| Literature DB >> 32347218 |
Piotr Golec1,2, Joanna Golec3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is controversial. Choosing the optimal surgical technique is very important for patient quality of life and activity. In this study, we asked the question: "What is the long-term quality of life of patients after intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated by minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous stabilization (MIRPS)?". MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 51 patients - 45 males (88%) and 6 females (12%) - who underwent MIRPS of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The males were ages 22-63 years, with a mean age of 46 years, while the females were aged 31-63, with a mean age of 47 years. The FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) survey was used. RESULTS Women's FAOS scores were 72-95%, with a mean of 82%, and varied according to type of fracture, surgery method used, and comorbid fractures. Men's FAOS scores were 50-95%, with a mean of 84%, and varied according to type of fracture, surgery method used, and comorbid fractures. CONCLUSIONS According to set criteria regarding the FAOS scale, mainly good and very good results were observed in patients treated surgically for intra-articular calcaneus fractures using MIRPS. Westhues' method scored a significantly higher foot rating than W-R (Westhues'-Rąpała method). Patients with TTF (tongue-type fracture) scored higher in the FAOS than patients treated with JDTF (joint depression-type fracture). In other cases, no significant differences were observed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32347218 PMCID: PMC7204125 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.921602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1TTF treated with Kirschner’s wires bundle.
Figure 2The JTDF treated W-R technique.
The interpretation of the FAOS score.
| Score | FAOS [%] |
|---|---|
| Very good | 80–100 |
| Good | 60–79 |
| Satisfactory | 40–59 |
| Poor | 0–39 |
Figure 3Average FAOS score according to occurrence of comorbid fracture in general. P value=0.0583.
Figure 4Comparison of average FAOS score according to surgery technique. P value=0.0402.
Average FAOS score according to facture type and treatment method among women.
| Fracture type/Surgery technique/ Comorbid fracture | Average FAOS [%] score |
|---|---|
| TTF | 90.00 |
| TTF/W-R | 83.50 |
| JDTF | 72.00 |
| TTF+distal radius fracture/MIRPS using Kirschner’s wires | 95.00 |
Tongue-type fracture;
Westhues-Rąpała;
joint depression-type fracture;
minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous stabilization.
Average FAOS score among men according to type of fracture, surgery technique, and comorbid fractures.
| Type of fracture/Surgery technique/ Comorbid fracture | Average |
|---|---|
| TTF | 86.60 |
| TTF/W-R | 75.00 |
| JDTF | 86.00 |
| JDTF/W-R method | 78.00 |
| JDTF/MIRPS | 79.60 |
| JDTF+distal radius fracture/W-R method | 86.00 |
| JDTF+lateral condyles of tibia/W-R method | 77.50 |
| JDTF+proximal humerus fracture/W-R method | 85.50 |
| JDTF+compressive spine fracture L1/W-R method | 78.00 |
| JDTF+compressive spine fracture L3/W-R method | 85.00 |
| JDTF+compressive spine fracture S1/W-R method | 87.50 |
Tongue-type fracture;
Westhues-Rąpała;
joint depression-type fracture;
minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous stabilization.
Comparison of FAOS scores according to type of fracture.
| Fracture | Average FAOS score | SD | N | Z | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTF | 83.6 | 12.6 | 10 | 2.0113 | 0.0443 |
| JDTF | 79.7 | 9.4 | 41 |
Standard deviation;
number of patients;
Mann-Whitney U test;
probability value;
tongue-type fracture;
joint depression-type fracture.