Literature DB >> 32338333

Factor Xa inhibitors in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Vishal Y Parikh1, Umang M Parikh2, Angel Moctezuma-Ramirez2, Harveen K Lamba2, Joggy K George2, Savitri Fedson2, Ajith P Nair2, O H Frazier2, Reynolds M Delgado3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Warfarin is standard anticoagulation therapy for patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). However, warfarin requires regular monitoring and dosage adjustments and fails for many patients, causing thromboembolic and bleeding events. Factor Xa inhibitors have been shown to be noninferior to warfarin in preventing strokes and are associated with less intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation. We evaluated treatment safety and effectiveness in CF-LVAD patients who switched from warfarin to a factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban or rivaroxaban) after warfarin failure.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients treated between 2008 and 2018. We assessed the occurrence of stroke, non-central nervous system (CNS) embolism, pump thrombosis, and major gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage during therapy.
RESULTS: We identified seven patients: five were male, the average body mass index was 30 kg/m2, and average age was 56 years. Preimplantation comorbidities included hypertension (all patients) and diabetes mellitus, ischemic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and previous myocardial infarction (four patients each). Overall, patients received warfarin for 3968 days and apixaban/rivaroxaban for 1459 days. The warfarin group was within the therapeutic INR range (2.0-3.0) 30% of the time. Complication rates did not differ between warfarin and apixaban/rivaroxaban: strokes, 0.20 vs none, non-CNS embolism, 0.54 vs none; pump thrombosis, 0.27 vs none; major gastrointestinal bleeding, 0.20 vs 0.50; intracranial hemorrhage, 0.13 vs none.
CONCLUSIONS: Factor Xa inhibitors may be viable treatment options for CF-LVAD patients for whom warfarin therapy has failed. Large prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Bleeding; Circulatory support devices; Coagulation/anticoagulation; Thrombosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32338333     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-020-01371-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  2 in total

Review 1.  Antithrombotic therapy for durable left ventricular assist devices - current strategies and future directions.

Authors:  Noah Weingarten; Cindy Song; Amit Iyengar; David Alan Herbst; Mark Helmers; Danika Meldrum; Sara Guevara-Plunkett; Jessica Dominic; Pavan Atluri
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-09-21

2.  Percutaneous approach to left ventricular assist device decommissioning.

Authors:  Francesco Moroni; Keyur B Shah; Mohammed A Quader; Katherine Klein; Melissa C Smallfield; Kendall E Parris; Zachary M Gertz
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.585

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.