| Literature DB >> 32340116 |
Woong Gi Lee1, Younghyun Cho2, Sang Wook Kang1,3.
Abstract
To prepare a porous cellulose acetate (CA) for application as a battery separator, Cd(NO3)2·4H2O was utilized with water-pressure as an external physical force. When the CA was complexed with Cd(NO3)2·4H2O and exposed to external water-pressure, the water-flux through the CA was observed, indicating the generation of pores in the polymer. Furthermore, as the hydraulic pressure increased, the water-flux increased proportionally, indicating the possibility of control for the porosity and pore size. Surprisingly, the value above 250 LMH (L/m2h) observed at the ratio of 1:0.35 (mole ratio of CA: Cd(NO3)2·4H2O) was of higher flux than those of CA/other metal nitrate salts (Ni(NO3)2 and Mg(NO3)2) complexes. The higher value indicated that the larger and abundant pores were generated in the cellulose acetate at the same water-pressure. Thus, it could be thought that the Cd(NO3)2·4H2O salt played a role as a stronger plasticizer than the other metal nitrate salts such as Ni(NO3)2 and Mg(NO3)2. These results were attributable to the fact that the atomic radius and ionic radius of the Cd were largest among the three elements, resulting in the relatively larger Cd of the Cd(NO3)2 that could easily be dissociated into cations and NO3- ions. As a result, the free NO3- ions could be readily hydrated with water molecules, causing the plasticization effect on the chains of cellulose acetate. The coordinative interactions between the CA and Cd(NO3)2·4H2O were investigated by IR spectroscopy. The change of ionic species in Cd(NO3)2·4H2O was analyzed by Raman spectroscopy.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose acetate; ionic radius; porosity; water-pressure
Year: 2020 PMID: 32340116 PMCID: PMC7240385 DOI: 10.3390/polym12040981
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1SEM images: (a) plane view of porous CA polymer exposed to external water-pressures (scale bar = 200 μm), (b) the enlarged red-dot square in plane view (scale bar = 10 μm), (c) cross-section view (scale bar = 50 μm) and (d) enlarged view of cross-section (scale bar = 5 μm).
Figure 2Flux measured through neat CA and CA with Cd(NO3)2·4H2O at various water pressures.
Atomic radius and ionic radius of various elements utilized.
| Elements | Atomic Radius (pm) | Ionic Radius (pm) |
|---|---|---|
| Cd | 155 | 109 |
| Ni | 135 | 83 |
| Mg | 150 | 86 |
| Zn | 135 | 88 |
Figure 3FT-IR spectra of neat CA and 1/0.35 CA/Cd(NO3)2·4H2O polymer matrix at 0 bar and 8 bar water pressures: (a) total range and (b) enlarged specific region.
Figure 4TGA analysis of neat CA and CA/Cd(NO3)2·4H2O polymer matrix at 0 bar and 8 bar.
Figure 5Raman spectra of neat Cd(NO3)2·4H2O and CA/Cd(NO3)2·4H2O polymer matrix.
Figure 6Deconvoluted Raman spectra for NO3− in the CA/Cd(NO3)2·4H2O composite.
Comparison of free ions, ion pair, and ionic aggregates % for NO3− in Cd(NO3)2 in CA.
| Free ions % | Ion Pair % | Ionic Aggregates % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cd(NO3)2 in CA | 51.63% | 19.52% | 28.85% |
Scheme 1Comparison of pore generation by species of metal salts in cellulose acetate.