Michael R Pinsky1, Fabio Guarracino2. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We will highlight the role of ventriculoarterial coupling in the pathophysiology of sepsis and how to assess it. RECENT FINDINGS: Most septic patients show a ventriculoarterial uncoupling at the time of diagnosis with arterial elastance (Ea) greater than left ventricle (LV) end-systolic elastance (Ees), often despite arterial hypotension. Ventriculoarterial coupling levels predict the cardiovascular response to resuscitation in this heterogeneously responding population. SUMMARY: Ventriculoarterial coupling is quantified as the ratio of Ea to Ees. The efficiency of the cardiovascular function is optimal when Ea/Ees is near one. When the hydraulic load of the arterial system is excessive either from increased vasomotor tone, decreased LV contractility or both, Ea/Ees becomes greater than 1 (i.e. ventriculoarterial decoupling), and cardiac efficiency decreases leading to heart failure, loss of volume responsiveness, and if sustained, increased mortality. Noninvasive echocardiographic techniques when linked with arterial pressure monitoring allow for the bedside estimates of both Ea and Ees. Studies using this approach have documented the key role ventriculoarterial coupling has defining initial cardiovascular state, response to therapy and outcome from critical illness. Sequential monitoring of ventriculoarterial coupling at the bedside offers a unique opportunity to assess relevant cardiovascular determinants in septic patients requiring resuscitation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We will highlight the role of ventriculoarterial coupling in the pathophysiology of sepsis and how to assess it. RECENT FINDINGS: Most septic patients show a ventriculoarterial uncoupling at the time of diagnosis with arterial elastance (Ea) greater than left ventricle (LV) end-systolic elastance (Ees), often despite arterial hypotension. Ventriculoarterial coupling levels predict the cardiovascular response to resuscitation in this heterogeneously responding population. SUMMARY: Ventriculoarterial coupling is quantified as the ratio of Ea to Ees. The efficiency of the cardiovascular function is optimal when Ea/Ees is near one. When the hydraulic load of the arterial system is excessive either from increased vasomotor tone, decreased LV contractility or both, Ea/Ees becomes greater than 1 (i.e. ventriculoarterial decoupling), and cardiac efficiency decreases leading to heart failure, loss of volume responsiveness, and if sustained, increased mortality. Noninvasive echocardiographic techniques when linked with arterial pressure monitoring allow for the bedside estimates of both Ea and Ees. Studies using this approach have documented the key role ventriculoarterial coupling has defining initial cardiovascular state, response to therapy and outcome from critical illness. Sequential monitoring of ventriculoarterial coupling at the bedside offers a unique opportunity to assess relevant cardiovascular determinants in septic patients requiring resuscitation.
Authors: Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: M Takeuchi; Y Igarashi; S Tomimoto; M Odake; T Hayashi; T Tsukamoto; K Hata; H Takaoka; H Fukuzaki Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Fabio Guarracino; Baldassare Ferro; Andrea Morelli; Pietro Bertini; Rubia Baldassarri; Michael R Pinsky Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Zhongping Jian; Jos J Settels; Charles Hunley; Maurizio Cecconi; Feras Hatib; Michael R Pinsky Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: François Bagate; Alexandre Coppens; Paul Masi; Nicolas de Prost; Guillaume Carteaux; Keyvan Razazi; Armand Mekontso Dessap Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-26