| Literature DB >> 32348434 |
Emre Aydın1, Yaşar Yıldırım1, Fatma Yılmaz Aydın2, Mehmet Veysi Bahadır3, İbrahim Kaplan4, Berfin Kadiroğlu5, Muzaffer Aydın Ketani6, Zülfükar Yılmaz1, Ali Kemal Kadiroğlu1, Mehmet Emin Yılmaz1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is an important cause of mortality and morbidity, and inflammatory response and oxidative stress play major roles underlying its pathophysiology. Here, we evaluated the effect of intraperitoneal etanercept administration on oxidative stress and inflammation indicators in the kidney and blood of experimental sepsis-induced rats.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32348434 PMCID: PMC7198067 DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0016-2020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ISSN: 0037-8682 Impact factor: 1.581
Histopathological scoring system.
| Score | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Absent | 25% | 25-50% | > 50% |
|
| Absent | Focal | Multifocal | Diffuse |
|
| Absent | Focal | Multifocal | Diffuse |
|
| Absent | Focal | Multifocal | Diffuse |
|
| Absent | Focal | Multifocal | Diffuse |
|
| Absent | Focal | Multifocal | Diffuse |
Comparison of serum and kidney levels of oxidative stress and inflammation indicator parameters.
| Parameters | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Sepsis | Sepsis + Cefazolin | Sepsis + Cefazolin + Etanercept | |
| (n = 7) | (n = 7) | (n = 7) | (n = 7) | |
|
| ||||
| CRP (pmol/L) | 18.43 ± 6.37 | 46.50 ± 6.12a | 26.40 ± 5.30b | 20.07 ± 5.27b |
| TNF-α (ng/L) | 41.74 ± 13.73 | 149.78 ± 25.02a | 109.14 ± 8.15a,b | 45.54 ± 3.7b,c |
| TREM (pg/mL) | 93.77 ± 11.55 | 172.03 ± 19.69a | 144.12 ± 23.03a,b | 97.78 ± 14.60b,c |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 1.49 ± 0.54 | 3.07 ± 0.71a | 2.33 ± 0.72 | 1.50 ± 0.41b |
|
| ||||
| CRP (pmol/L) | 23.52 ± 10.29 | 32.88 ± 19.35 | 27.26 ± 11.97 | 21.47 ± 5.41 |
| TNF-α (ng/L) | 33.88 ± 10.07 | 93.07 ± 41.95a | 78.5 ± 23.84a | 44.67 ± 13.76b |
| TREM (pg/mL) | 54.77± 14.96 | 146.89 ± 76a | 116.35 ± 18.62 | 59.66 ± 25.07b |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 0.66 ± 0.36 | 1.39 ± 0.63a | 1.18 ± 0.43 | 1.01 ± 0.06 |
CRP: C-reactive protein, TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha, TREM: triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells, MDA: malondialdehyde. ap < 0.05 in comparison with control group. bp < 0.05 in comparison with sepsis group. cp < 0.05 in comparison with sepsis + cefazolin group
FIGURE 1:Histopathological findings of the study groups. a: In control group, the kidney tissue showed normal morphology, b: In sepsis group, hydropic degeneration (arrow), desquamation in tubular epithelium (curved arrow), disturbance in glomerular structures, and dilatation in Bowman’s capsule (*) were observed c: In sepsis + cefazolin group, hydropic degeneration (arrow), desquamation in tubular epithelium (curved arrow), and a decrease in dilated Bowman’s capsule (*) were reported d: In sepsis + cefazolin + etanercept group, rare hydropic degeneration (arrow), desquamation in tubular epithelium (curved arrow), and dilatation in Bowman’s capsule (*) were visible (staining, H&E; original magnification, ×200).
Histopathological results.
| Histopathological findings | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Sepsis | Sepsis + cefazolin | Sepsis + cefazolin + etanercept | |
| (n = 7) | (n = 7) | (n = 7) | (n = 7) | |
|
| 0 | 2.71 ± 0.48a | 2.14 ± 0.37a,b | 1 ± 0a,b,c |
|
| 0 | 2.85 ± 0.37a | 2 ± 0a,b | 1 ± 0a,b,c |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 3 ± 0 | 2 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 2.85 ± 0.37a | 2.14 ± 0.37a,b | 0.14 ± 0.37b,c |
ap < 0.05 in comparison with control group. bp < 0.05 in comparison with sepsis group. cp < 0.05 in comparison with sepsis + cefazolin group.