Literature DB >> 32340039

Does N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Improve the Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope?

Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy1, Andrew D McRae2, Brian H Rowe3, Marco L A Sivilotti4, Muhammad Mukarram5, Marie-Joe Nemnom5, Ronald A Booth6, Lisa A Calder1, Ian G Stiell1, George A Wells6, Wei Cheng6, Monica Taljaard7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported that natriuretic peptides provide prognostic information for emergency department (ED) syncope.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether adding N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) improves prediction of 30-day serious adverse events (SAEs).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: 6 EDs in 2 Canadian provinces. PARTICIPANTS: 1452 adult ED patients with syncope. INTERVENTION: Serum NT-proBNP was measured locally at 1 site and batch processed at a central laboratory from other sites. The concentrations were not available to treating physicians or for adjudication of outcomes. MEASUREMENTS: An adjudicated composite outcome of 30-day SAEs, including death and cardiac (arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic) and noncardiac events.
RESULTS: Of 1452 patients enrolled, 152 (10.5% [95% CI, 9.0% to 12.1%]) had 30-day SAEs, 57 (3.9%) of which were identified after the index ED disposition. Serum NT-proBNP concentrations were significantly higher among patients with SAEs than those without them (median, 626.5 ng/L vs. 81 ng/L; P < 0.001). Adding NT-proBNP values to the CSRS did not significantly improve prognostication (c-statistic, 0.89 and 0.90; P = 0.12 for difference), regardless of SAE subgroup or whether the SAE was identified after the index ED visit. The net reclassification index shows that NT-proBNP would have correctly reclassified 3% of patients with SAEs at the expense of incorrectly reclassifying 2% of patients without SAEs. LIMITATIONS: Our study was powered to detect a 3% difference in the area under the curve. The heterogeneity of outcomes and robust baseline discrimination by the CSRS will make improvements challenging.
CONCLUSION: Although serum NT-proBNP concentrations were generally much higher among ED patients with syncope who had a 30-day SAE, this blood test added little new information to the CSRS. Routine use of NT-proBNP for ED syncope prognostication is not recommended. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arrhythmia; Attention; Cardiovascular therapy; Electrocardiography; Hematologic tests; Hemorrhage; Natriuretic peptide; Research laboratories; Syncope; Troponin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32340039     DOI: 10.7326/M19-3515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  3 in total

1.  Trends in Utilization and Yield of Inpatient Transthoracic Echocardiography for Syncope: Impact of Cardiac Biomarkers.

Authors:  Linda Lee; Satish Mishra; Deyu Sun; Stephanie A Besser; Victor Mor-Avi; Roberto M Lang; R Parker Ward
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 7.722

Review 2.  A Rational Evaluation of the Syncope Patient: Optimizing the Emergency Department Visit.

Authors:  Tarek Hatoum; Robert S Sheldon
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Etiology, risk factors, and prognosis of patients with syncope: A single-center analysis.

Authors:  Lin Ling; Tingting Feng; Xiaofeng Xue; Zicheng Ling
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.