Literature DB >> 32342253

The association of primary tumor site with acute adverse event and efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy for cStage II/III esophageal cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG0909.

Shuichi Hironaka1, Azusa Komori2, Ryunosuke Machida3, Yoshinori Ito4, Hiroya Takeuchi5, Gakuto Ogawa3, Ken Kato6, Masakatsu Onozawa7, Keiko Minashi8, Tomonori Yano9, Kenichi Nakamura3, Takahiro Tsushima10, Hiroki Hara11, Isao Nozaki12, Takashi Ura13, Keisho Chin14, Haruhiko Fukuda3, Yuko Kitagawa15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: JCOG0909 is a phase II trial of definitive chemoradiotherapy including salvage treatment for cStage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer; the radiation field for elective regional lymph node irradiation, which can affect patient outcome and adverse event, varied based on the primary tumor site, i.e., upper (Ut), middle (Mt), and lower thoracic (Lt) esophagus. The impact of different primary sites on the safety and efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy in JCOG0909 is not well characterized.
METHODS: Patients were categorized into three groups (Ut, Mt, and Lt) according to the primary tumor location. We compared acute adverse events during definitive chemoradiotherapy, complete response (CR) rate, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) among the 3 groups.
RESULTS: Out of the 96 patients enrolled in JCOG0909 between April 2010 and August 2014, 94 patients (16, 59, and 19 patients in the Ut, Mt, and Lt groups, respectively) were included in this exploratory analysis. The proportion of patients with cStage III was 25% in the Ut, 37% in the Mt, and 47% in the Lt group. Grade 3-4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were more frequently observed in the Mt (66%, 54%, and 15%) and Lt groups (84%, 68%, and 16%) than in the Ut group (38%, 44%, and 0%). There was no significant between-group difference with respect to 3-year OS (73.3%, 77.9%, and 57.9%), 3-year PFS (60.0%, 59.3%, and 47.4%), or CR rate (62.5%, 62.7%, and 42.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: In JCOG0909, the incidence of severe hematological toxicity had a trend toward higher in the Mt and Lt than the Ut esophageal cancer; however, no remarkable difference by primary sites was observed with respect to efficacy endpoints.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiotherapy; Esophageal cancer; Location; Primary site

Year:  2020        PMID: 32342253     DOI: 10.1007/s10388-020-00741-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Esophagus        ISSN: 1612-9059            Impact factor:   4.230


  4 in total

1.  Impact of Regional Lymph Node Irradiation on Reducing Lymph Node Recurrence in Esophageal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Shigenobu Watanabe; Ichiro Ogino; Daisuke Shigenaga; Masaharu Hata
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-03-03

2.  Sarcopenia is associated with prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer after radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Junchao Qian; Youjiao Si; Ke Zhou; Yu Tian; Qisen Guo; Kaikai Zhao; Jinming Yu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Ideal Anatomical Landmark Points for Thoracic Esophagus Segmentation in the Chinese Population.

Authors:  Di Lu; Xiuyu Ji; Jintao Zhan; Jianxue Zhai; Tingxiao Fang; Siyang Feng; Xiguang Liu; Lin Yu; Zhiming Chen; Zhizhi Wang; Xuanzhen Wu; Sue Liu; Hua Wu; Kaican Cai
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-14

4.  Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Role of Definitive Radiotherapy for Primary Tumor in the Metastatic Setting.

Authors:  Li-Qing Li; Qing-Guo Fu; Wei-Dong Zhao; Yu-Dan Wang; Wan-Wan Meng; Ting-Shi Su
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.