Literature DB >> 32344565

Self-Collection for Cervical Screening Programs: From Research to Reality.

David Hawkes1,2,3, Marco H T Keung1, Yanping Huang1, Tracey L McDermott1, Joanne Romano1, Marion Saville1,4,5, Julia M L Brotherton1,5,6.   

Abstract

In 2018, there were an estimated 570,000 new cases of cervical cancer globally, with most of them occurring in women who either had no access to cervical screening, or had not participated in screening in regions where programs are available. Where programs are in place, a major barrier for women across many cultures has been the requirement to undergo a speculum examination. With the emergence of HPV-based primary screening, the option of self-collection (where the woman takes the sample from the vagina herself) may overcome this barrier, given that such samples when tested using a PCR-based HPV assay have similar sensitivity for the detection of cervical pre-cancers as practitioner-collected cervical specimens. Other advantages of HPV-based screening using self-collection, beyond the increase in acceptability to women, include scalability, efficiency, and high negative predictive value, allowing for long intervals between negative tests. Self-collection will be a key strategy for the successful scale up of cervical screening programs globally in response to the WHO call for all countries to work towards the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. This review will examine self-collection for HPV-based cervical screening including the collection devices, assays and possible routine laboratory processes considering how they can be utilized in cervical screening programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical screening; diagnostic testing; human papillomavirus; self-collection

Year:  2020        PMID: 32344565     DOI: 10.3390/cancers12041053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  7 in total

1.  Acceptability of Human Papilloma Virus Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Cohort of Patients from Romania (Stage 2).

Authors:  Mihaela Grigore; Ingrid-Andrada Vasilache; Petru Cianga; Daniela Constantinescu; Odetta Duma; Roxana Daniela Matasariu; Ioana-Sadiye Scripcariu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Review of the Standard and Advanced Screening, Staging Systems and Treatment Modalities for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Siaw Shi Boon; Ho Yin Luk; Chuanyun Xiao; Zigui Chen; Paul Kay Sheung Chan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Thousands of Women's Lives Depend on the Improvement of Poland's Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Education as Well as Better Networking Strategies Amongst Cervical Cancer Facilities.

Authors:  Marcin Śniadecki; Patryk Poniewierza; Paulina Jaworek; Ada Szymańczyk; Gorm Andersson; Maria Stasiak; Michał Brzeziński; Małgorzata Bońkowska; Magdalena Krajewska; Joanna Konarzewska; Dagmara Klasa-Mazurkiewicz; Paweł Guzik; Dariusz Grzegorz Wydra
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26

4.  Self-sampling as the principal modality for population based cervical screening: Five-year follow-up of the PaVDaG study.

Authors:  Grazyna A Stanczuk; Heather Currie; William Forson; Gwendoline Baxter; James Lawrence; Allan Wilson; Timothy Palmer; Marc Arbyn; Kate Cuschieri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 7.316

5.  Effect of telephone-based health education intervention models on cervical cancer screening compliance: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yinchun Liu; Qiang Zhang; Yanli Chen; Chun Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Human Papillomavirus Types Associated with Cervical Dysplasia among HIV- and Non-HIV-Infected Women Attending Reproductive Health Clinics in Eastern Kenya.

Authors:  James Kinoti Njue; Margaret Muturi; Lucy Kamau; Raphael Lwembe
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A Six-Year Gynecological Follow-Up of Immunosuppressed Women with a High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection.

Authors:  Aleksandra Wielgos; Bronisława Pietrzak; Barbara Suchonska; Mariusz Sikora; Lidia Rudnicka; Miroslaw Wielgos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.