| Literature DB >> 32341718 |
Abstract
In the present study, I propose a novel fitting method to describe the outbreak of 2019-nCoV in China. The fitted data were selected carefully from the non-Hubei part and Hubei Province of China respectively. For the non-Hubei part, the time period of data collection corresponds from the beginning of the policy of isolation to present day. But for Hubei Province, the subjects of Wuhan City and Hubei Province were included from the time of admission to the Huoshenshan Hospital to present day in order to ensure that all or the majority of the confirmed and suspected patients were collected for diagnosis and treatment. The employed basic functions for fitting are the hyperbolic tangent functions tanh ( . ) since in these cases the 2019-nCoV is just an epidemic. Subsequently, the 2019-nCoV will initially expand rapidly and tend to disappear. Therefore, the numbers of the accumulative confirmed patients in different cities, provinces and geographical regions will initially increase rapidly and subsequently stabilize to a plateau phase. The selection of the basic functions for fitting is crucial. In the present study, I found that the hyperbolic tangent functions tanh ( . ) could satisfy the aforementioned properties. By this novel method, I can obtain two significant results. They base on the conditions that the rigorous isolation policy is executed continually. Initially, I can predict the numbers very accurately of the cumulative confirmed patients in different cities, provinces and parts in China, notably, in Wuhan City with the smallest relative error estimated to 0.021 % , in Hubei Province with the smallest relative error estimated to 0.012 % and in the non-Hubei part of China with the smallest relative error of - 0.195% in the short-term period of infection. In addition, perhaps I can predict the times when the plateau phases will occur respectively in different regions in the long-term period of infection. Generally for the non-Hubei part of China, the plateau phase of the outbreak of the 2019-nCoV will be expected this March or at the end of this February. In the non-Hubei region of China it is expected that the epidemic will cease on the 30th of March 2020 and following this date no new confirmed patient will be expected. The predictions of the time of Inflection Points and maximum NACP for some important regions may be also obtained. A specific plan for the prevention measures of the 2019-nCoV outbreak must be implemented. This will involve the present returning to work and resuming production in China. Based on the presented results, I suggest that the rigorous isolation policy by the government should be executed regularly during daily life and work duties. Moreover, as many as possible the confirmed and suspected cases should be collected to diagnose or treat.Entities:
Keywords: 2019-nCoV; Inflection points (IPs); Numbers of the accumulative confirmed patients (NACP); Plateau phase; Prediction
Year: 2020 PMID: 32341718 PMCID: PMC7184814 DOI: 10.1007/s11571-020-09588-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Neurodyn ISSN: 1871-4080 Impact factor: 5.082
NACP in the serious outbreak Non-Hubei cities and provinces. I
| Regions | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 1.28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hubei | N | N | N | N | N | 923 | 1321 | 1801 | 2420 |
| Beijing | N | 10 | 14 | 26 | 36 | 54 | 68 | 91 | 102 |
| Shanghai | 1 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 33 | 40 | 53 | 66 | 80 |
| Zhengzhou | N | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 20 | 29 | 37 | 40 |
| Xinyang | N | N | N | 1 | 5 | 22 | 23 | 29 | 32 |
| Nanyang | N | N | N | N | 8 | 15 | 19 | 26 | 31 |
| Zhoukou | N | N | N | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 15 | 19 |
| Gansu | N | N | N | 2 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 19 | 24 |
| Lanzhou | N | N | N | N | 1 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 14 |
NACP in the serious outbreak Non-Hubei cities and provinces. II
| Regions | 1.29 | 1.30 | 1.31 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hubei | 3125 | 3886 | 4638 | 5306 | 6028 | 6916 | 7646 | 8353 | 9049 | 9593 |
| Beijing | 114 | 132 | 156 | 183 | 212 | 228 | 253 | 274 | 297 | 315 |
| Shanghai | 101 | 128 | 153 | 177 | 193 | 208 | 233 | 254 | 269 | 281 |
| Zhengzhou | 46 | 50 | 56 | 65 | 72 | 85 | 92 | 102 | 112 | 120 |
| Xinyang | 42 | 49 | 70 | 88 | 99 | 112 | 138 | 164 | 176 | 192 |
| Nanyang | 51 | 61 | 66 | 76 | 84 | 99 | 107 | 111 | 118 | 128 |
| Zhoukou | 25 | 36 | 38 | 40 | 47 | 52 | 56 | 59 | 60 | 62 |
| Gansu | 26 | 29 | 35 | 40 | 51 | 55 | 57 | 62 | 67 | 71 |
| Lanzhou | 14 | 15 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 26 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 32 |
NACP in Wuhan City and Hubei Province
| Regions | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubei | 22,112 | 24,953 | 27,100 | 29,631 |
| Wuhan | 11,618 | 13,603 | 14,982 | 16,902 |
Fig. 6The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Nanyang, Henan Province
Fig. 3The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Shanghai
Fig. 8The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Non-Huibei regions
Fig. 2The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Beijing
Fig. 4The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Zhengzhou, Henan Province
Fig. 5The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Xinyang, Henan Province
Fig. 7The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Zhoukou, Henan Province
Fig. 9The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Wuhan, Hubei Province
Fig. 10The fitting (a) and the evolution curve (b) of NACP for Hubei Province
Prediction of NACP in different regions for a continuous time period. I
| Regions | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hubei | 10,163/10,098, 0.64% | 10,583/10,542, 0.38% | 10,950/10,922, 0.26% |
| Beijing | 328/326, 0.61% | 340/337, 0.89% | 350/342, 2.34% |
| Shanghai | 290/292, | 300/295, 1.7% | 306/302, 1.33% |
| Zhengzhou | 127/126, 0.79% | 132/130, 1.54% | 137/132, 3.79% |
| Xinyang | 208/205, 1.46% | 219/220, | 231/228, 1.32% |
| Nanyang | 130/133, | 135/134, 0.75% | 138/136, 1.47% |
| Zhoukou | 64/62, 3.23% | 65/65, 0 | 66/65, 1.54% |
| Gansu | 74/79, | 79/83, | 84/86, |
| Lanzhou | 30/33, | 32/33, | 33/35, |
| Hubei | N | N | 32,136/31,728, 1.29% |
| Wuhan | N | N | 18,838/18,454, 2.08% |
Prediction of NACP in different regions for a continuous time period. II
| Regions | 2.11 | 2.12 | 2.13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hubei | 11,265/11,287, | 11,554/11,598, | 11,808/11,865, |
| Beijing | 356/352, 1.14% | 362/366, | 370/372, |
| Shanghai | 311/306, 1.63% | 315/313, 0.64% | 319/318, 0.32% |
| Zhengzhou | 139/137, 1.46% | 142/141, 0.71% | 144/142, 1.41% |
| Xinyang | 239/231, 3.46% | 243/240, 1.25% | 249/243, 2.47% |
| Nanyang | 138/138, 0 | 142/145, | 145/146, |
| Zhoukou | 67/66, 1.52% | 67/68, | 68/69, |
| Gansu | 87/86, 1.16% | 89/87, 2.3% | 90/90, 0 |
| Lanzhou | 34/35, | 35/35, 0 | 36/35, 2.86% |
| Hubei | 33,208/33,366, | 34,476/34,874, | 35,754/36,602, |
| Wuhan | 19,513/19,558, | 20,318/20,630, | 21,425/21,960, |
Fig. 1Fitting and prediction of SARS in China Mainland and Hongkong in 2003 respectively in a and b
Fig. 11Inflection points in different regions I. The intersection points of the evolution curves with the horizontal axis are the times of the Inflection Points and the level parts mean the maximums of NACP for different regions respectively
Fig. 12Inflection points in different regions II. The intersection points of the evolution curves with the horizontal axis are the times of the Inflection Points and the level parts mean the maximums of NACP for different regions respectively
Fig. 13Inflection points in different regions III. The intersection points of the evolution curves with the horizontal axis are the times of the Inflection Points and the level parts mean the maximums of NACP for different regions respectively
Prediction of IP in different Chinese regions. I
| Items | Non-Hubei | Beijing | Shanghai | Zhejiang | Hangzhou | Wuhan | Hubei |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Day of Data | 25 Jan. | 21 Jan. | 20 Jan. | 24 Jan. | 24 Jan. | 12 Feb. | 12 Feb. |
| Day of IP | 30 Mar. | 21 Mar. | 8 Mar. | 8 Mar. | 26 Feb. | 10 Apr. | 12 Apr. |
| Max. of NACP | 12,955 | 400 | 340 | 1232 | 182 | 51,015 | 68,438 |
Prediction of IP in different Chinese regions. II
| Items | Wenzhou | Jiangsu | Nanjing | Hunan | Changsha | Sichuan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Day of Data | 24 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 21 Jan. |
| Day of IP | 7 Mar. | 9 Mar. | 28 Feb. | 8 Mar. | 3 Mar. | 15 Mar. |
| Max. of NACP | 527 | 672 | 100 | 1063 | 252 | 562 |
Prediction of IP in different Chinese regions. III
| Items | Chongqing | Guangdong | Shenzhen | Anhui | Jiangxi | Hebei |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Day of Data | 22 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 21 Jan. | 22 Jan. | 22 Jan. |
| Day of IP | 13 Mar. | 12 Mar. | 5 Mar. | 22 Mar. | 12 Mar. | 10 Mar. |
| Max. of NACP | 590 | 1367 | 425 | 1167 | 1017 | 334 |
Prediction of IP in different Chinese regions. IV
| Items | Henan | Zhengzhou | Xinyang | Zhoukou | Nanyang | Gansu | Lanzhou |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Day of Data | 22 Jan. | 21 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 24 Jan. | 23 Jan. | 24 Jan. |
| Day of IP | 16 Mar. | 1 Mar. | 5 Mar. | 25 Feb. | 6 Mar. | 2 Mar. | 23 Feb. |
| Max. of NACP | 1295 | 157 | 274 | 72 | 156 | 97 | 37 |
Prediction of NACP in different regions in recent time period. I
| Regions | 2.24 | 2.25 | 2.26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hubei | 12,961/12,872, 0.691% | 12,977/12,877, 0.777% | 12,988/12,901, 0.674% |
| Hubei | 65,129/64,786, 0.529% | 65,231/65,187, 0.0675% | 65,507/65,596, |
| Wuhan | 47,011/47,071, | 47,535/47,441, 0.198% | 47,927/47,824, 0.215% |
Prediction of NACP in different regions in recent time period. II
| Regions | 2.27 | 2.28 | 2.29 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hubei | 12,996/12,910, 0.666% | 13,003/12,914, 0.689% | 13,008/12,917, 0.705% |
| Hubei | 65,850/65,914, | 66,152/66,337, | 66,496/66,907, |
| Wuhan | 48,280/48,137, 0.297% | 48,567/48,557, 0.021% | 48,889/49,122, |
Prediction of NACP in different regions in recent time period. III
| Regions | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hubei | 13,010/12,923, 0.673% | 13,012/12,934, 0.603% | 13,012/12,938,0.572% |
| Hubei | 66,925/67,103, | 67,225/67,217, 0.012% | 67,421/67,332, 0.132% |
| Wuhan | 49,296/49,315, | 49,574/49,426, 0.299% | 49,752/49,540, 0.428% |