Literature DB >> 32346186

Percepciones y creencias sobre criopreservación embrionaria en mujeres y hombres que se realizan técnicas de reproducción asistida en Santiago, Chile.

Marissa Velarde1, Sofía P Salas1,2, Rosario Domínguez3, Teresa López3, Pablo Céspedes4, Irene Furman4, Anita Godoy4, Magdalena Castro5, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJETIVE: Although embryo cryopreservation is frequently used as part of assisted reproductive technology, quantitave information addressing how infertile couples live the experience of having cryopreserved embryos is lacking in Chile. The aim of this study is to examine men and women's perception and beliefs regarding their cryopreserved embryos, as well as their perspective on embryo donation and disposition.
Methods: 153 women and men with frozen embryos from a public hospital, Instituto de Investigactiones Materno Infantil, and a private clinic, Clínica Las Condes, in Santiago, Chile, responded between May 2015 and May 2016 to an anonymous online survey addressing their perceptions and beliefs concerning their cryopreserved embryos.
RESULTS: Respondents considered their frozen embryos to be equivalent to a child (53.2%) or a potential child (40.7%). Only 8% regard them as an organized group of cells. Over 60% of respondents disagree with destroying surplus embryos or using them for research. Participants from the public hospital are more willing to donate their embryos to another couple than those from the private center (61% vs 40%; P=0.016); 34% of respondents agreed to donate surplus embryos to same sex couples.
CONCLUSION: This study reveals that Chilean couples are emotionally bound to their frozen embryos, and that discarding them is not an option. The results from this survey will help strengthen counseling for couples to enable them to make informed decisions regarding their surplus embryos.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted Reproductive Technology; Cryopreserved embryos; Embryo disposal; In Vitro Fertilization; Patient attitudes

Year:  2018        PMID: 32346186      PMCID: PMC7188406          DOI: 10.4067/s0717-75262018000100027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol        ISSN: 0048-766X


  16 in total

Review 1.  The social implications of embryo cryopreservation.

Authors:  Brandon J Bankowski; Anne D Lyerly; Ruth R Faden; Edward E Wallach
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Patients' attitudes to their embryos and their destiny: social conditioning?

Authors:  Sheryl de Lacey
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 5.237

3.  Assisted reproductive techniques in Latin America: The Latin American Registry, 2013.

Authors:  Fernando Zegers-Hochschild; Juan Enrique Schwarze; Javier A Crosby; Carolina Musri; Maria Teresa Urbina
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-05-01

4.  [Opinion survey on the use of assisted reproductive technologies applied to inhabitants of Santiago, Chile].

Authors:  Florencia Herrera; Berta Teitelbom; Moisés Russo; Sofía P Salas; Fernando Zegers Hochschild
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.553

5.  (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments.

Authors:  Sarah Parry
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Leesa Tinney
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan.

Authors:  Osamu Ishihara; Ryuichiro Araki; Akira Kuwahara; Atsuo Itakura; Hidekazu Saito; G David Adamson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Karen Steinhauser; Corrine Voils; Emily Namey; Carolyn Alexander; Brandon Bankowski; Robert Cook-Deegan; William C Dodson; Elena Gates; Emily S Jungheim; Peter G McGovern; Evan R Myers; Barbara Osborn; William Schlaff; Jeremy Sugarman; James A Tulsky; David Walmer; Ruth R Faden; Edward Wallach
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Defining embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Frozen in perpetuity: 'abandoned embryos' in Canada.

Authors:  Alana Cattapan; Françoise Baylis
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.