Literature DB >> 32341210

Sperm retrieval rates and clinical outcomes for patients with different causes of azoospermia who undergo microdissection testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Hong-Liang Zhang1,2,3,4, Lian-Ming Zhao1,2,3, Jia-Ming Mao1,2,3, De-Feng Liu1,2,3, Wen-Hao Tang1,2,3,4, Hao-Cheng Lin1,2,3, Li Zhang2, Ying Lian2, Kai Hong1,2,3, Hui Jiang1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare the sperm retrieval rates (SRRs) and clinical outcomes of patients with different causes of azoospermia who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (micro-TESE-ICSI). We conducted a retrospective study at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Peking University Third Hospital in Beijing, China, from January 2014 to December 2017. This study examined 769 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent 347 cycles of micro-TESE-ICSI. Patients with azoospermia were classified into Group A (Klinefelter syndrome, n = 284, 125 cycles), Group B (azoospermia Y chromosome factor c [AZFc] microdeletion, n = 91, 64 cycles), Group C (cryptorchidism, n = 52, 39 cycles), Group D (previous mumps and bilateral orchitis, n = 23, 23 cycles), and Group E (idiopathic azoospermia, n = 319, 96 cycles). Clinical characteristics, SRR, embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes of the patients were compared between all groups. Patients in Group D had the highest and most successful SRR. The average SRR for all patients was 46.0%. The rates of clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live birth in Group D were 78.3%, 65.0%, and 74.0%, respectively, which were higher than those in all other groups (P < 0.05). Group B patients had the lowest clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live birth rates of all groups (P < 0.05). No differences were found in the miscarriage rate or birth defects among the groups (P > 0.05). Patients with orchitis had the highest SRR and best clinical outcomes. Although AZFc microdeletion patients had a higher SRR, their clinical outcomes were worse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  azoospermia; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; microdissection testicular sperm extraction; pregnancy outcomes; sperm retrieval rate

Year:  2020        PMID: 32341210     DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_12_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  3 in total

Review 1.  Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?

Authors:  Ettore Caroppo; Giovanni Maria Colpi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Therapeutic Effects of Edaravone on Azoospermia: Free Radical Scavenging and Autophagy Modulation in Testicular Tissue of Mice.

Authors:  Mahsa Ghaffari Novin; Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani; Mohammadreza Mafi Balani; Abbas Aliaghaei; Azar Afshar; Fakhroddin Aghajanpour; Reza Soltani; Hamid Nazarian; Maryam Salimi; Ahad Hasan Seyed Hasani; Shabnam Abdi; Mohammad-Amin Abdollahifar; Pourya Raee
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  Use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in testicular diseases: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Marta Tenuta; Franz Sesti; Ilaria Bonaventura; Paola Mazzotta; Riccardo Pofi; Daniele Gianfrilli; Carlotta Pozza
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.842

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.