Literature DB >> 3234505

Relation between muscle response onset and body segmental movements during postural perturbations in humans.

M H Woollacott1, C von Hosten, B Rösblad.   

Abstract

This study has examined the individual movements of the body segments of a group of 10 standing adults during anterior and posterior platform displacements (3 and 6 cm amplitudes), and compared body movements to neck and ankle muscle response onset times. Differences in the kinematics of movement were observed for anterior vs. posterior platform displacements: hip, shoulder, and head began to move much earlier for posterior compared to anterior platform movements. This could explain differences in postural muscle temporal response organization for the two directions of body movement. Though anterior/posterior neck and head displacements were late in comparison to neck flexor muscle response onset, small vertical movements of the shoulder and head occurred early (40 and 67 ms after platform movement onset). These movements were consistently directed upward for anterior platform displacements and downward for posterior platform displacements. In order to determine whether neck proprioceptors were responsible for response activation in the neck we repeated the experiment using a neck stabilization device, on one of our subjects. In this condition, we found normal neck muscle response latencies. This suggests that neck proprioceptors are not the primary contributors to the early neck muscle responses seen during horizontal support surface displacements. In studying the effect of repeated exposure to horizontal platform displacements we found a diminution in the amplitude and an increase in onset latencies in neck and antagonist ankle muscle responses over the sequence of 16 trials, in many of the subjects tested. This corresponded to smaller head accelerations, and smaller displacements of the head and shoulder in later trials in the experimental sequence. The result implies that these subjects changed their postural "set" during the course of the experiment, possibly by relaxing the muscles of the body to allow the viscoelastic properties of the lower body segments to absorb more of the impact of platform displacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3234505     DOI: 10.1007/bf00250604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Role of visual and static vestibular influences on dynamic posture control.

Authors:  H C Diener; J Dichgans; B Guschlbauer; M Bacher
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1986

2.  Organization of rapid responses to postural and locomotor-like perturbations of standing man.

Authors:  L M Nashner; M Woollacott; G Tuma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Muscle responses during sudden falls in man.

Authors:  R Greenwood; A Hopkins
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans.

Authors:  E A Keshner; M H Woollacott; B Debu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual and vestibular contributions to pitch sway stabilization in the ankle muscles of normals and patients with bilateral peripheral vestibular deficits.

Authors:  J H Allum; C R Pfaltz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neuromuscular control of posture in the infant and child: is vision dominant?

Authors:  M Woollacott; B Debu; M Mowatt
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.328

  8 in total
  18 in total

1.  The visual control of stability in children and adults: postural readjustments in a ground optical flow.

Authors:  Bernard Baumberger; Brice Isableu; Michelangelo Flückiger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of knee joint laxity on long-loop postural reflexes: evidence for a human capsular-hamstring reflex.

Authors:  R P Di Fabio; B Graf; M B Badke; A Breunig; K Jensen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Head-trunk coordination in elderly subjects during linear anterior-posterior translations.

Authors:  Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task-dependent components.

Authors:  R C Fitzpatrick; J L Taylor; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Influence of local sensory afference in the calibration of human balance responses.

Authors:  R P Di Fabio; M B Badke; A McEvoy; A Breunig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Two aspects of feedforward postural control: anticipatory postural adjustments and anticipatory synergy adjustments.

Authors:  Miriam Klous; Pavle Mikulic; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Postural adjustments in sitting humans following external perturbations: muscle activity and kinematics.

Authors:  H Forssberg; H Hirschfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Changes in motor activity and biomechanics during balance recovery following cutaneous and muscular deafferentation.

Authors:  P Thoumie; M C Do
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.