Literature DB >> 32347940

The internal region of CtIP negatively regulates DNA end resection.

Sean Michael Howard1, Ilaria Ceppi1,2, Roopesh Anand1, Roger Geiger1, Petr Cejka1,2.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by end-joining or homologous recombination. A key-committing step of recombination is DNA end resection. In resection, phosphorylated CtIP first promotes the endonuclease of MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN). Subsequently, CtIP also stimulates the WRN/BLM-DNA2 pathway, coordinating thus both short and long-range resection. The structure of CtIP differs from its orthologues in yeast, as it contains a large internal unstructured region. Here, we conducted a domain analysis of CtIP to define the function of the internal region in DNA end resection. We found that residues 350-600 were entirely dispensable for resection in vitro. A mutant lacking these residues was unexpectedly more efficient than full-length CtIP in DNA end resection and homologous recombination in vivo, and consequently conferred resistance to lesions induced by the topoisomerase poison camptothecin, which require high MRN-CtIP-dependent resection activity for repair. This suggested that the internal CtIP region, further mapped to residues 550-600, may mediate a negative regulatory function to prevent over resection in vivo. The CtIP internal deletion mutant exhibited sensitivity to other DNA-damaging drugs, showing that upregulated resection may be instead toxic under different conditions. These experiments together identify a region within the central CtIP domain that negatively regulates DNA end resection.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32347940     DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  5 in total

1.  Bloom helicase mediates formation of large single-stranded DNA loops during DNA end processing.

Authors:  Chaoyou Xue; Sameer J Salunkhe; Nozomi Tomimatsu; Ajinkya S Kawale; Youngho Kwon; Sandeep Burma; Patrick Sung; Eric C Greene
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 2.  Double-Stranded Break Repair in Mammalian Cells and Precise Genome Editing.

Authors:  Akhtar Ali; Wei Xiao; Masroor Ellahi Babar; Yanzhen Bi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  CDK2 phosphorylation of Werner protein (WRN) contributes to WRN's DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Jong-Hyuk Lee; Raghavendra A Shamanna; Tomasz Kulikowicz; Nima Borhan Fakouri; Edward W Kim; Louise S Christiansen; Deborah L Croteau; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 9.304

4.  Strand annealing and motor driven activities of SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 are stimulated by RAD51 and the paralog complex.

Authors:  Swagata Halder; Lepakshi Ranjha; Angelo Taglialatela; Alberto Ciccia; Petr Cejka
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 19.160

5.  The CDK1-TOPBP1-PLK1 axis regulates the Bloom's syndrome helicase BLM to suppress crossover recombination in somatic cells.

Authors:  Chiara Balbo Pogliano; Ilaria Ceppi; Sara Giovannini; Vasiliki Petroulaki; Nathan Palmer; Federico Uliana; Marco Gatti; Kristina Kasaciunaite; Raimundo Freire; Ralf Seidel; Matthias Altmeyer; Petr Cejka; Joao Matos
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.