Literature DB >> 32342992

Optimal timing of chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection of glioblastoma: Stratification by validated prognostic classification.

Robert H Press1, Sarah L Shafer2, Renjian Jiang2, Zachary S Buchwald3, Mustafa Abugideiri3, Sibo Tian3, Tiffany M Morgan3, Madhusmita Behera2, Soma Sengupta4, Alfredo D Voloschin5, Jeffrey J Olson6, Shaakir Hasan1, Deborah T Blumenthal7, Walter J Curran3, Bree R Eaton3, Hui-Kuo G Shu3, Jim Zhong3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the time to initiate chemoradiation (CRT) after surgical resection of glioblastoma have been conflicting. To better define the effect that the timing of adjuvant treatment may have on outcomes, the authors examined patients within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) stratified by a validated prognostic classification system.
METHODS: Patients with glioblastoma in the NCDB who underwent surgery and CRT from 2004 through 2013 were analyzed. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class (III, IV, V) was extrapolated for the cohort. Time intervals were grouped weekly, with weeks 4 to 5 serving as the reference category for analyses. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing, and multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards regression were performed.
RESULTS: In total, 30,414 patients were included. RPA classes III, IV, and V contained 5250, 20,855, and 4309 patients, respectively. On MVA, no time point after week 5 was associated with a change in overall survival for the entire cohort or for any RPA class subgroup. The periods of weeks 0 to 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.36), >1 to 2 (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.16-1.31), and >2 to 3 (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15) demonstrated slightly worse overall survival (all P < .03). The detriment to early initiation was consistent across each RPA class subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: The current data provide insight into the optimal timing of CRT in patients with glioblastoma and describe RPA class-specific outcomes. In general, short delays beyond 5 weeks did not negatively affect outcomes, whereas early initiation before 3 weeks may be detrimental.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjuvant; chemoradiotherapy; glioblastoma; radiotherapy; timing of therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32342992     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

1.  Optimal timing of radiotherapy following brain metastases surgery.

Authors:  Nasser K Yaghi; Stephanie Radu; Joseph G Nugent; David J Mazur-Hart; Brandi W Pang; Stephen G Bowden; Blair Murphy; Seunggu J Han
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 2.  Advances in Nanotechnology-Based Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Ming Zhang; Chaoyong Liu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Durable 5-year local control for resected brain metastases with early adjuvant SRS: the effect of timing on intended-field control.

Authors:  Evan D Bander; Melissa Yuan; Anne S Reiner; Katherine S Panageas; Åse M Ballangrud; Cameron W Brennan; Kathryn Beal; Viviane Tabar; Nelson S Moss
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-01-21

Review 4.  EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood.

Authors:  Michael Weller; Martin van den Bent; Matthias Preusser; Emilie Le Rhun; Jörg C Tonn; Giuseppe Minniti; Martin Bendszus; Carmen Balana; Olivier Chinot; Linda Dirven; Pim French; Monika E Hegi; Asgeir S Jakola; Michael Platten; Patrick Roth; Roberta Rudà; Susan Short; Marion Smits; Martin J B Taphoorn; Andreas von Deimling; Manfred Westphal; Riccardo Soffietti; Guido Reifenberger; Wolfgang Wick
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Sex-specific aspects of epidemiology, molecular genetics and outcome: primary brain tumours.

Authors:  Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Weller
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.