Literature DB >> 32342866

Cancer patients in Covid-19 era: Swimming against the tide.

Fabiana Gregucci1, Morena Caliandro1, Alessia Surgo2, Roberta Carbonara1, Ilaria Bonaparte1, Alba Fiorentino1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32342866      PMCID: PMC7129219          DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


× No keyword cloud information.
Receiving diagnosis of cancer leads the establishment of several psychological dynamics: fear of dying, uncertainty, loss of control, change in interpersonal relationships and self-image. In this patients’ setting, the psychological structure often represents a “baggage” during their oncological treatments, which are “LIFE-SAVING” and cannot be postponed. In the present context, SARS-CoV-2 infection has a significant impact on everyone's daily life, due to some recommendations to reduce its spread (wash your hands, avoid contact with other people, keep a distance, remain at home) [1]. These latter recommendations could have a negative impact on the life of oncological patients. In fact, they experience a different emotional state between the need to undergo LIFE-SAVING treatments (often in a COVID-Hospital) and the fear of exposing themselves to the contagion risk. Radiotherapy (RT) provides significant survival benefit for patient affected by cancer [2], but “How can daily RT session be lived by patients?”. Today, undergoing RT takes on a different meaning. It is necessary to put it in a world that swims against the tide: “The healthy people stay at home while I must go out! Why me??? I am weak!. Based on this background, not only the organizational setup but also the psychological approach are necessary in Radiation Oncology Department [3], [4]. The sense of loneliness affects all oncological patients and this feeling reduces compliance to life-saving treatments for fear of infection losing sight of the importance of care. On the other hand, it is important not to underestimate the dependence that patients can develop towards the following therapeutic plan. It is necessary to help the patients to dimension the various dynamics of life, cognitively and emotionally, at hospital and at home. Small spontaneous groups, in which patients have the opportunity to express their emotions were useful. A real psycho-education could be performed comparing emotions (sadness, anger, fear, anxiety) to their somatic reactions (headache, stomachache, difficulty relaxing and sleeping). Conversely, during the individual psychological interview, the mechanisms of thought that can trigger should be evaluated: 1) catastrophizing (I could get die), 2) perception of responsibility (I could be infected and infect others), 3) feeling of vulnerability (I am powerless), 4) pay attention to negative aspects (data on the Covid-19 infected/deaths). In response to these thoughts, the behaviors implemented may be different: 1) cognitive (I don't think about it); 2) behavioral avoidance (I get distracted by doing many activities); 3) relational (difficulty in emotional expression). The sense of powerlessness and Covid-19 physical suffering (deterioration and transformation of the body image, breathing difficulties and dying in solitude) scare and could become generalized anxiety. Easy tools, including Mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques, could be performed to manage stress, pain perception, reducing physical symptoms, mood and sleep disturbances [5]. They help to “observe” thoughts from a wider perspective, to be able to identify “thoughts” as “simple words” and not reflections of reality. In relationship between stressful events and diseases, including cancer, the possibility of receiving support from a reference figure both in the intimate and extended environment is a relevant aspect. Covid-19 infection leads to the loss of an essential part in the inter-human relationship: physical contact that until now represented a resource, today represents a danger. The hug that until recently was the expression of closeness, care, container of joys and fears, is denied. Thus, in the field of RT, the “touch” (mandatory for positioning patients) could be experienced as a danger [6] or a consolation for the cancer patient. Most patients, during RT, reported feeling of protection by the physician, the radiotherapist, the nurse who wears gloves and masks: “someone takes care of me concretely” in this society where trusting, for some people, is experienced as difficult. Other patients report fear of being touched, while being carefully positioned on the treatment table. “How to manage the need for physical contact and the attitude that derives from it?” In our department, treatment rooms are decorated with Italian landscape to reduce anxiety [Fig. 1 ], and the radiotherapist asks each patient for a favorite song, a melody that helps to relax, to recreate with mind episodes of life in which patient has experienced a state of well-being, thus regulating emotional intensity and managing to complete the treatment session.
Fig. 1

Treatment rooms.

Treatment rooms. In conclusion, in the present Covid-19 emergency, the psychological approach for cancer patients is mandatory to prevent the fear of infection from causing death by taking the patients away from their life-saving treatments.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.
  15 in total

1.  Predictors of poor precautionary practices towards COVID-19 among cancer patients.

Authors:  Abdul R Jazieh; Assia A Bensalem; Adda Bounedjar; Zineb Benbrahim; Mohamed O Alorabi; Atlal M Abusanad; Emad M Tashkandi; Muath Ama Alnassar; Abdul Rad El Kinge; Sana Al-Sukhun; Abdullah Alsharm; Hassan Errihani; Nafisa A Abdelhafiez; Mohammad Alkaiyat; Hoda Jradi
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  Bibliometric Analysis of Literature on Physical Activity and COVID-19.

Authors:  Apichai Wattanapisit; Manas Kotepui; Sanhapan Wattanapisit; Noah Crampton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Colleen A Hanlon; Adam J Woods; Bernadette T Gillick; Leigh Charvet; Claus Lamm; Graziella Madeo; Adrienn Holczer; Jorge Almeida; Andrea Antal; Mohammad Reza Ay; Chris Baeken; Daniel M Blumberger; Salvatore Campanella; Joan A Camprodon; Lasse Christiansen; Colleen Loo; Jennifer T Crinion; Paul Fitzgerald; Luigi Gallimberti; Peyman Ghobadi-Azbari; Iman Ghodratitoostani; Roland H Grabner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Akimasa Hirata; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; Evgeny Krupitsky; Paola Marangolo; Ester M Nakamura-Palacios; Weronika Potok; Samir K Praharaj; Christian C Ruff; Gottfried Schlaug; Hartwig R Siebner; Charlotte J Stagg; Axel Thielscher; Nicole Wenderoth; Ti-Fei Yuan; Xiaochu Zhang; Hamed Ekhtiari
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Uncertainty upon uncertainty: supportive Care for Cancer and COVID-19.

Authors:  Annie M Young; Fredrick D Ashbury; Lidia Schapira; Florian Scotté; Carla I Ripamonti; Ian N Olver
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Stress and Symptom Burden in Oncology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Christine Miaskowski; Steven M Paul; Karin Snowberg; Maura Abbott; Hala Borno; Susan Chang; Lee M Chen; Bevin Cohen; Marilyn J Hammer; Stacey A Kenfield; Kord M Kober; Jon D Levine; Rachel Pozzar; Kim F Rhoads; Erin L Van Blarigan; Katherine Van Loon
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  To a new normal in radiation oncology: looking back and planning forward.

Authors:  Amelia Barcellini; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Francesca Dal Mas; Lorenzo Cobianchi; Renzo Corvò; Pat Price; Ester Orlandi
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.098

7.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncologists: Results of an International Study.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Jazieh; Anelisa K Coutinho; Assia A Bensalem; Abdullah A Alsharm; Hassan Errihani; Layth Mula-Hussain; Sana Al-Sukhun; Carlos A Sampaio-Filho; Ola M R Khorshid; Roselle B De Guzman; Mohammad O Alkaiyat; Hoda A Jradi
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-02

8.  Impact of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Lyon University Hospital Cancer Institute (IC-HCL).

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Belmont; Christophe Sajous; Amandine Bruyas; Sara Calattini; Stéphanie Cartalat; Marion Chauvenet; Marc Colombel; Stéphane Dalle; Tristan Dagonneau; Marie Darrason; Gilles Devouassoux; Michaël Duruisseaux; Marielle Guillet; Olivier Glehen; Pierre Philouze; François Tronc; Thomas Walter; Benoît You; Gilles Freyer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Cancer During the Coronavirus Pandemic - As if One Problem Was Not Enough!

Authors:  N Patni; A Hota; A Patni; P Misra
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  A retrospective evaluation of the value of COVID-19 screening and testing in patients with cancer: Aiming at a moving target.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Jazieh; Majed Alghamdi; Mohammad Alkaiyat; Sameera M Al Johani; Moussab Damlaj
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 7.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.