Elango Kumarasamy1, Irene M Manning1, Leonard B Collins2, Orlando Coronell2, Frank A Leibfarth1. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States. 2. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) contaminate groundwater, surface water, and finished drinking water internationally. Their ecological persistence and adverse human health effects demand effective remediation approaches. Motivated by the limitations in selectivity and performance of current PFAS removal technologies, we report a platform approach for the development of ionic fluorogel resins that effectively remove a chemically diverse mixture of PFAS from water. The synthesis of a material library with systematic variation in fluorous and ionic components led to the identification of a resin that demonstrated rapid removal of PFASs with high affinity and selectivity in the presence of nonfluorous contaminants commonly found in groundwater. The material can be regenerated and reused multiple times. We demonstrate ionic fluorogels as effective adsorbents for the removal of 21 legacy and emerging PFASs from settled water collected at the Sweeney Water Treatment Plant in Wilmington, North Carolina.
Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) contaminate groundwater, surface water, and finished drinking water internationally. Their ecological persistence and adverse human health effects demand effective remediation approaches. Motivated by the limitations in selectivity and performance of current PFAS removal technologies, we report a platform approach for the development of ionic fluorogel resins that effectively remove a chemically diverse mixture of PFAS from water. The synthesis of a material library with systematic variation in fluorous and ionic components led to the identification of a resin that demonstrated rapid removal of PFASs with high affinity and selectivity in the presence of nonfluorous contaminants commonly found in groundwater. The material can be regenerated and reused multiple times. We demonstrate ionic fluorogels as effective adsorbents for the removal of 21 legacy and emerging PFASs from settled water collected at the Sweeney Water Treatment Plant in Wilmington, North Carolina.
PFASs are a class of fluorinated
compounds that are widely used as surfactants in the production of
poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (Teflon), as water/stain repellent coatings
in consumer products, and as components of fire retardants in aqueous
film forming foams[1−4]. PFASs are distributed widely from contamination sites through waterways,[5] and their long-term ecological persistence and
adverse human health effects[6−11] have resulted in increased regulatory attention to the concentration
of PFASs in finished drinking water.[12,13] The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency has set a lifetime health advisory level of 70 ng/L
for the combined concentration of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and
perfluoro-1-octanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in drinking water.[14,15] Consequently, PFOA and PFOS were phased out in the United States
in 2015 and were replaced with short-chain PFASs such as perfluoro-2-propoxypropanoic
acid (GenX).[16,17] While a complete toxicity assessment
for GenX is ongoing, the US Environmental Protection Agency draft
assessment concludes that it is less toxic than PFOA or PFOS,[18] but there is suggestive evidence of carcinogenic
potential for GenX.[19] Currently, the state
of North Carolina has set an upper limit of 140 ng/L for GenX as an
emerging contaminant in drinking water due to widespread contamination
of the Cape Fear River Watershed.[20]A primary challenge for developing a resin for PFAS remediation
is that nonfluorinated organic and inorganic species are present in
natural waters at 3–8 orders of magnitude higher concentration
than PFASs.[21] Current and emerging PFAS
remediation technologies typically remove waterborne contaminants
nonspecifically, resulting in saturation by nonfluorinated species.[22,23] For example, current PFAS remediation efforts using granular activated
carbon (GAC) demonstrate substantial breakthrough at modest treatment
volumes for short-chain PFASs.[24] Furthermore,
the binding affinities of organic contaminants to GAC are often higher
than those of PFASs, which can result in PFASs leaching into filtered
water over time.[24,25] Emerging technologies include
porous organic polymer adsorbents[26−35] and ion exchange materials that contain a fluorinated component.[36−38] While these materials show great promise for adsorbing long-chain
PFASs, they are still at an early stage of development, have generally
not been tested in real water, and/or display modest selectivity for
short-chain PFASs.We identified a materials design platform
to remediate PFASs from
water by combining two complementary strategies—fluorophilic
sorption and targeted ion exchange. Our conceptual approach leverages
the fluorophilicity of PFASs to selectively partition these micropollutants
into a resin, similar to the method commonly used to separate desired
fluorous-tagged products or catalysts from complex reaction mixtures.[39−41] In addition, we reasoned that the incorporation of a tunable density
of charged functional groups would enable ion exchange and sequestration
of charged PFASs. We chose perfluoropolyethers (PFPEs) as the fluorophilic
matrix material for resin development.[42−44] PFPEs are amorphous,
low-molecular-weight perfluorinated oligomers that are synthesized
from the gas phase without the use of perfluorinated surfactants.[45,46] PFPEs can be synthesized using supercritical CO2 as a
solvent,[47] and they are easier to oxidatively
degrade than perfluorocarbons at the termination of their useful lifetime.[48] The ionic fluorogels (IFs) described herein
leverage a synergistic combination of fluorophilicity and ion exchange
to generate high-performing and selective resins for PFAS remediation.
The optimized materials demonstrate removal of a broad range of both
legacy and emerging PFASs at environmentally relevant concentrations
from settled water collected at the Sweeney Water Treatment Plant
in Wilmington, NC.The synthesis of ionic fluorogels was achieved
through thermally
initiated radical copolymerization initiated by azobis(isobutyronitrile)
(AIBN) of a commercially available PFPE with methacrylate chain-end
functionality (Fluorolink MD 700) and an amine-containing monomer
(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, DMAEMA) (Scheme ). The composition of DMAEMA was varied from
10 to 60 wt % with respect to the total weight of the IF to generate
a systematic library of materials that varies the ratio of fluorophilic
and charged components. A portion of each formulation was subsequently
treated with methyl iodide to access materials with quaternary ammonium
groups that act as permanent charged species. Grinding and sieving
the material provided a granular formulation with particle size between
75 and 125 μm for evaluation. This approach rapidly provides
diverse IF formulations from the polymerization of commercially available
components. A separate library of materials was prepared to act as
negative controls in our structure–property studies. First,
a PFPE elastomer with no electrostatic component (no DMAEMA) was polymerized.
Second, nonfluorous ionic gels with charged groups but without a fluorous
component were synthesized through the radical copolymerization of
polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate (PEGMA Mn = 750 g/mol) and DMAEMA. This particular PEGMA was chosen to mimic
a similar degree of polymerization between cross-links as Fluorolink
MD 700. No significant difference was observed for the swelling ratio
of these tightly cross-linked networks, indicating that it will not
have a large influence on resin performance (Figure S16).
Scheme 1
Polymerization and Quaternization of Ionic Fluorogels
Initial PFAS removal efficiency of each IF formulation
was tested
by conducting batch equilibrium adsorption experiments in simulated
natural water, which was formulated by adding 200 mg/L NaCl and 20
mg/L humic acid to deionized water. Three substrates that represent
long-chain (PFOA), short-chain (perfluorohexanoic acid, PFHxA), and
branched (GenX) PFASs were spiked into the matrix each at 50 μg/L.
This selection of PFASs targeted important legacy and emerging contaminants
with various adsorption profiles. After exposing the contaminated
water sample to 100 mg/L of ionic fluorogel for 21 h, PFAS removal
efficiency was analyzed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
(LC-MS). At this high PFAS concentration, PFAS removal by tertiary
and quaternary IF was efficient, demonstrating >80% removal of
PFASs
in most cases (Figure S1). The exceptional
adsorption of PFASs at these high concentrations led us to probe PFAS
removal in a more challenging environmentally relevant scenario (1.0
μg/L of each PFAS, 10 mg/L ionic fluorogel, 21 h). The results
of this systematic study revealed valuable structure–property
information (illustrative results in Figure , complete results in Figure S2). Ionic fluorogels containing tertiary amines (IF-, X = wt % amine comonomer
incorporation) demonstrated lower affinity for PFASs than the respective
materials that contained quaternary ammonium groups (IF-, X+ = wt % ammonium comonomer
incorporation) across all formulations tested (Figure A), proving the importance of incorporating
permanent charge. The highest performing formulations contained between
20 and 40 wt % ammonium comonomer incorporation (IF-20+ through IF-40+), demonstrating >80% removal of short-chain
PFASs (PFHxA and GenX). We hypothesize that these formulations have
enough ammonium content to enable efficient surface wetting while
still containing enough fluorous content to provide selective PFAS
adsorption.
Figure 1
(A) Equilibrium PFAS removal by ionic fluorogels with amine (IF-) or ammonium (IF-) groups where X = 0, 20, 30, or 40 wt %.
(B) Equilibrium PFAS removal by GAC, powdered activated carbon (PAC),
ion exchange resin (IX), and PEGMA gels with 20 or 30 wt % ammonium
comonomer. Water constituents, 200 mg/L NaCl and 20 mg/L humic acid;
pH = 6.4; [sorbent] = 10 mg/L; [PFAS]0 = 1 μg L–1 each; equilibrium time, 21 h. Error bars: standard
deviation of 3 experiments.
(A) Equilibrium PFAS removal by ionic fluorogels with amine (IF-) or ammonium (IF-) groups where X = 0, 20, 30, or 40 wt %.
(B) Equilibrium PFAS removal by GAC, powdered activated carbon (PAC),
ion exchange resin (IX), and PEGMA gels with 20 or 30 wt % ammonium
comonomer. Water constituents, 200 mg/L NaCl and 20 mg/L humic acid;
pH = 6.4; [sorbent] = 10 mg/L; [PFAS]0 = 1 μg L–1 each; equilibrium time, 21 h. Error bars: standard
deviation of 3 experiments.Comparing ionic fluorogels against materials made to serve as controls
illustrated the synergistic roles of fluorous interactions and ion
exchange behavior. Removing ionic groups and exposing IF-0 (Figure A), an ionic
fluorogel made solely of Fluorolink, to the equilibrium adsorption
experiment led to no removal of PFHxA or GenX and modest PFOA removal.
Furthermore, PEGMA gels made with a nonfluorous hydrocarbon equivalent
of PFPEs demonstrated poor results for all formulations tested (<10%
removal for all PFASs, Figure B).Commercial materials representing the current state-of-the-art
for PFAS removal were subsequently tested under these equilibrium
adsorption conditions.[49] Samples of GAC
(Filtrasorb 400, Calgon Carbon), powdered activated carbon (PAC, PicaHydro
MP23, Lenntech), and an anion exchange resin (IX, PFA 694E, Purolite)
were exposed to simulated natural water for 21 h at a resin loading
of 10 mg/L.[12,21,50] Under these challenging conditions, the limitations of current technology
are evident, especially for the adsorption of short-chain PFASs (Figure B). These head-to-head
comparisons demonstrate the selectivity of ionic fluorogels for PFASs
compared to conventional technologies, especially in a complex matrix
that contains a 20 000 times higher concentration of organic
contaminants (humic acid) compared to each PFAS.GenX was chosen
as an emerging short-chain contaminant to understand
the kinetics of adsorption and capacity of ionic fluorogels. IF-20+ and IF-30+ were chosen as high-performing
materials for further study. The adsorption kinetics of GenX at high
concentration (200 μg/L) by IF-20+ (100 mg/L) were
analyzed in deionized water (Figure ). Rapid and quantitative removal of GenX was observed
within 30 s. At 72 h, no desorption was observed, suggesting that
the adsorption into the ionic fluorogel is irreversible under these
conditions. Similarly, the adsorption kinetics at an environmentally
relevant concentration of GenX (1 μg/L) by IF-20+ (10 mg/L) were also rapid, demonstrating 94% removal within 30 min
and no desorption over time (Figure ). This removal efficiency for GenX results in a final
concentration (60 ng/L) is under the limit set by the state of North
Carolina (140 ng/L).
Figure 2
Time dependent GenX sorption by IF-20+ at
high (red,
dashed; GenX = 200 μg/L; sorbent = 100 mg/L) and low (blue,
solid; GenX = 1 μg/L; sorbent = 10 mg/L) concentration. pH =
9.7. Error bars: standard deviation of 3 experiments.
Time dependent GenX sorption by IF-20+ at
high (red,
dashed; GenX = 200 μg/L; sorbent = 100 mg/L) and low (blue,
solid; GenX = 1 μg/L; sorbent = 10 mg/L) concentration. pH =
9.7. Error bars: standard deviation of 3 experiments.A GenX binding isotherm was constructed to understand the
binding
capacity of IF-20+.[51] The
concentration of IF-20+ was fixed at 100 mg/L while the
GenX concentration was varied from 0.20 to 50 mg/L. Data from triplicate
experiments (Figure A) was fitted to the Langmuir adsorption model to yield an affinity
coefficient (KL) of 5.9 × 106 M–1 and an estimated GenX capacity (Qm) of 278 mg/g. These represent the highest
reported values in the literature for GenX at an environmentally relevant
pH.[31] The isotherm was also fitted to the
Freundlich model, and Freundlich’s constant (KF) and the intensity of adsorption (n) were found to be 141 (mg/g)(L/mg)1/ and 2.2, respectively.[31]
Figure 3
(A) GenX adsorption isotherm
by IF-20+ (Adsorbent
= 100 mg/L; GenX = 0.2–50 mg/L). Lines show fit to Langmuir
(red, dashed) and Freundlich (blue, solid) models. (B) Regeneration
and reuse of IF-20+. Sorbent = 20 mg, [GenX] = 10 mg/L
(20 mL); extraction with 400 mM methanolic ammonium acetate (20 mL).
Inset: sorbent = 5 mg, [GenX] = 200 mg/L (5 mL); extraction with 400
mM methanolic ammonium acetate (5 mL). Error bars: standard deviation
of 3 experiments.
(A) GenX adsorption isotherm
by IF-20+ (Adsorbent
= 100 mg/L; GenX = 0.2–50 mg/L). Lines show fit to Langmuir
(red, dashed) and Freundlich (blue, solid) models. (B) Regeneration
and reuse of IF-20+. Sorbent = 20 mg, [GenX] = 10 mg/L
(20 mL); extraction with 400 mM methanolic ammonium acetate (20 mL).
Inset: sorbent = 5 mg, [GenX] = 200 mg/L (5 mL); extraction with 400
mM methanolic ammonium acetate (5 mL). Error bars: standard deviation
of 3 experiments.Subsequently, IF-20+ was tested for its ability to
be regenerated for multiple reuse cycles (Figure B). Adsorption experiments were performed
by loading IF-20+ (20 mg) onto a PTFE syringe filter
(0.45 μm, 25 mm diameter). A GenX solution (10 mg/L, 20 mL)
was passed through the filter over 2 min, and the residual GenX concentration
in the filtrate was analyzed by LC-MS. The results showed >90%
removal
of GenX from the solution in such flow-through conditions, thus demonstrating
the efficiency of adsorption even under short residence time conditions.
Complete extraction of adsorbed GenX by IF-20+ was achieved
by washing the material with a 400 mM methanolic ammonium acetate
solution (20 mL, 2 min). This process was repeated 5 times without
loss of efficiency in adsorption or reuse. Complementary to these
rapid and low capacity regeneration investigations, we subjected IF-20+ (5 mg) to an analogous experiment under saturation
conditions ([GenX] = 200 mg/L, 5 mL) similar to the scenario encountered
during long-term water treatment. Exposure of IF-20+ nearly
saturated with GenX to a 400 mM methanolic ammonium acetate solution
led to efficient regeneration and was competent for an additional
reuse, which represents an attractive attribute of these materials
(Figure B, inset).The ionic fluorogels provided rapid, efficient, and high capacity
removal of a variety of PFASs under laboratory conditions. Real water
matrices, however, contain an unpredictable cocktail of organic and
inorganic contaminants that are difficult to model in a laboratory
setting. To validate ionic fluorogels as a promising technology for
PFAS removal from water, we obtained settled water collected at a
site previously affected by PFAS contamination, the Sweeney Water
Treatment Plant in Wilmington, NC.[12] The
water contained a total organic content (TOC) of 1.3 mg/L and had
a pH of 6.2. In addition to PFASs found in the water upon collection
(at levels of 20–50 ng/L), we spiked the matrix with 21 emerging
and legacy PFASs. The real water matrix was exposed to IF-20+ and IF-30+ (100 mg/L), and PFAS removal was analyzed
at 30 min and 2 h, with the data presented being the average of two
experiments. After 2 h, short-chain PFASs that are traditionally challenging
to adsorb, including PFHxA, GenX, and perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS)
are removed from the water at >95% efficiency (representative data
shown in Figure ,
complete analysis in Figure S11). We did
not see evidence of long-chain PFASs such as PFOA and PFOS in the
solution down to the detection limit of the LC-MS. Notably, IF-30+ removed all three perfluorinated sulfonic acids (PFBS,
PFHxS, PFOS) at >95% efficiency, demonstrating the selectivity
of
the ionic fluorogel for PFASs beyond carboxylic acids. Lastly, IF-30+ performed impressively for removing the short-chain
perfluorinated carboxylic acidsPFBA (60%) and PFPeA (87%), which
contain only 3 and 4 perfluorocarbons, respectively (Figure )[30,31,34] and have demonstrated decreased sorption
relative to the sulfonic acid analogues.[52]
Figure 4
Removal
of PFASs after 2 h by IF-30+ from settled
water collected at the Sweeney Water Treatment Plant in Wilmington,
NC. TOC = 1.3 mg/L; pH = 6.2; [sorbent] = 100 mg/L; [PFAS]0 = 1 μg/L each. Ten representative PFASs shown, complete analysis
shown in Figure S11.
Removal
of PFASs after 2 h by IF-30+ from settled
water collected at the Sweeney Water Treatment Plant in Wilmington,
NC. TOC = 1.3 mg/L; pH = 6.2; [sorbent] = 100 mg/L; [PFAS]0 = 1 μg/L each. Ten representative PFASs shown, complete analysis
shown in Figure S11.In conclusion, we introduce ionic fluorogels as a platform polymeric
adsorbent to remove PFASs from water at environmentally relevant concentrations.
The synergistic combination of fluorous and electrostatic interactions
results in the high affinity, high capacity, and rapid sorption of
a variety of PFASs from real water collected at an affected site in
the Cape Fear River Watershed of North Carolina. The systematic material
library and relationships identified between fluoropolymer and ionic
content suggest general structure–property criteria to design
improved sorbents for PFASs.
Authors: Yuhan Ling; Max J Klemes; Leilei Xiao; Alaaeddin Alsbaiee; William R Dichtel; Damian E Helbling Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Mohamed Ateia; Md Arifuzzaman; Steven Pellizzeri; Mohamed F Attia; Nishanth Tharayil; Jeffrey N Anker; Tanju Karanfil Journal: Water Res Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 11.236
Authors: David Melzer; Neil Rice; Michael H Depledge; William E Henley; Tamara S Galloway Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Santiago Correa; Abigail K Grosskopf; Hector Lopez Hernandez; Doreen Chan; Anthony C Yu; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Eric A Appel Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Gabriel Partl; Marcus Rauter; Lukas Fliri; Thomas Gelbrich; Christoph Kreutz; Thomas Müller; Volker Kahlenberg; Sven Nerdinger; Herwig Schottenberger Journal: Molecules Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 4.927