Literature DB >> 32346228

Cranial Vault Defects and Deformities Resulting from Combat-Related Gunshot, Blast and Splinter Injuries: How Best to Deal with Them.

Priya Jeyaraj1.   

Abstract

Combat-related gunshot and blast injuries of the craniomaxillofacial region present a unique and challenging situation for the maxillofacial and reconstructive surgeon. The devastating cosmetic deformities and severe functional debility ensuing as a result of extensive hard and soft tissue disruption caused by these highly complex injuries, can have disastrous consequences, unless managed in a swift and efficient manner, by a multidisciplinary team approach. Large calvarial defects and deformities are frequent sequelae of these injuries and could result from shattering of the cranial vault by the force of an exploding shell, mine or improvised explosive device, or due to penetration of the skull by the projectile, such as a bullet, flying splinters or shrapnel. It could also result from the decompressive craniectomy carried out in these patients as a neurosurgical procedure to deal with the traumatic brain injury sustained. Management of such injuries is significantly different from that of other craniomaxillofacial injuries, owing to the quantum and severity of hard and soft tissue destruction encountered in the former and also the need to deal with aspects such as splinters from the projectile deeply embedded within vital structures such as the delicate brain tissue and meninges. Further, restoration of the lost structural and functional integrity of the cranial vault using the most suitable cranioplasty material, is imperative to provide protection to the vulnerable and vital cranial contents. Correction of the cranial deformity is also essential from an esthetic and psychosocial standpoint, to restore the morale of the patient. The present study elaborates the immediate/primary management as well as the secondary/definitive management of blast and ballistic head injury patients. Comprehensive treatment and rehabilitation of these patients, including reconstruction of extensive calvarial defects and deformities, resulting either directly or indirectly from combat injuries, have been described in detail. This study also aims to analyze, review and reassess the currently accepted management perspectives and treatment protocols of combat-related cranial injuries and proposes a useful algorithm to best manage them. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D Dynamic Titanium mesh implant; Autologous calvarial bone flap; Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) injury; Cranioplasty; Decompressive craniectomy (DC); Fronto–temporo–parietal craniectomy; Gunshot wound (GSW); Improvised explosive device (IED) blast; Splinter and shrapnel injury; Traumatic brain injury (TBI)

Year:  2019        PMID: 32346228      PMCID: PMC7176805          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01258-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  36 in total

1.  Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurosurg       Date:  1999-09-24

2.  The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection--a case series of 82 patients.

Authors:  Dushan Thavarajah; Patricia De Lacy; Ahmed Hussien; Adrian Sugar
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 1.596

3.  The mechanisms of primary infection of bullet wounds.

Authors:  F P Thoresby; H M Darlow
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Gunshot wounds to the mandible and midface: evaluation, treatment, and avoidance of complications.

Authors:  R D Cole; J D Browne; C D Phipps
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Decompressive craniectomy and early cranioplasty for the management of severe head injury: a prospective multicenter study on 147 patients.

Authors:  Salvatore Chibbaro; Fedreico Di Rocco; Giuseppe Mirone; Marco Fricia; Orphee Makiese; Paolo Di Emidio; Antonio Romano; Eric Vicaut; Alina Menichelli; Alisha Reiss; Joaquim Mateo; Didier Payen; Jean Pierre Guichard; Bernard George; Damien Bresson
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Ji-Yao Jiang; Wei Xu; Wei-Ping Li; Wen-Hui Xu; Jun Zhang; Ying-Hui Bao; Yu-Hua Ying; Qi-Zhong Luo
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Sinking skin flap syndrome: a case of improved cerebral blood flow after cranioplasty.

Authors:  Tsukasa Isago; Motohiro Nozaki; Yuji Kikuchi; Takashi Honda; Hiroaki Nakazawa
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Neurological improvement after cranioplasty - analysis by transcranial doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  Jinn-Rung Kuo; Che-Chuan Wang; Chung-Ching Chio; Tain-Junn Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  Decompressive craniectomy as the primary surgical intervention for hemorrhagic contusion.

Authors:  Abel Po-Hao Huang; Yong-Kwang Tu; Yi-Hsin Tsai; Yuan-Shen Chen; Wei-Chen Hong; Chi-Cheng Yang; Lu-Ting Kuo; I-Chang Su; She-Hao Huang; Sheng-Jean Huang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Neurological recovery after cranioplasty.

Authors:  D H Segal; J S Oppenheim; J A Murovic
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.