Literature DB >> 3233950

The development, use, and reliability of the brief psychiatric rating scale (nursing modification)--an assessment procedure for the nursing team in clinical and research settings.

P D McGorry1, R J Goodwin, G W Stuart.   

Abstract

The role of nursing staff in the systematic rating of psychopathology has been explored in a small number of studies in recent years. Nurses are uniquely placed to carry out relatively continuous observations of high validity which are sensitive to change, yet on the basis of the limited data available, some doubts remain concerning the reliability of such ratings, particularly when they extend to nonobservational phenomena. Nevertheless, since in practice nurse ratings form an important part of the psychopathological assessment arm in many research settings, continuing uncertainty about their reliability is clearly undesirable. Following a brief review of nurse rating, this report describes the role of the nursing team in a developing research environment and reports interrater reliability data for randomly selected pairings of nurses drawn from a mainstream clinical team who had been trained in the use of a specially modified version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (Nursing Modification) (BPRS[NM]). The findings indicate that nursing staff can reliably rate this range of psychopathology under ordinary clinical conditions, provided they have been properly trained and that appropriate modifications have been made to the procedure. Although validity was not formally assessed in this study, the extension of the time period covered by the BPRS, combined with the special place of nurses in the ward milieu can also be expected to enhance the validity and sensitivity of the ratings. Other effects of the involvement of therapeutically-oriented nursing staff in research procedures are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3233950     DOI: 10.1016/0010-440x(88)90078-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0010-440X            Impact factor:   3.735


  4 in total

1.  Investigation of structural brain correlates of neurological soft signs in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Ya Wang; Esmee E Braam; Cassandra M J Wannan; Tamsyn E Van Rheenen; Raymond C K Chan; Barnaby Nelson; Patrick D McGorry; Alison R Yung; Ashleigh Lin; Warrick J Brewer; John Koutsogiannis; Stephen J Wood; Dennis Velakoulis; Christos Pantelis; Vanessa L Cropley
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Altered resting-state connectivity in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Geumsook Shim; Jungsu S Oh; Wi Hoon Jung; Joon Hwan Jang; Chi-Hoon Choi; Euitae Kim; Hye-Yoon Park; Jung-Seok Choi; Myung Hun Jung; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.759

3.  Validation of the Routine Assessment of Patient Progress (RAPP) in patients with psychosis in South India.

Authors:  H Charles; T John; S Chandy; P Ezhilarasu; B Antonisamy; K S Jacob
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Validity and reliability of the Persian version of Violence Risk Screening-10 Instrument (V-Risk-10) in admitted patients to the psychiatric ward.

Authors:  Zahra Mostafavian; Golkoo Hosseini; Elham Masoudi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.985

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.