Chang Ju Hwang1, Dong Gyun Kim2, Choon Sung Lee1, Dong-Ho Lee1, Jae Hwan Cho1, Jae-Woo Park3, Jong Min Baik4, Kwan Bum Lee1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scoliosis Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Spine Center, Haeundae Bumin Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangneung Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gil medical Center, University of Gachon College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case control study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the appropriate traction period and preoperative halo traction (HT)-related factors in severe scoliosis SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: HT can reduce risks involved in severe scoliosis treatment, and its safety and efficacy are well known. However, a lack of evidence exists in guiding the appropriate traction period and other factors involved in HT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients who underwent preoperative HT, analyzed correction rate changes over time using HT, and assessed other factors by dividing the patients into two groups according to differences between the post-bending correction angle (PBC) and post-halo traction correction angle (PTC): group A (PBC ≒ PTC) and group B (PBC < PTC). The grouping was determined by whether the difference between PBC and PTC was >8°, the maximum measurement error when measuring the Cobb angle. RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle improved from 96.9° preoperatively to 72.9° post-bending to 63.3° post-traction and 32.5° postoperatively. The coronal correction of the major curve (change in curve from the start to each week/total change in curve after traction) was 28.2% at 1 week (n = 59), 34.0% at 2 weeks (n = 58), 33.8% at 3 weeks (n = 41), and 32.2% at 4 weeks (n = 13); a difference was noted between the first and second weeks (P < 0.001, <0.001, 0.244, and 0.082, respectively). Compared with group A, group B had a lower height (154.9 vs. 144.4 cm, P = 0.029), lower body weight (49.1 vs. 39.4 kg, P = 0.017), higher traction/body weight ratio (0.41 vs. 0.47, P = 0.025), and more halo-femoral traction (0 vs. 6, P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Traction for ≥3 weeks was unnecessary for optimal traction. In patients with low height and weight, halo-femoral traction with a heavy traction weight was effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case control study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the appropriate traction period and preoperative halo traction (HT)-related factors in severe scoliosis SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: HT can reduce risks involved in severe scoliosis treatment, and its safety and efficacy are well known. However, a lack of evidence exists in guiding the appropriate traction period and other factors involved in HT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients who underwent preoperative HT, analyzed correction rate changes over time using HT, and assessed other factors by dividing the patients into two groups according to differences between the post-bending correction angle (PBC) and post-halo traction correction angle (PTC): group A (PBC ≒ PTC) and group B (PBC < PTC). The grouping was determined by whether the difference between PBC and PTC was >8°, the maximum measurement error when measuring the Cobb angle. RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle improved from 96.9° preoperatively to 72.9° post-bending to 63.3° post-traction and 32.5° postoperatively. The coronal correction of the major curve (change in curve from the start to each week/total change in curve after traction) was 28.2% at 1 week (n = 59), 34.0% at 2 weeks (n = 58), 33.8% at 3 weeks (n = 41), and 32.2% at 4 weeks (n = 13); a difference was noted between the first and second weeks (P < 0.001, <0.001, 0.244, and 0.082, respectively). Compared with group A, group B had a lower height (154.9 vs. 144.4 cm, P = 0.029), lower body weight (49.1 vs. 39.4 kg, P = 0.017), higher traction/body weight ratio (0.41 vs. 0.47, P = 0.025), and more halo-femoral traction (0 vs. 6, P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Traction for ≥3 weeks was unnecessary for optimal traction. In patients with low height and weight, halo-femoral traction with a heavy traction weight was effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Authors: Quan Li; Zhi Zhao; Jingming Xie; Ying Zhang; Tao Li; Yingsong Wang Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 2.629