Literature DB >> 32347442

Risk factors of in-hospital death in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Yong Li1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary disease; In-hospital mortality; Killip classification; ST elevation myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32347442      PMCID: PMC7511274          DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02338-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


× No keyword cloud information.

Background

Coronary heart disease remains the leading cause of mortality [1]. Prevention of in-hospital death is a crucial step in improving prognosis of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We want to investigate the risk factors of in-hospital death.

Methods

Source of data

Totally 9668 patients with acute STEMI in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2002 to August 2019. Inclusion criteria: (1) patient hospitalized with STEMI; (2) age of more than 18 years. We established the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and STEMI base on fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction [2]. Exclusion criteria: none.

Evaluation and diagnosis of in-hospital death

All causes for in-hospital death is defined as cardiac or non-cardiac death during hospitalization.

Predictors

We selected 11 predictor variables for inclusion in our prediction rule. They were shown in Table 1. PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting. Atrial fibrillation is defined as all type of atrial fibrillation during hospitalization. Atrioventricular block is defined as all type of atrioventricular block during hospitalization.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with in-hospital death and in-hospital survivors

Characteristic[lower limit, upper limit]In-hospital deaths(n = 188)In-hospital survivors(n = 9480)Odds RatioP >|Z|95% CI
Age (year, x ± s) [21, 91]71 ± 1259 ± 121.1 < 0.0011.084–1.116
Man n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes119 (63.3)7602 (80.2)0.4260.0010.315–0.576

History of hypertension

n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes

122 (64.9)5352 (56.5)1.4260.0211.054–1.929

History of diabetes

n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes

64 (34)2864 (30.2)1.1920.2580.879–1.617
History of myocardial infarction n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes29 (15.4)763 (8)2.084 < 0.0011.393–3.117

History of PCI

n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes

15 (8)771 (8.1)0.9790.9390.575–1.668

History of CABG

n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes

3 (1.6)53 (0.6)2.8840.0770.893–9.314

Killip classification

n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes

 Killip I8 (4.3)4936 (52.1)0.041 < 0.0010.02–0.083
 Killip II25 (13.3)3429 (36.2)0.271 < 0.0010.178–0.413
 Killip III31 (16.5)628 (6.6)2.783 < 0.0011.878–4.126
 Killip IV124 (66)490 (5.2)35.548 < 0.00125.94–48.712

Atrial fibrillation

n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes

35 (18.6)449 (4.7)4.601 < 0.0013.149–6.723

Atrioventricular block

n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes

18 (9.6)249 (2.6)3.925 < 0.0012.376–6.484

Underwent PCI during hospitalization n (%)

0 = no, 1 = yes

51 (27.1)7328 (77.3)0.109 < 0.0010.079–0.151
Clinical characteristics of patients with in-hospital death and in-hospital survivors History of hypertension n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes History of diabetes n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes History of PCI n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes History of CABG n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes Killip classification n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes Atrial fibrillation n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes Atrioventricular block n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes Underwent PCI during hospitalization n (%) 0 = no, 1 = yes

Statistical analysis

We followed the methods of Li et al. 2019 [3].

Results

Participants and predictors of in-hospital death

Totally 188 patients had in-hospital death (in-hospital death group) and 9480 patients had no in-hospital death (control group). The results are shown in Table 1.

Predictors of in-hospital death

Eight variables (age, gender, history of myocardial infarction, history of hypertension, Killip classification, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block, and underwent PCI during hospitalization) were significant differences in the two groups of patients (p < 0.05). After application of backward variable selection method, three variables (underwent PCI, age, and Killip classification) remained as significant independent predictors of in-hospital death. Results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2

Predictor of in-hospital death obtained from multivariable logistic regression models (odds ratio)

In-hospital deathOdds RatioStd. ErrZP >|Z|95% CI
Age1.050.0085.99 < 0.0011.033–1.066

Underwent PCI

during hospitalization

0.3430.065 − 5.67 < 0.0010.237–0.497
Killip II3.0791.1642.970.0031.467–6.461
Killip III10.613.9926.28 < 0.0015.076–22.181
Killip IV64.71521.98112.28 < 0.00133.257–125.929
_Cons0.00020.0001 − 13.20 < 0.0010.00006–0.0008
Table 3

Predictor of in-hospital death obtained from multivariable logistic regression models (Coef)

In-hospital deathCoefStd. ErrZP >|Z|95% CI
Age0.0480.0085.99 < 0.0010.033–0.064
Underwent PCI during hospitalization − 1.0690.188 − 5.67 < 0.001 − 1.438– − 0.699
Killip II1.1250.3782.970.0030.384–1.866
Killip III2.3620.3766.28 < 0.0011.625–3.099
Killip IV4.170.3412.28 < 0.0013.504–4.836
_Cons − 8.4260.639 − 13.20 < 0.001 − 9.677– − 7.174
Predictor of in-hospital death obtained from multivariable logistic regression models (odds ratio) Underwent PCI during hospitalization Predictor of in-hospital death obtained from multivariable logistic regression models (Coef) We drew the receiver operating characteristic curve. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94 ± 0.007, 95% CI = 0.926–0.954.

Study limitations

This is a single-center experience. Some patients were enrolled > 10 years ago, thus their treatment may not conform to current standards and techniques.

Discussion

We investigated the predisposing factors of in-hospital death. A frequency of in-hospital death was 1.9% (188/9668). Killip classification is an independent risk factor of in-hospital death. In our study, patients with Killip class IV were at 64.7 higher risk of in-hospital death than patients with Killip class I–III. Not underwent PCI is an independent risk factor of in-hospital death. Patients who do not get successful reperfusion are at higher risk of early complications and death [4]. Age is an independent risk factor of in-hospital death. Older patients have more comorbidities and are less likely to receive reperfusion therapy [5, 6]. Elderly patients are also at particular risk of bleeding [4].

Conclusions

Age, not underwent PCI during hospitalization, and Killip classification are independent risk factors for predicting in-hospital death in patients with acute STEMI. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (CSV 321 kb)
  5 in total

1.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Paul Muntner; Alvaro Alonso; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Sandeep R Das; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Martin O'Flaherty; Ambarish Pandey; Amanda M Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Mintu P Turakhia; Lisa B VanWagner; John T Wilkins; Sally S Wong; Salim S Virani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Borja Ibanez; Stefan James; Stefan Agewall; Manuel J Antunes; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Héctor Bueno; Alida L P Caforio; Filippo Crea; John A Goudevenos; Sigrun Halvorsen; Gerhard Hindricks; Adnan Kastrati; Mattie J Lenzen; Eva Prescott; Marco Roffi; Marco Valgimigli; Christoph Varenhorst; Pascal Vranckx; Petr Widimský
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  The impact of increased age on outcome from a strategy of early invasive management and revascularisation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: retrospective analysis study from the ACACIA registry.

Authors:  Christopher J Malkin; Roshan Prakash; Derek P Chew
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Treatment choices in elderly patients with ST: elevation myocardial infarction-insights from the Vital Heart Response registry.

Authors:  Olga Toleva; Quazi Ibrahim; Neil Brass; Sunil Sookram; Robert Welsh
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-06-24

5.  Risk Factors of Periprocedural Bradycardia during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yong Li; Shuzheng Lyu
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 1.866

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Study on the predictive ability of emergency CHADS2 score and CHA2DS2-VASc score for coronary artery disease and prognosis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Hong Lv; Zeyan Liu; Yuan Liu; Xue Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.005

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.