| Literature DB >> 32342642 |
Sebastian Jannas-Vela1,2, Shannon L Klingel1, Daniel T Cervone1, Kate A Wickham1, George J F Heigenhauser3, David M Mutch1, Graham P Holloway1, Lawrence L Spriet1.
Abstract
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have unique properties purported to influence several aspects of metabolism, including energy expenditure and protein function. Supplementing with n-3 PUFAs may increase whole-body resting metabolic rate (RMR), by enhancing Na+ /K+ ATPase (NKA) activity and reducing the efficiency of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) activity by inducing a Ca2+ leak-pump cycle. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of fish oil (FO) on RMR, substrate oxidation, and skeletal muscle SERCA and NKA pump function in healthy older individuals. Subjects (n = 16 females; n = 8 males; 65 ± 1 years) were randomly assigned into groups supplemented with either olive oil (OO) (5 g/day) or FO (5 g/day) containing 2 g/day eicosapentaenoic acid and 1 g/day docosahexaenoic acid for 12 weeks. Participants visited the laboratory for RMR and substrate oxidation measurements after an overnight fast at weeks 0 and 12. Skeletal muscle biopsies were taken during weeks 0 and 12 for analysis of NKA and SERCA function and protein content. There was a main effect of time with decrease in RMR (5%) and fat oxidation (18%) in both the supplementation groups. The kinetic parameters of SERCA and NKA maximal activity, as well as the expression of SR and NKA proteins, were not affected after OO and FO supplementation. In conclusion, these results suggest that FO supplementation is not effective in altering RMR, substrate oxidation, and skeletal muscle SERCA and NKA protein levels and activities, in healthy older men and women.Entities:
Keywords: Na+/K+ ATPase; SERCA; omega-3; resting metabolic rate; skeletal muscle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32342642 PMCID: PMC7186565 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1Consort figure illustrating participant flow through the study
Subject characteristics
| Olive oil ( | Fish oil ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 12 | Week 0 | Week 12 | |
| Age (y) | 66 ± 1 | — | 65 ± 1 | — |
| Height (m) | 1.68 ± 0.03 | — | 1.66 ± 0.03 | — |
| Body mass (kg) | 69.7 ± 3.8 | 70.4 ± 4.1 | 71.5 ± 3.7 | 71.3 ± 3.7 |
| Body fat (%) | 33.1 ± 2.5 | 33.7 ± 2.6 | 34.7 ± 1.9 | 35.2 ± 1.9 |
| Lean body mass (%) | 67.0 ± 2.5 | 66.3 ± 2.6 | 65.3 ± 1.9 | 64.8 ± 1.9 |
| VO2 (ml/min) | 226 ± 37 | 215 ± 37 | 230 ± 31 | 215 ± 30 |
| VCO2 (ml/min) | 175 ± 29 | 174 ± 33 | 182 ± 31 | 174 ± 29 |
| RER | 0.775 ± 0.056 | 0.810 ± 0.059 | 0.789 ± 0.047 | 0.808 ± 0.054 |
| Diet (kcal) | 1,864 ± 147 | 1,731 ± 110 | 1,784 ± 91 | 1,783 ± 402 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 51 ± 3 | 49 ± 2 | 50 ± 3 | 48 ± 3 |
| Fat (%) | 32 ± 2 | 33 ± 3 | 32 ± 3 | 32 ± 3 |
| Protein (%) | 17 ± 2 | 18 ± 2 | 18 ± 1 | 20 ± 2 |
All values are means ± SEM.
Abbreviation: RER, respiratory exchange ratio.
Main effect of time (p < .05).
Blood measures
| Olive oil ( | Fish oil ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 12 | Week 0 | Week 12 | |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.91 ± 0.08 | 4.85 ± 0.10 | 5.72 ± 0.56 | 5.93 ± 0.46 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.33 ± 0.22 | 1.24 ± 0.12 | 0.94 ± 0.08 | 0.80 ± 0.12 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.90 ± 0.45 | 5.50 ± 0.44 | 5.27 ± 0.39 | 5.34 ± 0.52 |
| HDL‐c (mmol/L) | 1.80 ± 0.13 | 1.70 ± 0.12 | 1.80 ± 0.11 | 1.99 ± 0.16 |
| LDL‐c (mmol/L) | 3.50 ± 0.38 | 3.24 ± 0.37 | 3.04 ± 0.32 | 2.98 ± 0.42 |
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 1.82 ± 0.78 | 1.98 ± 0.76 | 1.79 ± 0.48 | 0.81 ± 0.19 |
| EPA (% of total FAs) | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 3.43 ± 0.36 |
| DHA (% of total FAs) | 5.98 ± 0.31 | 5.96 ± 0.31 | 6.39 ± 0.24 | 8.28 ± 0.16 |
All values are means ± SEM.
Abbreviations: DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; FAs, fatty acids; HDL‐c, high‐density lipoprotein–cholesterol; hsCRP, high sensitivity C‐reactive protein; LDL‐c, low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol.
Main effect of group (p < .05).
Significant difference within group (p < .05).
Figure 2Resting metabolic rate (RMR) (a), carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation (b), and fat oxidation (c) before (Pre‐white bars) and after (Post‐black bars) olive oil and fish oil supplementation. Values are reported as means ± SEM. Data were analyzed by 2‐factor repeated‐measures ANOVA
Figure 3Maximal sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pump activity with ionophore before (Pre‐white bars) and after (Post‐black bars) supplementation with olive oil (n = 6) (a) and fish oil (n = 10) (b). Kinetic curve showing SERCA activity, maximal SERCA pump activity (inset), pCa50 (inset) Pre and Post supplementation with olive oil (n = 6) (c) and fish oil (n = 10) (d). Na+/K+ ATPase maximal activity Pre and Post supplementation with olive oil (n = 6) (e) and fish oil (n = 9) (f). Values are reported as means ± SEM. Data were analyzed by paired t test
Figure 4Expression of protein targets contributing to sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase (SERCA) and Na+/K+ ATPase (NKA) activities before (Pre‐white bars) and after (Post‐black bars) supplementation with olive oil (n = 7) and fish oil (n = 10). No effect of supplementation on the expression of SERCA 1a and 2a, calsequestrin 1 and 2 (CSQ1, CSQ2) (a, b); NKAα1, NKAα2, NKAβ1, NKAβ2, NKAβ3 (c, d). Values are reported as means ± SEM. Data were analyzed by paired t test