Literature DB >> 32347738

Colorectal stenting in England: a cross-sectional study of practice.

J Lam1, V Chauhan1, I Lam2, L Kannappa1, Y Salama1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: UK and European guidelines recommend consideration of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as an alternative to emergency surgery in left-sided colonic obstruction. However, there is no clear consensus on stenting owing to concern for complications and long-term outcomes. Our study is the first to explore SEMS provision across England.
METHODS: All colorectal surgery department leads in England were contacted in 2018 and invited to complete an objective multiple choice questionnaire pertaining to service provision of colorectal stenting (including referrals, time, location and specialty).
RESULTS: Of 182 hospitals contacted, 79 responded (24 teaching hospitals, 55 district general hospitals). All hospitals considered stenting, with 92% performing stenting and the remainder referring. The majority (93%) performed fewer than four stenting procedures per month. Most (96%) stented during normal weekday hours, with only 25% stenting out of hours and 23% at weekends. Compared with district general hospitals, a higher proportion of teaching hospitals stented out of hours and at weekends. Stenting was performed in the radiology department (64%), the endoscopy department (44%) and operating theatres (15%), by surgeons (63%), radiologists (60%) and gastroenterologists (48%). A radiologist was present in 66% of cases. Of 14 hospitals that received referrals, 3 had a protocol, 3 returned patients the same day and 4 returned patients for management in the event of failure.
CONCLUSIONS: All responding hospitals in England consider the use of SEMS in colonic obstruction. Nevertheless, there is great variation in stenting practices, and challenges in terms of access and expertise. Centralisation and regional referral networks may help maximise availability and expertise but more work is needed to support this.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; England; Obstruction; Self-expandable metallic stent; Volume

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32347738      PMCID: PMC7388958          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  47 in total

1.  Left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplant network improves survival after failed cardiotomy.

Authors:  D N Helman; D L Morales; N M Edwards; D M Mancini; J M Chen; E A Rose; M C Oz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Improving patient outcomes from acute cardiovascular events through regionalized systems of care.

Authors:  J Matthew Edwards; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2010-11

3.  Surgical Volumes and Outcomes-Does Practice Make Perfect?

Authors:  Nitin A Pagedar
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Colorectal obstruction: treatment with metallic stents.

Authors:  A Mainar; E Tejero; M Maynar; H Ferral; W Castañeda-Zúñiga
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Is stenting as "a bridge to surgery" an oncologically safe strategy for the management of acute, left-sided, malignant, colonic obstruction? A comparative study with a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Charles Sabbagh; François Browet; Momar Diouf; Cyril Cosse; Olivier Brehant; Eric Bartoli; François Mauvais; Bruno Chauffert; Jean-Louis Dupas; Eric Nguyen-Khac; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Outcomes after stenting for malignant large bowel obstruction without radiologist support.

Authors:  Rao Khalid Mehmood; Jody Parker; Patricia Kirkbride; Shakil Ahmed; Fayyaz Akbar; Eays Qasem; Muhammad Zeeshan; Ernest Jehangir
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Routes to diagnosis for cancer - determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets.

Authors:  L Elliss-Brookes; S McPhail; A Ives; M Greenslade; J Shelton; S Hiom; M Richards
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Do colorectal cancer patients diagnosed as an emergency differ from non-emergency patients in their consultation patterns and symptoms? A longitudinal data-linkage study in England.

Authors:  C Renzi; G Lyratzopoulos; T Card; T P C Chu; U Macleod; B Rachet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies.

Authors:  Maninder Singh Setia
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 10.  Colonic stent versus emergency surgery as treatment of malignant colonic obstruction in the palliative setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Igor Braga Ribeiro; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Bruno da Costa Martins; Diogo Touriani Hourneau de Moura; Elisa Ryoka Baba; Iatagan Rocha Josino; Nelson Tomio Miyahima; Martin Andrés Coronel Cordero; Thiago Arantes de Carvalho Visconti; Edson Ide; Paulo Sakai; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneau de Moura
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.