Literature DB >> 32339095

Deep learning for mass detection in Full Field Digital Mammograms.

Richa Agarwal1, Oliver Díaz2, Moi Hoon Yap3, Xavier Lladó4, Robert Martí5.   

Abstract

In recent years, the use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in medical imaging has shown improved performance in terms of mass detection and classification compared to current state-of-the-art methods. This paper proposes a fully automated framework to detect masses in Full-Field Digital Mammograms (FFDM). This is based on the Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster-RCNN) model and is applied for detecting masses in the large-scale OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database (OMI-DB), which consists of ∼80,000 FFDMs mainly from Hologic and General Electric (GE) scanners. This research is the first to benchmark the performance of deep learning on OMI-DB. The proposed framework obtained a True Positive Rate (TPR) of 0.93 at 0.78 False Positive per Image (FPI) on FFDMs from the Hologic scanner. Transfer learning is then used in the Faster R-CNN model trained on Hologic images to detect masses in smaller databases containing FFDMs from the GE scanner and another public dataset INbreast (Siemens scanner). The detection framework obtained a TPR of 0.91±0.06 at 1.69 FPI for images from the GE scanner and also showed higher performance compared to state-of-the-art methods on the INbreast dataset, obtaining a TPR of 0.99±0.03 at 1.17 FPI for malignant and 0.85±0.08 at 1.0 FPI for benign masses, showing the potential to be used as part of an advanced CAD system for breast cancer screening.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNN; Deep learning; FFDM; Mammogram; Mass detection

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32339095     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  6 in total

1.  OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database: A Large-Scale Resource of Mammography Images and Clinical Data.

Authors:  Mark D Halling-Brown; Lucy M Warren; Dominic Ward; Emma Lewis; Alistair Mackenzie; Matthew G Wallis; Louise S Wilkinson; Rosalind M Given-Wilson; Rita McAvinchey; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-11-25

Review 2.  Image Augmentation Techniques for Mammogram Analysis.

Authors:  Parita Oza; Paawan Sharma; Samir Patel; Festus Adedoyin; Alessandro Bruno
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Breast Tumor Detection and Classification in Mammogram Images Using Modified YOLOv5 Network.

Authors:  Aqsa Mohiyuddin; Asma Basharat; Usman Ghani; Veselý Peter; Sidra Abbas; Osama Bin Naeem; Muhammad Rizwan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Can a Computer-Aided Mass Diagnosis Model Based on Perceptive Features Learned From Quantitative Mammography Radiology Reports Improve Junior Radiologists' Diagnosis Performance? An Observer Study.

Authors:  Zilong He; Yue Li; Weixiong Zeng; Weimin Xu; Jialing Liu; Xiangyuan Ma; Jun Wei; Hui Zeng; Zeyuan Xu; Sina Wang; Chanjuan Wen; Jiefang Wu; Chenya Feng; Mengwei Ma; Genggeng Qin; Yao Lu; Weiguo Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Evolution of research trends in artificial intelligence for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis over the past two decades: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Asif Hassan Syed; Tabrej Khan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  A preliminary analysis of AI based smartphone application for diagnosis of COVID-19 using chest X-ray images.

Authors:  Aravind Krishnaswamy Rangarajan; Hari Krishnan Ramachandran
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 6.954

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.