| Literature DB >> 32344610 |
Nabil A Alhakamy1,2,3,4, Usama A Fahmy1, Osama A A Ahmed1, Giuseppe Caruso5, Filippo Caraci5,6, Hani Z Asfour7, Muhammed A Bakhrebah8, Mohammad N Alomary8, Wesam H Abdulaal9, Solomon Z Okbazghi10, Ashraf B Abdel-Naim11, Basma G Eid11, Hibah M Aldawsari1, Mallesh Kurakula12, Amir I Mohamed13.
Abstract
This work aimed at improving the targeting and cytotoxicity of simvastatin (SMV) against colon cancer cells. SMV was encapsulated in chitosan polymers, followed by eudragit S100 microparticles. The release of SMV double coated microparticles was dependent on time and pH. At pH 7.4 maximum release was observed for 6 h. The efficiency of the double coat to target colonic tissues was confirmed using real-time X-ray radiography of iohexol dye. Entrapment efficiency and particle size were used in the characterization of the formula. Cytotoxicity of SMV microparticles against HCT-116 colon cancer cells was significantly improved as compared to raw SMV. Cell cycle analysis by flow cytomeric technique indicated enhanced accumulation of colon cancer cells in the G2/M phase. Additionally, a significantly higher cell fraction was observed in the pre-G phase, which highlighted enhancement of the proapoptotic activity of SMV prepared in the double coat formula. Assessment of annexin V staining was used for confirmation. Cell fraction in early, late and total cell death were significantly elevated. This was accompanied by a significant elevation of cellular caspase 3 activity. In conclusion, SMV-loaded chitosan coated with eudragit S100 formula exhibited improved colon targeting and enhanced cytotoxicity and proapoptotic activity against HCT-116 colon cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; drug release; microparticles; mucoadhesion; simvastatin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32344610 PMCID: PMC7231066 DOI: 10.3390/md18040226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1SEM images of characterized simvastatin (SMV)-loaded chitosan microparticles coated with Eudragit S100 (SMV-CHIT-ES MPs) at various magnification powers: 180× (A) 800× (B) and 3000× (C) showing SMV-CH MCPs entrapped within a CHIT-ES100 coat.
Figure 2SMV release from SMV-CHIT-ES 100MPs at pH 1.2 for 2 h, pH 4.5 from 2 to 4 h, and pH 7.4 from 4 to 24 h.
Figure 3IC50 of the raw SMV, Plain MPs and SMV-CH-E S100 MPs in the HCT-116 cell line, as well as Staurosporine (STU). *, Significantly different, (p < 0.05) compared to Plain; #, Significantly different (p < 0.05) compared to SMV.
Figure 4The impact of SMV-CHIT-ES100 MPs on HCT-116 cell cycle phases. (A) Control; (B) Plain MPs; (C) SMV-raw; (D) SMV-CHIT-ES100 MPs; (E) Graphic representations of each phase. *, Significantly different from control cells at p < 0.05; #, Significantly different from Plain MPs at p < 0.05; $, Significantly different from raw SMV at p < 0.05.
Figure 5Impact of SMV-CHIT-ES100 MPs on the annexin V FITC positive-staining HCT-116 cells. (A) Control; (B) Plain MPs; (C) SMV-raw; (D) SMV-CHIT-ES100 MPs; (E) Graphical representations of each phase. *, Significantly different from control cells at p < 0.05; #, Significantly different from Plain MPs at p < 0.05; $, Significantly different from raw SMV at p < 0.05.
Figure 6Impact of Plain MPs, SMV-raw, SMV-CHIT-ES100 MPs on caspase 3 enzyme concentrations in HCT-116 cells. *, Significantly different from control cells at p < 0.05; #, Significantly different from Plain MPs at p < 0.05; $, Significantly different from raw SMV at p < 0.05.
Figure 7X-ray photographs of (control) after 15 (A), 45 (B) and 60 min (C) and for SMV-CH-E S100 MPs after 3 (D), 6 (E) and 9 h (F).