Literature DB >> 32343637

Anxiety Impedes Adaptive Social Learning Under Uncertainty.

Amrita Lamba1, Michael J Frank1,2, Oriel FeldmanHall1,2.   

Abstract

Very little is known about how individuals learn under uncertainty when other people are involved. We propose that humans are particularly tuned to social uncertainty, which is especially noisy and ambiguous. Individuals exhibiting less tolerance for uncertainty, such as those with anxiety, may have greater difficulty learning in uncertain social contexts and therefore provide an ideal test population to probe learning dynamics under uncertainty. Using a dynamic trust game and a matched nonsocial task, we found that healthy subjects (n = 257) were particularly good at learning under negative social uncertainty, swiftly figuring out when to stop investing in an exploitative social partner. In contrast, subjects with anxiety (n = 97) overinvested in exploitative partners. Computational modeling attributed this pattern to a selective reduction in learning from negative social events and a failure to enhance learning as uncertainty rises-two mechanisms that likely facilitate adaptive social choice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian reinforcement learning; anxiety; open data; social learning; trust game; uncertainty sensitivity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32343637     DOI: 10.1177/0956797620910993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  5 in total

1.  A neural and behavioral trade-off between value and uncertainty underlies exploratory decisions in normative anxiety.

Authors:  Kristoffer C Aberg; Ido Toren; Rony Paz
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 13.437

2.  Intolerance of uncertainty modulates brain-to-brain synchrony during politically polarized perception.

Authors:  Jeroen M van Baar; David J Halpern; Oriel FeldmanHall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Computational Psychiatry Needs Time and Context.

Authors:  Peter F Hitchcock; Eiko I Fried; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 4.  The computational challenge of social learning.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; Matthew R Nassar
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Impaired learning to dissociate advantageous and disadvantageous risky choices in adolescents.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Jessica V Schaaf; Ingmar Visser; Hilde M Huizenga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.