E Espin1, F Vallribera1, E Kreisler2, S Biondo2. 1. Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona,, Spain. 2. Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Investigation Institute), Hospital de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona,, Spain.
Abstract
AIM: Anastomotic leakage is a major complication after right hemicolectomy leading to increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay and hospital costs. Previous studies have shown that the type of anastomosis (handsewn or stapled) is a major risk factor for anastomotic leakage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of anastomotic leakage depending on the type of anastomotic technique (handsewn vs stapled). METHOD: This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study. Data were collected at two major hospitals in Spain from January 2010 to December 2016. Patients had elective right colectomy for cancer with handsewn or stapled ileocolic anastomosis. The main outcome was the grading of postoperative treatments needed to manage anastomotic leakage according to two major classification systems. The other outcomes were demographics, time of hospitalization and death rate. RESULTS: Patients (n = 961) underwent elective surgery for neoplasia of the right colon. Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 116 patients (12.07%). Patients with handsewn anastomosis had more Type IIIA surgical complications and received milder treatments than patients with stapled anastomosis (SA) who had more Type IIIB complications and more re-laparotomies (P = 0.004). The clinical impact of anastomotic leakage was significantly more severe (Grade C) in patients with SA than in patients with a handsewn anastomosis (P = 0.007). No differences were found for hospital stay of patients with anastomotic leakage depending on the type of anastomosis (P = 0.275). Death due to anastomotic leakage was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of anastomotic leakage in patients with handsewn anastomosis is lower than in patients with SA. Colorectal Disease
AIM: Anastomotic leakage is a major complication after right hemicolectomy leading to increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay and hospital costs. Previous studies have shown that the type of anastomosis (handsewn or stapled) is a major risk factor for anastomotic leakage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of anastomotic leakage depending on the type of anastomotic technique (handsewn vs stapled). METHOD: This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study. Data were collected at two major hospitals in Spain from January 2010 to December 2016. Patients had elective right colectomy for cancer with handsewn or stapled ileocolic anastomosis. The main outcome was the grading of postoperative treatments needed to manage anastomotic leakage according to two major classification systems. The other outcomes were demographics, time of hospitalization and death rate. RESULTS:Patients (n = 961) underwent elective surgery for neoplasia of the right colon. Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 116 patients (12.07%). Patients with handsewn anastomosis had more Type IIIA surgical complications and received milder treatments than patients with stapled anastomosis (SA) who had more Type IIIB complications and more re-laparotomies (P = 0.004). The clinical impact of anastomotic leakage was significantly more severe (Grade C) in patients with SA than in patients with a handsewn anastomosis (P = 0.007). No differences were found for hospital stay of patients with anastomotic leakage depending on the type of anastomosis (P = 0.275). Death due to anastomotic leakage was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of anastomotic leakage in patients with handsewn anastomosis is lower than in patients with SA. Colorectal Disease
Authors: Antonio Biondi; Gianluca Di Mauro; Riccardo Morici; Giuseppe Sangiorgio; Marco Vacante; Francesco Basile Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-19 Impact factor: 4.241