Laura Seese1, Gavin Hickey2, Mary Keebler2, Floyd Thoma3, Arman Kilic4. 1. Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: kilica2@upmc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study reports a single-center experience with thrombolytics for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pump thrombosis. METHODS: Adults undergoing continuous-flow LVAD implantation between 2004 and 2018 at a single center were reviewed and those with pump thrombosis were identified. Primary outcomes included 1-year survival and success rates of thrombolytic therapy. Secondary outcomes included posttreatment adverse events, freedom from major bleeding at 1 year, and freedom from stroke at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients underwent LVAD implantation and 10.8% (n = 37) developed pump thrombosis. Of those 37, 26 received initial thrombolytic therapy (70.2%), 5 underwent direct pump exchange (13.5%), and 6 received only intravenous heparin owing to presentation with acute stroke or severe multiorgan failure (16.2%). Successful treatment was achieved in 11.5% of patients receiving thrombolytics (n = 3). Early adverse events after thrombolytic therapy included major bleeding in 11.5% (n = 3) and new stroke in 7.7% (n = 2). Most patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy underwent subsequent device exchange (69.2%; n = 18). Overall survival in patients with pump thrombosis after treatment was 96.8% at 30 days, 78.9% at 90 days, and 63.1% at 1 year. Freedom from major bleeding and stroke at 1 year was 74.2% and 87.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center experience of thrombolytics for pump thrombosis in LVAD patients, there was limited efficacy; most patients required subsequent pump exchange. Combined with the risk for major bleeding or stroke with thrombolysis, this underscores the importance of further refining patient selection for direct pump exchange in those presenting with pump thrombosis.
BACKGROUND: This study reports a single-center experience with thrombolytics for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pump thrombosis. METHODS: Adults undergoing continuous-flow LVAD implantation between 2004 and 2018 at a single center were reviewed and those with pump thrombosis were identified. Primary outcomes included 1-year survival and success rates of thrombolytic therapy. Secondary outcomes included posttreatment adverse events, freedom from major bleeding at 1 year, and freedom from stroke at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients underwent LVAD implantation and 10.8% (n = 37) developed pump thrombosis. Of those 37, 26 received initial thrombolytic therapy (70.2%), 5 underwent direct pump exchange (13.5%), and 6 received only intravenous heparin owing to presentation with acute stroke or severe multiorgan failure (16.2%). Successful treatment was achieved in 11.5% of patients receiving thrombolytics (n = 3). Early adverse events after thrombolytic therapy included major bleeding in 11.5% (n = 3) and new stroke in 7.7% (n = 2). Most patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy underwent subsequent device exchange (69.2%; n = 18). Overall survival in patients with pump thrombosis after treatment was 96.8% at 30 days, 78.9% at 90 days, and 63.1% at 1 year. Freedom from major bleeding and stroke at 1 year was 74.2% and 87.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center experience of thrombolytics for pump thrombosis in LVAD patients, there was limited efficacy; most patients required subsequent pump exchange. Combined with the risk for major bleeding or stroke with thrombolysis, this underscores the importance of further refining patient selection for direct pump exchange in those presenting with pump thrombosis.