Rachel Widome1, Aaron T Berger1, Conrad Iber2, Kyla Wahlstrom3, Melissa N Laska1, Gudrun Kilian1, Susan Redline4, Darin J Erickson1. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis. 2. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis. 3. Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 4. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Sleep is a resource that has been associated with health and well-being; however, sleep insufficiency is common among adolescents. Objective: To examine how delaying school start time is associated with objectively assessed sleep duration, timing, and quality in a cohort of adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study took advantage of district-initiated modifications in the starting times of 5 public high schools in the metropolitan area of Minneapolis and St Paul, Minnesota. A total of 455 students were followed up from grade 9 (May 3 to June 3, 2016) through grade 11 (March 15 to May 21, 2018). Data were analyzed from February 1 to July 24, 2019. Exposures: All 5 participating schools started early (7:30 am or 7:45 am) at baseline (2016). At follow-up 1 (2017) and continuing through follow-up 2 (2018), 2 schools delayed their start times by 50 and 65 minutes, whereas 3 comparison schools started at 7:30 am throughout the observation period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Wrist actigraphy was used to derive indices of sleep duration, timing, and quality. With a difference-in-difference design, linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate differences in changes in sleep time between delayed-start and comparison schools. Results: A total of 455 students were included in the analysis (among those identifying sex, 225 girls [49.5%] and 219 boys [48.1%]; mean [SD] age at baseline, 15.2 [0.3] years). Relative to the change observed in the comparison schools, students who attended delayed-start schools had an additional mean 41 (95% CI, 25-57) objectively measured minutes of night sleep at follow-up 1 and 43 (95% CI, 25-61) at follow-up 2. Delayed start times were not associated with falling asleep later on school nights at follow-ups, and students attending these schools had a mean difference-in-differences change in weekend night sleep of -24 (95% CI, -51 to 2) minutes from baseline to follow-up 1 and -34 (95% CI, -65 to -3) minutes from baseline to follow-up 2, relative to comparison school participants. Differences in differences for school night sleep onset, weekend sleep onset latency, sleep midpoints, sleep efficiency, and the sleep fragmentation index between the 2 conditions were minimal. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that delaying high school start times could extend adolescent school night sleep duration and lessen their need for catch-up sleep on weekends. These findings suggest that later start times could be a durable strategy for addressing population-wide adolescent sleep deficits.
Importance: Sleep is a resource that has been associated with health and well-being; however, sleep insufficiency is common among adolescents. Objective: To examine how delaying school start time is associated with objectively assessed sleep duration, timing, and quality in a cohort of adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study took advantage of district-initiated modifications in the starting times of 5 public high schools in the metropolitan area of Minneapolis and St Paul, Minnesota. A total of 455 students were followed up from grade 9 (May 3 to June 3, 2016) through grade 11 (March 15 to May 21, 2018). Data were analyzed from February 1 to July 24, 2019. Exposures: All 5 participating schools started early (7:30 am or 7:45 am) at baseline (2016). At follow-up 1 (2017) and continuing through follow-up 2 (2018), 2 schools delayed their start times by 50 and 65 minutes, whereas 3 comparison schools started at 7:30 am throughout the observation period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Wrist actigraphy was used to derive indices of sleep duration, timing, and quality. With a difference-in-difference design, linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate differences in changes in sleep time between delayed-start and comparison schools. Results: A total of 455 students were included in the analysis (among those identifying sex, 225 girls [49.5%] and 219 boys [48.1%]; mean [SD] age at baseline, 15.2 [0.3] years). Relative to the change observed in the comparison schools, students who attended delayed-start schools had an additional mean 41 (95% CI, 25-57) objectively measured minutes of night sleep at follow-up 1 and 43 (95% CI, 25-61) at follow-up 2. Delayed start times were not associated with falling asleep later on school nights at follow-ups, and students attending these schools had a mean difference-in-differences change in weekend night sleep of -24 (95% CI, -51 to 2) minutes from baseline to follow-up 1 and -34 (95% CI, -65 to -3) minutes from baseline to follow-up 2, relative to comparison school participants. Differences in differences for school night sleep onset, weekend sleep onset latency, sleep midpoints, sleep efficiency, and the sleep fragmentation index between the 2 conditions were minimal. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that delaying high school start times could extend adolescent school night sleep duration and lessen their need for catch-up sleep on weekends. These findings suggest that later start times could be a durable strategy for addressing population-wide adolescent sleep deficits.
Authors: Karen A Patte; Wei Qian; Adam G Cole; Guy Faulkner; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Valerie Carson; Scott T Leatherdale Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Robert Marx; Emily E Tanner-Smith; Colleen M Davison; Lee-Anne Ufholz; John Freeman; Ravi Shankar; Lisa Newton; Robert S Brown; Alyssa S Parpia; Ioana Cozma; Shawn Hendrikx Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-07-03
Authors: Gideon P Dunster; Luciano de la Iglesia; Miriam Ben-Hamo; Claire Nave; Jason G Fleischer; Satchidananda Panda; Horacio O de la Iglesia Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Lucia Magee; Lucy P Goldsmith; Umar A R Chaudhry; Angela S Donin; Charlotte Wahlich; Elizabeth Stovold; Claire M Nightingale; Alicja R Rudnicka; Christopher G Owen Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 26.796
Authors: Jonathan A Mitchell; Knashawn H Morales; Ariel A Williamson; Nicholas Huffnagle; Casey Eck; Abigail Jawahar; Lionola Juste; Alexander G Fiks; Babette S Zemel; David F Dinges Journal: Sleep Adv Date: 2021-04-15
Authors: Kaitlyn M Berry; Aaron T Berger; Melissa N Laska; Darin J Erickson; Kathleen M Lenk; Conrad Iber; Kelsie M Full; Kyla Wahlstrom; Susan Redline; Rachel Widome Journal: Sleep Health Date: 2021-09-01
Authors: Anna M Biller; Carmen Molenda; Fabian Obster; Giulia Zerbini; Christian Förtsch; Till Roenneberg; Eva C Winnebeck Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jonathan A Mitchell; Knashawn H Morales; Ariel A Williamson; Nicholas Huffnagle; Casey Eck; Abigail Jawahar; Lionola Juste; Alexander G Fiks; Babette S Zemel; David F Dinges Journal: medRxiv Date: 2020-11-07