Literature DB >> 32341935

Development and validation of the Lesion Synthesis Toolbox and the Perception Study Tool for quantifying observer limits of detection of lesions in positron emission tomography.

Hanif Gabrani-Juma1,2, Zamzam Al Bimani1, Lionel S Zuckier1, Ran Klein1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate detection of cancer lesions in positron emission tomography (PET) is fundamental to achieving favorable clinical outcomes. Therefore, image reconstruction, processing, visualization, and interpretation techniques must be optimized for this task. The objective of this work was to (1) develop and validate an efficient method to generate well-characterized synthetic lesions in real patient data and (2) to apply these lesions in a human perception experiment to establish baseline measurements of the limits of lesion detection as a function of lesion size and contrast using current imaging technologies. Approach: A fully integrated software package for synthesizing well-characterized lesions in real patient PET was developed using a vendor provided PET image reconstruction toolbox (REGRECON5, General Electric Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin). Lesion characteristics were validated experimentally for geometric accuracy, activity accuracy, and absence of artifacts. The Lesion Synthesis Toolbox was used to generate a library of 133 synthetic lesions of varying sizes ( n = 7 ) and contrast levels ( n = 19 ) in manually defined locations in the livers of 37 patient studies. A lesion-localization perception study was performed with seven observers to determine the limits of detection with regard to lesion size and contrast using our web-based perception study tool.
Results: The Lesion Synthesis Toolbox was validated for accurate lesion placement and size. Lesion intensities were deemed accurate with slightly elevated activities (5% at 2:1 lesion-to-background contrast) in small lesions ( Ø = 15    mm spheres), and no bias in large lesions ( Ø = 22.5    mm ). Bed-stitching artifacts were not observed, and lesion attenuation correction bias was small ( - 1.6 ± 1.2 % ). The 133 liver lesions were synthesized in ∼ 50    h , and readers were able to complete the perception study of these lesions in 12 ± 3    min with consistent limits of detection amongst all readers. Conclusions: Our open-source utilities can be employed by nonexperts to generate well-characterized synthetic lesions in real patient PET images and for administering perception studies on clinical workstations without the need to install proprietary software.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  and positron emission tomography; lesion synthesis; limits of detection; perception

Year:  2020        PMID: 32341935      PMCID: PMC7173347          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  27 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Paul E Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Monte Carlo simulations in SPET and PET.

Authors:  I Buvat; I Castiglioni
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-03

3.  The image quality of FBP and MLEM reconstruction.

Authors:  Herfried Wieczorek
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A new software tool for removing, storing, and adding abnormalities to medical images for perception research studies.

Authors:  Mark T Madsen; Kevin S Berbaum; Andrew N Ellingson; Brad H Thompson; Brian F Mullan; Robert T Caldwell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Performance of MAP reconstruction for hot lesion detection in whole-body PET/CT: an evaluation with human and numerical observers.

Authors:  Johan Nuyts; Christian Michel; Lieselot Brepoels; Liesbet De Ceuninck; Christophe Deroose; Karolien Goffin; Felix M Mottaghy; Sigrid Stroobants; Jelle Van Riet; Raf Verscuren
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Evaluation of lesion detectability in positron emission tomography when using a convergent penalized likelihood image reconstruction method.

Authors:  Kristen A Wangerin; Sangtae Ahn; Scott Wollenweber; Steven G Ross; Paul E Kinahan; Ravindra M Manjeshwar
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-22

8.  Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Judit Lantos; Erik S Mittra; Craig S Levin; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-25

9.  Comparison of Lesion Detection and Quantification in MAP Reconstruction with Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Priors.

Authors:  Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2006-06-29

10.  Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative.

Authors:  O L Munk; L P Tolbod; S B Hansen; T V Bogsrud
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-01-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of attenuation correction in PET/MRI with synthetic lesion insertion.

Authors:  Mahdjoub Hamdi; Yutaka Natsuaki; Kristen A Wangerin; Hongyu An; Sarah St James; Paul E Kinahan; John J Sunderland; Peder E Z Larson; Thomas A Hope; Richard Laforest
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-09-20

2.  Evaluation of a method based on synthetic data inserted into raw data prior to reconstruction for the assessment of PET scanners.

Authors:  Quentin Maronnier; Frédéric Courbon; Olivier Caselles
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.