Literature DB >> 32342166

Left Distal Transradial Access (ldTRA): A Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Distal Radial Artery Size.

Anastasia Hadjivassiliou1, Leandro Cardarelli-Leite1, Sabeena Jalal1, John Chung1, David Liu1, Stephen Ho1, Darren Klass2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess left radial artery size, technical feasibility and safety of ldTRA in the anatomical snuffbox for percutaneous image-guided procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed from November 2016 to June 2018 on all patients undergoing ldTRA for interventional radiology procedures.
RESULTS: A total of 287 patients (91 female and 196 male), aged 18-94 years (mean age 64 years), were included. 389 procedures were performed which included hepatic chemoembolization (n = 161), selective internal radiation therapy Y-90 mapping (n = 74), selective internal radiation therapy Y-90 administration (n = 48), diagnostic angiography (n = 34), mesenteric and pelvic embolization (n = 59), stent insertion (n = 8) and miscellaneous (n = 5). Mean sonographic measurement of the left radial artery size at the conventional site at the wrist was 2.55 mm (range 1.4-3.3 mm) and 2.34 mm (range 1.4-3.2 mm) at the anatomical snuffbox (p < 0.001). Technical success rate was 100%, a single small hematoma occurred in the first patient (0.3%). 74.2% of patients had follow-up for radial artery patency (mean 46 days, range 0-66 days), which did not reveal radial artery occlusions or pseudoaneurysm formation.
CONCLUSION: The left distal radial artery in the anatomical snuffbox is smaller in comparison with the conventional access site at the wrist. The difference however is small and does not require intentional downsizing of vascular access equipment to facilitate utilization of ldTRA. Assessment of the vessel size is imperative for appropriate equipment selection and optimizing procedural success. This study supports that ldTRA is technically feasible and safe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical snuffbox; Left distal radial access; ldTRA

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32342166     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02485-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of repeat distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox.

Authors:  James Ronald; Nicholas Durocher; Jonathan G. Martin; Tony P. Smith; Charles Y. Kim; Alan A. Sag
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Jingwei Xiong; Kangli Hui; Miaomiao Xu; Jiejie Zhou; Jie Zhang; Manlin Duan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Analysis of the Risk Factors Related to the Success Rate of Distal Transradial Artery Access in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Jian-Ming Li; Ling-Ling Liu; Wei Liu; Hao Yang; Chun-Guang Feng
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization.

Authors:  Surender Deora; Shubham Kumar Sharma; Rahul Choudhary; Atul Kaushik; Pawan Kumar Garg; Pushpinder Singh Khera; Kuldeep Singh; Sanjay Shah; Tejas M Patel
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2022-06-18

5.  A Comparative Analysis between Ultrasound-Guided and Conventional Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention.

Authors:  Shinsuke Mori; Keisuke Hirano; Masahiro Yamawaki; Norihiro Kobayashi; Yasunari Sakamoto; Masakazu Tsutsumi; Yohsuke Honda; Kenji Makino; Shigemitsu Shirai; Yoshiaki Ito
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.