Literature DB >> 32348964

Characterization of a customized 3D-printed cell culture system using clear, translucent acrylate that enables optical online monitoring.

Ina Gerhild Siller1, Anton Enders2, Pia Gellermann2, Steffen Winkler2, Antonina Lavrentieva2, Thomas Scheper2, Janina Bahnemann2.   

Abstract

Cells are very sensitive to their direct environment - they place high demands, for example, on ambient culture medium, adjacent cell types, and the properties of surrounding material parts. As a result, mechanical and physical material properties - such as surface roughness, swelling, electrostatic effects, etc. - can all have a significant impact on cell behavior. In addition, a material's composition also impacts whether that material meets biocompatibility requirements and can thus be considered for potential use in biomedical applications. The entry of high-resolution 3D printing technology in biotechnology has opened the door to individually-designed experiment-adaptable devices of almost unlimited complexity that can be manufactured within just a few hours. 3D printing materials are frequently lacking in the characteristics that make them suitable for biomedical applications, however. This study introduces a high-resolution polyacrylic 3D printing material as a potential alternative material for use in cultivation systems with indirect or direct contact to cells. Viability analyses, studies of apoptotic/necrotic cell death response, and surface studies all suggest that this material meets the requirements for (in vitro) biocompatibility, and has surface properties sufficient to permit uninhibited cell proliferation for cells in direct contact to the material. Moreover, the translucency of this material facilitates the type of optical monitoring required for performing experiments in a microfluidic environment, or for facilitating microscopic observations. Creative Commons Attribution license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; additive manufacturing; biocompatibility; biomaterials; mammalian cell culture; rapid prototyping

Year:  2020        PMID: 32348964     DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab8e97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of advanced methods and materials for construction of scintillation detector light guides.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Matthew B Johnson; Joshua Bintrim; Vikum Dewasurendra; Kelsey Crawford; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Peter Martone; Philip Mantz
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  3D Tissue-Engineered Vascular Drug Screening Platforms: Promise and Considerations.

Authors:  Isra Marei; Tala Abu Samaan; Maryam Ali Al-Quradaghi; Asmaa A Farah; Shamin Hayat Mahmud; Hong Ding; Chris R Triggle
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  3D-Printed Flow Cells for Aptamer-Based Impedimetric Detection of E. coli Crooks Strain.

Authors:  Ina G Siller; John-Alexander Preuss; Katharina Urmann; Michael R Hoffmann; Thomas Scheper; Janina Bahnemann
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.