Literature DB >> 32339774

Changes in the intracranial volume from early adulthood to the sixth decade of life: A longitudinal study.

Yaron Caspi1, Rachel M Brouwer2, Hugo G Schnack2, Marieke E van de Nieuwenhuijzen2, Wiepke Cahn2, René S Kahn3, Wiro J Niessen4, Aad van der Lugt4, Hilleke Hulshoff Pol5.   

Abstract

Normal brain-aging occurs at all structural levels. Excessive pathophysiological changes in the brain, beyond the normal one, are implicated in the etiology of brain disorders such as severe forms of the schizophrenia spectrum and dementia. To account for brain-aging in health and disease, it is critical to study the age-dependent trajectories of brain biomarkers at various levels and among different age groups. The intracranial volume (ICV) is a key biological marker, and changes in the ICV during the lifespan can teach us about the biology of development, aging, and gene X environment interactions. However, whether ICV changes with age in adulthood is not resolved. Applying a semi-automatic in-house-built algorithm for ICV extraction on T1w MR brain scans in the Dutch longitudinal cohort (GROUP), we measured ICV changes. Individuals between the ages of 16 and 55 years were scanned up to three consecutive times with 3.32±0.32 years between consecutive scans (N = 482, 359, 302). Using the extracted ICVs, we calculated ICV longitudinal aging-trajectories based on three analysis methods; direct calculation of ICV differences between the first and the last scan, fitting all ICV measurements of individuals to a straight line, and applying a global linear mixed model fitting. We report statistically significant increase in the ICV in adulthood until the fourth decade of life (average change +0.03%/y, or about 0.5 ml/y, at age 20), and decrease in the ICV afterward (-0.09%/y, or about -1.2 ml/y, at age 55). To account for previous cross-sectional reports of ICV changes, we analyzed the same data using a cross-sectional approach. Our cross-sectional analysis detected ICV changes consistent with the previously reported cross-sectional effect. However, the reported amount of cross-sectional changes within this age range was significantly larger than the longitudinal changes. We attribute the cross-sectional results to a generational effect. In conclusion, the human intracranial volume does not stay constant during adulthood but instead shows a small increase during young adulthood and a decrease thereafter from the fourth decade of life. The age-related changes in the longitudinalmeasure are smaller than those reported using cross-sectional approaches and unlikely to affect structural brain imaging studies correcting for intracranial volume considerably. As to the possible mechanisms involved, this awaits further study, although thickening of the meninges and skull bones have been proposed, as well as a smaller amount of brain fluids addition above the overall loss of brain tissue.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Cross-sectional design; Intracranial volume; Longitudinal design; Structural MRI

Year:  2020        PMID: 32339774     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  Prediction of Chronological Age in Healthy Elderly Subjects with Machine Learning from MRI Brain Segmentation and Cortical Parcellation.

Authors:  Jaime Gómez-Ramírez; Miguel A Fernández-Blázquez; Javier J González-Rosa
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 2.  Are Brain and Cognitive Reserve Shaped by Early Life Circumstances?

Authors:  Susanne R de Rooij
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  De-identification procedures for magnetic resonance images and the impact on structural brain measures at different ages.

Authors:  Elizabeth E L Buimer; Hugo G Schnack; Yaron Caspi; Neeltje E M van Haren; Mikhail Milchenko; Pascal Pas; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; Rachel M Brouwer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Automated Segmentation of Midbrain Structures in High-Resolution Susceptibility Maps Based on Convolutional Neural Network and Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhao; Yida Wang; Fangfang Zhou; Gaiying Li; Zhichao Wang; Haodong Zhong; Yang Song; Kelly M Gillen; Yi Wang; Guang Yang; Jianqi Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Schizophrenia and Bipolar Polygenic Risk Scores in Relation to Intracranial Volume.

Authors:  Sonja M C de Zwarte; Rachel M Brouwer; René S Kahn; Neeltje E M van Haren
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  A comparison of intracranial volume estimation methods and their cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with age.

Authors:  Stener Nerland; Therese S Stokkan; Kjetil N Jørgensen; Laura A Wortinger; Geneviève Richard; Dani Beck; Dennis van der Meer; Lars T Westlye; Ole A Andreassen; Ingrid Agartz; Claudia Barth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.399

7.  Brain structural correlates of recurrence following the first episode in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Hannah Lemke; Hannah Klute; Jennifer Skupski; Katharina Thiel; Lena Waltemate; Alexandra Winter; Fabian Breuer; Susanne Meinert; Melissa Klug; Verena Enneking; Nils R Winter; Dominik Grotegerd; Elisabeth J Leehr; Jonathan Repple; Katharina Dohm; Nils Opel; Frederike Stein; Tina Meller; Katharina Brosch; Kai G Ringwald; Julia-Katharina Pfarr; Florian Thomas-Odenthal; Tim Hahn; Axel Krug; Andreas Jansen; Walter Heindel; Igor Nenadić; Tilo Kircher; Udo Dannlowski
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 7.989

8.  Proportional intracranial volume correction differentially biases behavioral predictions across neuroanatomical features, sexes, and development.

Authors:  Elvisha Dhamala; Leon Qi Rong Ooi; Jianzhong Chen; Ru Kong; Kevin M Anderson; Rowena Chin; B T Thomas Yeo; Avram J Holmes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 7.400

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.