferson T Oliva; Balaji Goparaju; Diego Z Carvalho; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Oluwaseun Akeju; Robert J Thomas; Sydney S Cash; Matt T Bianchi; M Brandon Westover Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Sarinnapha M Vasunilashorn; Simon T Dillon; Sharon K Inouye; Long H Ngo; Tamara G Fong; Richard N Jones; Thomas G Travison; Eva M Schmitt; David C Alsop; Steven D Freedman; Steven E Arnold; Eran D Metzger; Towia A Libermann; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lisanne F ten Brinke; Niousha Bolandzadeh; Lindsay S Nagamatsu; Chun Liang Hsu; Jennifer C Davis; Karim Miran-Khan; Teresa Liu-Ambrose Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Mary Cooter Wright; Thomas Bunning; Sarada S Eleswarpu; Mitchell T Heflin; Shelley R McDonald; Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadalayan; Heather E Whitson; Pablo Martinez-Camblor; Stacie G Deiner; Miles Berger Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: D Pleasants; R Zak; L H Ashbrook; L Zhang; C Tang; D Tran; M Wang; S Tabatabai; J M Leung Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 1.977