| Literature DB >> 32348431 |
Emmaría Danesi1, Diana Lucrecia Fabbro2, Elsa Leonor Segura1, Sergio Sosa-Estani3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Congenital transmission (CT) of Trypanosoma cruzi has led to globalization of Chagas disease and its growing relevance as a public health problem. Although the occurrence of CT has been associated with several factors, its mechanisms are still unknown. This study aimed to analyze the geographical and familiar variables of mothers and their association with CT of Chagas disease in a population living in non-endemic areas of Argentina for the last decades.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32348431 PMCID: PMC7198065 DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0560-2019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ISSN: 0037-8682 Impact factor: 1.581
FIGURE 1:Maternal age at delivery, in groups according to maternal country of origin and congenital infection of children. Source: Own elaboration. Notes: No CT: Pair without congenital transmission; CT: Pair with congenital transmission.
Distribution of mother-child pairs according to congenital infection by Trypanosoma cruzi and variables on geographical origin and family history.
| Total | No CT | CT | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| Total population (sample) | 2120 (100.0) | 1.928 (90.9) | 192 (9.1) | |
| Country of maternal origin (n=2111) | ||||
| Argentina | 1275 | 1.138 (89.3) | 137 (10.7) | 0.003 |
| Bolivia | 617 | 573 (92.9) | 44 (7.1) | |
| Paraguay | 219 | 208 (95.0) | 11 (5.0) | |
| Argentinian province of maternal origin (n=869) | ||||
| Buenos Aires | 375 | 331 (88.3) | 44 (11.7) | 0.063 |
| CABA | 183 | 163 (89.1) | 20 (10.9) | |
| Chaco | 186 | 171 (91.9) | 15 (8.1) | |
| Santiago del Estero | 125 | 120 (96.0) | 5 (4.0) | |
| Vectorial risk of area of maternal origin (n=2076) | ||||
| High | 1001 (405) | 926 (92.5) | 75 (7.5) | 0.073 |
| Medium | 152 | 364 (89.9) | 41 (10.1) | |
| Low | 521 | 135 (88.8) | 17 (11.2) | |
| Null (non-endemic area) | 463 (88.9) | 58 (11.1) | ||
| Vectorial risk of area of maternal origin (n=2076) | ||||
| Medium-high | 1406 | 1.290 (91.8) | 116 (8.2) | 0.033 |
| Low-null | 673 | 598 (88.9) | 75 (11.1) | |
| Maternal grandmother infected with | ||||
| Yes | 457 | 394 (86.2) | 63 (13.9) | 0.001 |
| No | 470 | 436 (92.8) | 63 (7.2) | |
| Any sibling infected congenitally (n=198) | ||||
| Yes | 64 | 41 (64.1) | 23 (35.9) | <0.000 |
| No | 134 | 123 (91.8) | 11 (8.2) |
Source: Own elaboration. Notes: No CT: Pair without congenital transmission; CT: Pair with congenital transmission.
Geographical origin of mothers.
| Total | No CT | CT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |
| Total population (sample) | 2120 (100.0) | 1928 (100.0) | 192 (100.0) |
| Country of maternal origin (n=2119) | |||
| Argentina | 1275 (60.2) | 1138 (59.1) | 137 (71.4) |
| Bolivia | 617 (29.1) | 573 (29.7) | 44 (22.9) |
| Brazil | 3 (0.1) | 3 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) |
| Chile | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| Paraguay | 219 (10.3) | 208 (10.8) | 11 (5.7) |
| Perú | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Uruguay | 2 (0.1) | 2 (0.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| Otros | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Argentinean province of maternal origin (n=1275) | |||
| Buenos Aires | 375 (29.4) | 331 (29.1) | 44 (32.1) |
| CABA | 183 (14.3) | 163 (14.3) | 20 (14.6) |
| Catamarca | 2 (0.2) | 2 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) |
| Chaco | 186 (14.6) | 171 (15.0) | 15 (10.9) |
| Corrientes | 29 (2.3) | 27 (2.4) | 2 (1.5) |
| Córdoba | 6 (0.5) | 6 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Entre Ríos | 26 (2.0) | 19 (1.7) | 7 (5.1) |
| Formosa | 34 (2.7) | 30 (2.6) | 4 (2.9) |
| Jujuy | 48 (3.8) | 42 (3.7) | 6 (4.4) |
| La Pampa | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) |
| La Rioja | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| Mendoza | 13 (1.0) | 11 (1.0) | 2 (1.5) |
| Misiones | 31 (2.4) | 27 (2.4) | 4 (2.9) |
| Neuquén | 3 (0.2) | 3 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Rio Negro | 2 (0.2) | 2 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) |
| Salta | 58 (4.5) | 51 (4.5) | 7 (5.1) |
| San Juan | 6 (0.5) | 5 (0.4) | 1 (0.7) |
| San Luis | 3 (0.2) | 3 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Santa Fe | 119 (9.3) | 99 (8.7) | 20 (14.6) |
| Santiago del Estero | 125 (9.8) | 120 (10.5) | 5 (3.7) |
| Tucumán | 23 (1.8) | 23 (2.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Source: Own elaboration.