Kaiyin Qu1, Shihua Mao2, Jaeseong Li3, Jian Wang1,2, Guang Ouyang1,2, Zhi Wang1, Zhibiao Wang4,5, Yu Xiong1,6, Lian Zhang4,5. 1. Department of Gynecology, Chongqing Haifu Hospital, Chongqing, China. 2. Department of Gynecology, Three Gorges Central Hospital, Chongqing, China. 3. Aegisroen Obstetric Gynaecology Clinic, Seoul, Korea. 4. State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Engineering in Medicine Co-Founded by Chongqing and the Ministry of Science and Technology, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing, China. 5. Collaborative Innovation Center for Minimally-Invasive and Noninvasive Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 6. Department of Gynecology, Chongqing Angel Women's & Children's Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) for uterine fibroids on ovarian reserve in women of reproductive age.Materials and methods: From September 2015 to September 2017, 84 patients with uterine fibroids in reproductive age were enrolled from Chongqing Haifu Hospital, Three Gorges Central Hospital of Chongqing and Aegisroen obstetric gynecology Clinic of Seoul, Korea. Blood was collected before HIFU treatment and 6 months after USgHIFU treatment. The enzyme-linked immune analysis was used for assay of circulating anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). Results: All the 84 patients were successfully treated with USgHIFU and 67 patients completed the follow-up. The median age of the 67 patients was 38 years at the time of treatment. The median AMH value before and 6 months after treatment was 1.26 ng/mL and 1.27 ng/mL, respectively. Patients who completed AMH measurements 6 months after treatment were further classified into three groups based on age, including younger than 35 years, 36 to 40 years, and older than 40 years. The median AMH values before treatment were 3.04 ng/mL, 1.73 ng/mL and 0.87 ng/mL, and the corresponding values 6 months after treatment were 3.24, 1.44 and 0.75, respectively. A significant difference in AMH level was observed in the group of patients at the age between 36 and 40 years (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in AMH levels was observed in the other two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Based on our results, we conclude that USgHIFU has no influence on ovarian reserve.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) for uterine fibroids on ovarian reserve in women of reproductive age.Materials and methods: From September 2015 to September 2017, 84 patients with uterine fibroids in reproductive age were enrolled from Chongqing Haifu Hospital, Three Gorges Central Hospital of Chongqing and Aegisroen obstetric gynecology Clinic of Seoul, Korea. Blood was collected before HIFU treatment and 6 months after USgHIFU treatment. The enzyme-linked immune analysis was used for assay of circulating anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). Results: All the 84 patients were successfully treated with USgHIFU and 67 patients completed the follow-up. The median age of the 67 patients was 38 years at the time of treatment. The median AMH value before and 6 months after treatment was 1.26 ng/mL and 1.27 ng/mL, respectively. Patients who completed AMH measurements 6 months after treatment were further classified into three groups based on age, including younger than 35 years, 36 to 40 years, and older than 40 years. The median AMH values before treatment were 3.04 ng/mL, 1.73 ng/mL and 0.87 ng/mL, and the corresponding values 6 months after treatment were 3.24, 1.44 and 0.75, respectively. A significant difference in AMH level was observed in the group of patients at the age between 36 and 40 years (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in AMH levels was observed in the other two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Based on our results, we conclude that USgHIFU has no influence on ovarian reserve.
Authors: Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche; Sarah Rafiq; Rajesh Devassy; Hugo Christian Verhoeven; Sven Becker; Rudy Leon De Wilde Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-05 Impact factor: 4.241