Literature DB >> 32343335

Primary Care-Relevant Interventions for Tobacco and Nicotine Use Prevention and Cessation in Children and Adolescents: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Shelley Selph1, Carrie Patnode2, Steffani R Bailey3, Miranda Pappas1, Ryan Stoner1, Roger Chou1.   

Abstract

Importance: Interventions to discourage the use of tobacco products (including electronic nicotine delivery systems or e-cigarettes) among children and adolescents may help decrease tobacco-related illness and injury. Objective: To update the 2013 review on primary care-relevant interventions for tobacco use prevention and cessation in children and adolescents to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, PsyINFO, and EMBASE (September 1, 2012, to June 25, 2019), with surveillance through February 7, 2020. Study Selection: Primary care-relevant studies; randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized controlled intervention studies of children and adolescents up to age 18 years for cessation and age 25 years for prevention. Trials comparing behavioral or pharmacological interventions with no or a minimal tobacco use intervention control group (eg, usual care, attention control, wait list) were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: One investigator abstracted data and a second investigator checked data abstraction for accuracy. Two investigators independently assessed study quality. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Tobacco use initiation; tobacco use cessation; health outcomes; harms.
Results: Twenty-four randomized clinical trials (N = 44 521) met inclusion criteria. Behavioral interventions were associated with decreased likelihood of cigarette smoking initiation compared with control interventions at 7 to 36 months' follow-up (13 trials, n = 21 700; 7.4% vs 9.2%; relative risk [RR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]). There was no statistically significant difference between behavioral interventions and controls in smoking cessation when trials were restricted to smokers (9 trials, n = 2516; 80.7% vs 84.1% continued smoking; RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.93-1.01]). There were no significant benefits of medication on likelihood of smoking cessation in 2 trials of bupropion at 26 weeks (n = 523; 17% [300 mg] and 6% [150 mg] vs 10% [placebo]; 24% [150 mg] vs 28% [placebo]) and 1 trial of nicotine replacement therapy at 12 months (n = 257; 8.1% vs 8.2%). One trial each (n = 2586 and n = 1645) found no beneficial intervention effect on health outcomes or on adult smoking. No trials of prevention in young adults were identified. Few trials addressed prevention or cessation of tobacco products other than cigarettes; no trials evaluated effects of interventions on e-cigarette use. There were few trials of pharmacotherapy, and they had small sample sizes. Conclusions and Relevance: Behavioral interventions may reduce the likelihood of smoking initiation in nonsmoking children and adolescents. Research is needed to identify effective behavioral interventions for adolescents who smoke cigarettes or who use other tobacco products and to understand the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32343335     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.3332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  10 in total

Review 1.  Protecting children and adolescents against the risks of vaping.

Authors:  Nicholas Chadi; Ellie Vyver; Richard E Bélanger
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 2.  La protection des enfants et des adolescents contre les risques du vapotage.

Authors:  Nicholas Chadi; Ellie Vyver; Richard E Bélanger
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 3.  Smokeless tobacco and cigarette smoking: chemical mechanisms and cancer prevention.

Authors:  Stephen S Hecht; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 69.800

4.  Inability to Recruit Adolescents for a Vaping Cessation Clinical Trial Within a Large Pediatric Health System.

Authors:  Brian P Jenssen; Chloe Hannan; Mary Kate Kelly; Thomas Ylioja; Robert A Schnoll; Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Pilot Study of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Cessation Methods.

Authors:  Michelle Sahr; Shelby Kelsh; Noah Blower; Minji Sohn
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-14

6.  Attitudes & behaviors toward the management of tobacco smoking patients: qualitative study with French primary care physicians.

Authors:  Guillaume Coindard; Michaël Acquadro; Raphaël Chaumont; Benoit Arnould; Philippe Boisnault; Rachel Collignon-Portes; Didier Duhot; François Raineri; Béatrice Tugaut; Henri-Jean Aubin
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-01-14

7.  Health Care Professionals' Clinical Skills to Address Vaping and e-Cigarette Use by Patients: Needs and Interest Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Mary Metcalf; Karen Rossie; Katie Stokes; Bradley Tanner
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-11

8.  Electronic Vapor Product Use and Levels of Physical Activity Among High School Students in Georgia.

Authors:  Janani Rajbhandari-Thapa; Kiran Thapa; Yan Li; Justin B Ingels; Lu Shi; Donglan Zhang; Ye Shen; Kathryn Chiang
Journal:  Tob Use Insights       Date:  2022-07-01

9.  E-cigarette use among high school students in the United States prior to the COVID-19 pandemic: Trends, correlates, and sources of acquisition.

Authors:  Mohammadhassan Mirbolouk; Ellen Boakye; Olufunmilayo Obisesan; Albert D Osei; Omar Dzaye; Ngozi Osuji; John Erhabor; Andrew C Stokes; Omar El-Shahawy; Carlos J Rodriguez; Glenn A Hirsch; Emelia J Benjamin; Andrew P DeFilippis; Rose Marie Robertson; Aruni Bhatnagar; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 10.  Addressing adolescent substance use with a public health prevention framework: the case for harm reduction.

Authors:  James Michael Winer; Amy M Yule; Scott E Hadland; Sarah M Bagley
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.