Literature DB >> 32341605

Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.

Wenchao Ma1.   

Abstract

Limited-information fit measures appear to be promising in assessing the goodness-of-fit of dichotomous response cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), but their performance has not been examined for polytomous response CDMs. This study investigates the performance of the M ord statistic and standardized root mean square residual (SRMSR) for an ordinal response CDM-the sequential generalized deterministic inputs, noisy "and" gate model. Simulation studies showed that the M ord statistic had well-calibrated Type I error rates, but the correct detection rates were influenced by various factors such as item quality, sample size, and the number of response categories. In addition, the SRMSR was also influenced by many factors and the common practice of comparing the SRMSR against a prespecified cut-off (e.g., .05) may not be appropriate. A set of real data was analyzed as well to illustrate the use of M ord statistic and SRMSR in practice.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords:  cognitive diagnosis; goodness-of-fit; limited information; model-data fit; ordinal response; sequential G-DINA

Year:  2019        PMID: 32341605      PMCID: PMC7174807          DOI: 10.1177/0146621619843829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  16 in total

1.  Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.

Authors:  Li Cai; Mark Hansen
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Assessing Approximate Fit in Categorical Data Analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Harry Joe
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.

Authors:  Jonathan L Templin; Robert A Henson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

4.  Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.

Authors:  Mark Reiser
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Charles Iaconangelo; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-01-18

6.  A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.

Authors:  Jimmy de la Torre; Chia-Yi Chiu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Zhan Shu; Zhuoran Shang; Gongjun Xu
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-05-05

9.  Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.

Authors:  Mark Hansen; Li Cai; Scott Monroe; Zhen Li
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  A sequential cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous responses.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.