Literature DB >> 32347350

Influence of the Glissonean Pedicle Transection Approach in Spiegel Lobe-Preserving Left Hepatectomy on Spiegel Lobe Volume and Remnant Liver Functions.

Naoki Kamitani1, Takeo Nomi2, Daisuke Hokuto1, Takahiro Yoshikawa1, Yasuko Matsuo1, Masayuki Sho1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extrahepatic surgical technique in liver resection can be divided into glissonean pedicle transection and glissonean separated transection approaches. In this study, we compared remnant liver function and liver regeneration involving the Spiegel lobe between these two approaches regarding Spiegel lobe-preserving left hepatectomy.
METHODS: We enrolled 31 patients who underwent Spiegel lobe-preserving left hepatectomy for malignant hepatobiliary diseases between April 2008 and January 2020. The postoperative Spiegel lobe volume was measured using a volume analyzer at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 22 and 9 were included in the glissonean separated transection and glissonean pedicle transection groups, respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the preoperative Spiegel lobe volume. However, the volumes at 3 and 6 months postoperatively were significantly larger in the glissonean pedicle transection group than in the glissonean transection group (29.92 mL vs. 13.00 mL; P < 0.001 and 28.43 mL vs. 15.01 mL; P < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant between-group difference in postoperative remnant liver function.
CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative Spiegel lobe volume was larger, and liver regeneration was better with the glissonean pedicle transection approach because of transection for Spiegel branch of the portal vein. It is desirable to preserve Spiegel branch in possible cases when surgeons select the glissonean separated transection approach based on the location and size of the tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32347350     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05548-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Total resection of the right lobe of the liver; report of a successful case.

Authors:  I HONJO; C ARAKI
Journal:  J Int Coll Surg       Date:  1955-01

2.  [Well defined technic for right hepatectomy].

Authors:  J L LORTAT-JACOB; H G ROBERT
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1952-04-16       Impact factor: 1.228

3.  Liver Regeneration is Preserved After At Least Four Repeated Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Takamune Yamaguchi; Takashi Kokudo; Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Junichi Kaneko; Junichi Arita; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Norihiro Kokudo; Kiyoshi Hasegawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A simplified method for controlled left hepatectomy.

Authors:  C M Couinaud
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Risk factors influencing postoperative outcomes of major hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with underlying liver diseases.

Authors:  Tian Yang; Jin Zhang; Jun-Hua Lu; Guang-Shun Yang; Meng-Chao Wu; Wei-Feng Yu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Ascites in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Takahiro Yoshikawa; Takeo Nomi; Daisuke Hokuto; Satoshi Yasuda; Chihiro Kawaguchi; Takatsugu Yamada; Hiromichi Kanehiro; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A standardized safe hepatectomy; selective Glissonean transection using endolinear stapling devices.

Authors:  Masahiko Fujii; Mitsuo Shimada; Imura Satoru; Yuji Morine; Tetsuya Ikemoto; Yuji Soejima
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007 Apr-May
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.