| Literature DB >> 32347408 |
Samer Younes1, Felix Bracharz1, Dania Awad1, Farah Qoura1, Norbert Mehlmer1, Thomas Brueck2.
Abstract
Due to increasing class="Chemical">oil prices aclass="Chemical">nd climate chaclass="Chemical">nge coclass="Chemical">ncerclass="Chemical">ns, biofuels have become iclass="Chemical">ncreasiclass="Chemical">ngly importaclass="Chemical">nt as poteclass="Chemical">ntial alterclass="Chemical">native eclass="Chemical">nergy sources. However, the use of arable laclass="Chemical">nds aclass="Chemical">nd valuable resources for the productioclass="Chemical">n of biofuel feedstock compromises food security aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">negatively affect the eclass="Chemical">nviroEntities:
Keywords: Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosus; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Lipid production; Microalgae biomass; Scenedesmus obtusiusculu
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32347408 PMCID: PMC7378118 DOI: 10.1007/s00449-020-02354-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioprocess Biosyst Eng ISSN: 1615-7591 Impact factor: 3.210
Biochemical composition of S. obtusiusculus, calculated as percent of total dry weight
| Biomass component | Content % |
|---|---|
| % (g/g dry biomass weight) | |
| Water | 3.7 |
| Carbohydrates | 33.8 |
| Proteins | 48.7 |
| Lipids | 8.3 |
| Pigments, secondary metabolites | 3.6 |
| Ash | 1.9 |
Relative standard deviation for all given numbers is ≤ ± 2%
Fig. 1Glucose concentration of SH displayed as a factor of various enzymes mixes and concentrations (a). Glucose concentration of SH displayed as a factor of the combination of enzyme mixtures with Cellic CTec 2 (b)
A comparison of monosaccharide content % (g/g dry biomass weight) resulting from acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis
| Sugar | Acidic hydrolysis | Enzymatic hydrolysis | Conversion |
|---|---|---|---|
| % (g/g dry biomass weight) | % (g/g dry biomass weight) | Efficiency (%) | |
| Glucose | 22 | 20–22 | 90–100 |
| Mannose | – | – | |
| Galactose | 10 | 2–2.5 | 20–25 |
| Rhamnose | ~ 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Fucose | ~ 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Ribose | ~ 1 | 0 | 0 |
Relative standard deviation for all given numbers is ≤ ± 2%
Fig. 2Rapid estimation of lipid contents in C. oleaginosus, C. curvatus and R. toruloides following 4 days cultivation on SH, determined by Nile red assay
Fig. 3C. oleaginous growth trend when grown on MNM and SH over 4 days in a shake flask fermentation
Fig. 4Lipid content (%, g lipid/g DCW) and lipid yield (g/L) of C. oleaginous cultivated in MNM and SH media for 4 days in shake flask fermentation