| Literature DB >> 32341963 |
Galina V Portnova1,2, Michael S Atanov1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the EEG changes induced by emotional non-verbal sounds using nonlinear signals' features and also to examine the subjective emotional response in patients with different neurological and psychiatric disorders.Entities:
Keywords: EEG; EEG envelope; Hjorth; coma; fractal dimension; schizophrenia; stroke; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2018 PMID: 32341963 PMCID: PMC7179336 DOI: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2018.4.221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIMS Neurosci ISSN: 2373-8006
Descriptive statistics of subjects.
| Groups | Number of subjects | Age | Sex (f/m) | Glasgow Coma Scale | Duration of the disease |
| Control group | 37 | 31.6 ± 7.1 | 22/25 | - | - |
| Patients with schizophrenia | 26 | 25.9 ± 4.7 | 11/15 | - | 3 ± 0.6 years |
| Moderate TBI patients | 31 | 31.2 ± 6.6 | 15/16 | 13.0 ± 1.9 | 10.5 ± 7.7 months |
| Patients after stroke | 28 | 55.2 ± 5.1 | 13/15 | - | 7.9 ± 1.3 months |
| Patients in coma | 19 | 27.1 ± 5.3 | 8/11 | 4.3 ± 1.7 | 5.9 ± 2.9 days |
Note: Mean ± std.dev. where applicable.
Figure 1.PSD values 2–20 Hz averaged over electrodes C3, Cz, C4: x—frequency in Hz, y—PSD in µV2/Hz.
Figure 2.Significant (|r| > 0.35, p < 0.05) correlations between PSD and nonlinear EEG features.
Significant differences of the features between stimuli presentation and rest (“+”—higher in rest, “−”—lower in rest).
| Bird song | Barking | Crying | |||||||||||||
| FD | EMF | EMFA | RAD | Hjorth | FD | EMF | EMFA | RAD | Hjorth | FD | EMF | EMFA | RAD | Hjorth | |
| Control group | − | + | |||||||||||||
| Schizophrenia | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | |||||
| Moderate TBI | − | − | + | − | |||||||||||
| Stroke | − | − | − | ||||||||||||
| Coma | − | − | − | + | − | − | |||||||||
| Coughing and Vomiting | Scratching | Laughter | |||||||||||||
| Control group | + | − | − | − | − | ||||||||||
| Schizophrenia | + | + | + | + | − | ||||||||||
| Moderate TBI | − | − | − | − | + | − | |||||||||
| Stroke | + | ||||||||||||||
| Coma | + | − | − | + | |||||||||||
Figure 3.Emotional assessment of stimuli. A—arousal (0 10), B—empathy (0 10), C—irritation (0 10).