Literature DB >> 32343368

Is the use of laparoscopy in a COVID-19 epidemic free of risk?

L Schwarz1,2, J J Tuech1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32343368      PMCID: PMC7267661          DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


× No keyword cloud information.
Editor Among the problems raised by the COVID-19 pandemic, there is the increased risk of exposure of healthcare workers to the virus. The choice between laparotomy or laparoscopy is subject to debate among surgeons. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) mentions the possibility of viral contamination during laparoscopy via possible release of virus in the form of an aerosol with CO2. With current knowledge, the virus has been identified in respiratory tract samples, in faeces, blood, serum, saliva and lymph, as detailed in the seventh update of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Studies have suggested that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted through the air via aerosols formed during medical procedures. A chimney effect can cause a jet of air to be blown through the trocars. Consequently, operating theatre staff can be exposed to a high concentration of cells, burns, infectious particles and, in particular, virus. Common routes of transmission for new coronaviruses include direct transmission (coughing, sneezing and inhalation of droplets) and contact transmission (contact with oral, nasal and ocular mucous membranes). Risk of transmission of COVID-19 during laparoscopy remains theoretical but cannot be excluded completely, with regards to oral, nasal and ocular exposure. Laparoscopy has the advantage of reducing the negative impact of surgery on respiratory function. However, as mentioned above, aerosol released into the operating theatre during or at the end of the intervention can contaminate healthcare workers. If the laparoscopic approach is indicated, it is recommended: to check all instruments and the proper functioning of the suction system, which must be used systematically; to use balloon trocars and create suitable holes for the introduction of leak-free trocars; not to create a leak in the presence of smoke obstructing the surgical field, but to extract this smoke using the vacuum suction device; and to aspirate the entire pneumoperitoneum before making an auxiliary incision and at the end of the procedure before removing the trocars. Laparoscopy should be proposed by an experienced surgeon. In case of doubt or lack of experience in laparoscopy, a laparotomy should be favoured. At this time, risk of viral contamination of the pneumoperitoneum is not validated. In line with SAGES recommendations, we could state that there is a theoretical risk that should be weighed against the benefit of laparoscopy. It seems important to remind surgeons of the safety measures they must apply during laparoscopy.
  3 in total

1.  2019-nCoV transmission through the ocular surface must not be ignored.

Authors:  Cheng-Wei Lu; Xiu-Fen Liu; Zhi-Fang Jia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Safe management of surgical smoke in the age of COVID-19.

Authors:  N G Mowbray; J Ansell; J Horwood; J Cornish; P Rizkallah; A Parker; P Wall; A Spinelli; J Torkington
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.939

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  COVID-19 outbreak and the practice of surgery: do we need to change?

Authors:  Simone Arolfo; Francesco Velluti; Renato Romagnoli; Giacomo Lo Secco; Marco Ettore Allaix; Mario Morino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission in postoperative infection and mortality: analysis of 14 798 procedures.

Authors:  J A Elliott; R Kenyon; G Kelliher; A E Gillis; S Tierney; P F Ridgway
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Robotics and AI for Teleoperation, Tele-Assessment, and Tele-Training for Surgery in the Era of COVID-19: Existing Challenges, and Future Vision.

Authors:  Navid Feizi; Mahdi Tavakoli; Rajni V Patel; S Farokh Atashzar
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-04-14

4.  COVID-19 pandemic impact on gynaecological cancers: a perspective.

Authors:  C Uwins; G Bhandoria
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Solving the problems of gas leakage at laparoscopy.

Authors:  R A Cahill; J Dalli; M Khan; M Flood; K Nolan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Safe Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery during COVID Times.

Authors:  Prakash Harikant Trivedi; Soumil Prakash Trivedi; Nilesh Maruti Ghadge; Dinesh Popatlal Bajani; Aditi Soumil Trivedi
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-12-28

7.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Bariatric Surgery: Results from a Worldwide Survey.

Authors:  Ioannis I Lazaridis; Marko Kraljević; Romano Schneider; Jennifer M Klasen; Dimitrios Schizas; Ralph Peterli; Lilian Kow; Tarik Delko
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.479

8.  Laparoscopic Surgery and the debate on its safety during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of recommendations.

Authors:  Michael El Boghdady; Beatrice Marianne Ewalds-Kvist
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.632

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.