In this work, we report the synthesis of silicon aerogel elastomers (SAEs) by one-pot hydrolytic condensation of silanes, followed by drying at room temperature. The as-synthesized SAE features excellent flexibility and mechanical robustness, for example, a high compressive strength of up to 40 kPa at 75% strain was achieved. Combined with their thermal insulation properties (a low thermal conductivity of ca. 0.02 W m -1 K -1 in air), for the first time, such SAEs were used as a porous platform for both flame-retardant measurement and solar steam generation. By coating with Mg(OH)2 via a facile coprecipitation method, the treated SAEs show excellent flame retardancy with a peak heat release rate of 25.61 kW m-2, in addition to high fire resistance and excellent smoke suppression. When used as a solar steam generator, their evaporation efficiency was measured to be 82.7% (1 kW m-2), which could compete with that of other high-performance bilayered photothermal materials reported so far. Taking advantage of their simple and cost-efficient manufacture and superior mechanical robustness and flexibility, such SAEs with multifunctionalities may have great potential for a wide variety of energy-saving applications, for example, especially for thermal insulation coatings with better flame retardancy and efficient solar steam generation for desalination or freshwater production.
In this work, we report the synthesis of silicon aerogel elastomers (SAEs) by one-pot hydrolytic condensation of silanes, followed by drying at room temperature. The as-synthesized SAE features excellent flexibility and mechanical robustness, for example, a high compressive strength of up to 40 kPa at 75% strain was achieved. Combined with their thermal insulation properties (a low thermal conductivity of ca. 0.02 W m -1 K -1 in air), for the first time, such SAEs were used as a porous platform for both flame-retardant measurement and solar steam generation. By coating with Mg(OH)2 via a facile coprecipitation method, the treated SAEs show excellent flame retardancy with a peak heat release rate of 25.61 kW m-2, in addition to high fire resistance and excellent smoke suppression. When used as a solar steam generator, their evaporation efficiency was measured to be 82.7% (1 kW m-2), which could compete with that of other high-performance bilayered photothermal materials reported so far. Taking advantage of their simple and cost-efficient manufacture and superior mechanical robustness and flexibility, such SAEs with multifunctionalities may have great potential for a wide variety of energy-saving applications, for example, especially for thermal insulation coatings with better flame retardancy and efficient solar steam generation for desalination or freshwater production.
Micro-
or nanoporous materials have been the subject of intense
interest for both industrial and academic communities for a great
variety of applications.[1,2] Among them, aerogels,
which usually have very low apparent densities and large specific
surface areas, have attracted extensive attention.[3,4] To
date, a number of aerogels have been developed,[5−16] including carbon-based aerogels, organic aerogels, and inorganic
aerogels. Silicon aerogels are one of the most famous candidates known
as excellent thermal insulators owing to their larger open pores,
high porosity with inner surface areas, and extremely low thermal
conductivity.[17,18] In addition, silicon aerogels
can be easily manufactured in monolithic shape, which thus endows
them with good practical processability. Until now, silicon aerogels
have found useful applications[19,20] in building thermal
insulation, solar energy saving, spacecraft, and optical applications.
However, unfortunately, silicon aerogels are usually brittle and fragile
in nature, which corresponds to their weak three-dimensional framework
structure that consists of necklace-like connection of silica particles.
Such poor mechanical properties dramatically impair their processability
and thus restrict their widespread applications.[21,22] So far, a variety of methods have been employed to improve the mechanical
properties of silicon aerogels, including chemical cross-linking,
doping with nanofillers, template methods, and so forth; however,
these methods usually have their respective drawbacks such as expensive
or complicated multistep manufacture.[23,24] In many cases,
the improvement of mechanical properties of silicon aerogels by these
methods comes at the cost of sacrificing their other functionalities,
for example, increase of densities and thermal conductivity or decrease
of porosity and specific surface area.[25−28] Worse still, in some cases, these
modified silicon aerogels or hybrid silicon aerogels incorporated
with polymers or nanofillers, on the other hand, show a dramatic decrease
in their flame retardancy because of the flammable nature of the organics
or carbon-based fillers, making them unsuitable for thermal insulation,[29,30] especially in building construction and other special applications,
for example, flame retardants[31−33] and solar steam generation.[34,35] Thus, the exploitation of a simple but efficient approach to enhance
their mechanical properties is urgently needed.In this work,
we report the synthesis of silicon aerogel elastomers
(SAEs) with excellent mechanical robustness and flexibility by one-pot
hydrolytic condensation of silanes, followed by drying at room temperature.
Combined with their low thermal conductivity of ca. 0.02 W m–1 K–1 in air, the
as-synthesized SAEs show excellent flame retardancy and high steam
generation efficiency. To our knowledge, the employment of such SAEsas a porous platform as either flame retardants or solar steam generators
has never been reported so far. The findings of this work, however,
may open a new possibility for the future creation of multifunctional
silicon aerogels with enhanced mechanical properties for a great variety
of applications, for example, thermal insulation coatings, solar steam
generation for desalination or freshwater production, and so on.
Materials
and Methods
Materials
Acetic acid and urea were purchased from
Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., and the surfactant n-hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) was obtained from J &
K. Dimethyldimethoxysilane (DMDMS) and methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMS)
were purchased from Macklin. All of the chemical reagents were used
as received without further purification.
Methods
Preparation
of SAE-1
SAEs were synthesized through
a facile one-pot reaction. Typically, aqueous acetic acid solution
(15 mL, 5 mM), urea (5.0 g), and the surfactant CTAC (0.80 g) were
added into a glass test tube, followed by adding MTMS (3.0 mL) and
DMDMS (2.0 mL) under vigorous stirring at ambient temperature for
60 min until a homogeneous solution was achieved. After transferring
the as-obtained sol into a tight SAE container, the reaction system
was transferred into a forced convection oven and the mixture was
heated at 80 °C for 24 h until complete gelation and aging. After
that, the as-prepared products (gels) were washed with methanol several
times followed by soaking and squeezing several times to ensure the
complete removal of the residual impurities. Then, the xerogels were
obtained after drying the samples under ambient conditions.
Preparation
of SAE-2
The purpose is to treat a layer
of magnesium hydroxideflame-retardant coating on the surface of silicon
aerogels. This method of synthesizing SAE-2 is similar to the layer-by-layer
method. A solution of 1.425 g of magnesium chloride was weighed into
a solution using a beaker. Another beaker was taken and 1.2 g of sodium
hydroxide was weighed to be dissolved. The assembly process is as
follows: first, the silicon aerogel was immersed into the magnesium
chloride solution for 5 min, and the excess magnesium chloride solution
was washed away with deionized water; then, the sample was immersed
into the sodium hydroxide solution for 5 min, and the excess sodium
hydroxide solution was washed again with deionized water. The above
process is a loop. After treatment, the weight increase is found to
be about 28%.
Characterization
The morphologies
of SAE aerogels were
analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6701F, JEOL, Ltd.) 13C cross-polarization/magic angle spinning NMR spectra were
recorded using a 400 MHz solid-state nuclear magnetic analyzer test.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Nexus
670 spectrum instrument. The TDA curves of the samples were tested
by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, PerkinElmer) at a heating rate
of 10 °C min–1 under a nitrogen/air atmosphere.
The measurement of powder X-ray diffraction patterns was performed
on a D/Max-2400 X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Miniflex, Japan) using
Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 100 mA from 2 to 80°. The
contact angle (CA) of water samples was measured using a CA meter
(DSA100, Kruss). The thermal conductivity of the samples was measured
using a multifunction rapid thermal conductivity tester (DRE-III,
China). The torch burn test was conducted by exposing the sample to
direct flame produced from a butane torch at a 45° angle for
10 s. Both the horizontal flame test (HFT) and cone calorimetry (CONE)
tests were performed according to our previous work.[36] X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses of the
SAE were performed using an ESCALAB 250Xi X-ray photoelectron spectrometer.
A Ux50 high speed camera was purchased from Chengdu Tusheng Technology
Co., Ltd. The SAE surface was illuminated with a solar simulator (xenon
arc lamp, CEL-S500, Ceaulight) equipped with a solar filter (AM 1.5,
Ceaulight). The temperature of the sample surface was observed using
an IR thermal camera (Thermal Imager TESTO 869, Testo SE & Co.
KGaA, Germany). The solar steam generation measurement is performed
according to our previous study[12] (the
experiment was performed at 22.5 °C, experiment humidity was
40%, and wind speed was almost zero throughout the experiment).
Results and Discussion
Fabrication and Structure Characterizations
of SAE-1 and SAE-2
As shown in Figure a, we have prepared SAEs using methyltrimethoxysilane
(MTMS) and
dimethyldimethoxysilane (DMDMS) as precursors through a simple one-pot
method. The molecular level structures of SAEs were analyzed by FTIR,
and the FTIR spectra of SAEs are shown in Figure b. The peaks at 840–670 cm–1 are ascribed to the telescopic vibration of Si and C. The peaks
at 1090–920 cm–1 are ascribed to the stretching
vibration of Si–O, and the absorption peaks in the range 1340–1270
cm–1 are attributed to the C–H bending vibration.
The peaks at 2920 cm–1 are assigned to the C–H
stretching vibration, indicating that the compound contains −CH3. The structures of SAE were further confirmed with the solid-state 29Si NMR spectrum, as shown in Figure c. D1 confirms to Si species with
one siloxane bond, and D2 confirms to fully condensed Si
species of DMDMS. T2 confirms to condensed Si species with
two siloxane bonds, and T3 confirms to fully condensed
Si species of MTMS. The SEM images of SAE-1 and SAE-2 are shown in Figure d. It can be seen
that SAE-1 is composed of interconnected irregular spheres with a
diameter in the range of 1.7–2.1 μm. In addition, the
surface morphology of SAE-1 spheres is much smoother than that of
SAE-2. At the same time, the SEM image clearly shows that the surface
of SAE-2 is extremely rough, and we initially judged that this was
mainly due to the accumulation of magnesium hydroxide particles in
the structure of spherical SAEs. Furthermore, both the SAE samples
have a porous three-dimensional network structure where interpenetrated
pores with nanometer size are present in the materials. In order to
verify our conjecture, the chemical composition of SAE samples was
measured by XPS. The XPS spectra of SAE-1 and Mg(OH)2-treated
SAE-2 are shown in Figure e. In the XPS spectra, peaks appear at 540, 280, 160, and
108 eV, indicating that both SAE-1 and SAE-2 contain the carbon element,
silicon, and oxygen. SAE-2 did not lose these conventional elements
because of postprocessing. After treatment of SAE-2 with Mg(OH)2, the combination of the binding energy at 308 eV in SAE-2
is the characteristic peak of magnesium, which confirms our previous
conjecture that magnesium has been successfully incorporated onto
the SAE.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic diagram of the synthesis of the SAE. (b) FTIR spectra
of the SAE. (c) Solid-state 29Si NMR spectrum of the SAE.
(d) SEM images of the unmodified SAE (above, scale bar: 10 μm
for the left picture and 1 μm for the middle and right picture)
and modified SAE (below, scale bar: 10 μm for the left picture
and 1 μm for the middle and right picture). (e) XPS spectra
of SAE-1 and Mg(OH)2-treated SAE-2.
(a) Schematic diagram of the synthesis of the SAE. (b) FTIR spectra
of the SAE. (c) Solid-state 29Si NMR spectrum of the SAE.
(d) SEM images of the unmodified SAE (above, scale bar: 10 μm
for the left picture and 1 μm for the middle and right picture)
and modified SAE (below, scale bar: 10 μm for the left picture
and 1 μm for the middle and right picture). (e) XPS spectra
of SAE-1 and Mg(OH)2-treated SAE-2.
Mechanical Properties of SAEs
Unlike conventional silicon
aerogels, SAEs are mechanically robust, superelastic, and flexible
owing to their unique porous three-dimensional network structure which
consists of interpenetrated pores inside silicone. We investigated
the mechanical properties of the SAE through uniaxial compression
under different strains such as 30, 50, and 75%. As shown in Figure a, after compression,
the as-prepared SAE can recover its original shape. Besides, it has
also shown excellent elasticity under 75% strain. As depicted in Figure b, the SAE can be
repeatedly compressed at 75% strain for 10 cycles without damage to
the structure (Figure b), indicating the excellent mechanical property of the SAE. Wettability
measurements show that both SAE-1 and SAE-2 interestingly have a superhydrophobic
surface with a water CA of 155.6° for SAE-1 (Figure d left) and 155.1° (Figure d right) for SAE-2.
Such superhydrophobicity should be attributed to both the rough structure
of the SAE by random aggregation of nanospheres and their inherently
hydrophobic chemistry in nature, which may endow them with additional
functionality for special applications, for example, as ultralight,
self-cleaning, and thermal insulation coatings for exterior wall materials
in modern buildings.
Figure 2
Mechanical properties of the SAE. (a) Compressive σ vs ε curves during loading −unloading cycles
with increasing ε amplitude. (b) 10-cycle fatigue test with
a compressive ε of 75%. (c) Camera photographs of compression
and bending of the SAE. (d) Water CA of SAE-1 and SAE-2.
Mechanical properties of the SAE. (a) Compressive σ vs ε curves during loading −unloading cycles
with increasing ε amplitude. (b) 10-cycle fatigue test with
a compressive ε of 75%. (c) Camera photographs of compression
and bending of the SAE. (d) Water CA of SAE-1 and SAE-2.
Thermal Conductivity
Undoubtedly, the SAE samples feature
low thermal conductivity, just similar to the conventional silicon
aerogels. Thermal conductivity measurements show that the SAE exhibits
a very low thermal conductivity of 19 mW m–1 K–1 at room temperature. To further intuitively evaluate
the thermal insulation property of the SAE, a comparative experiment
was performed by heating thick plates made of SAE, iron, and glass
on a heating stage at 200 °C, followed by placing fresh petals
on top of each plate. As shown in Figure a, petals on the SAE showed a slight wilting
after 10 min of heating; moreover, the flowers on other plates were
burnt and withered, indicating the excellent thermal insulation properties
of the SAE. To further detect the dynamic temperature changes of the
SAE during heating, an infrared (IR) camera was employed to monitor
the changes in surface temperature of the SAE. As shown in Figure b, observing the
temperature gradient of the SAE heating plate, the top temperature
of the SAE was maintained at around 45 °C, after being placed
on a 200 °C heating stage for 1 min, and the temperature increased
to about 55 °C at about 10 min of heating and then remained constant
at 20 min of heating. These also prove that SAEs have strong thermal
insulation properties.
Figure 3
Thermal insulation properties of the SAE. (a) Thermal
insulation
capacity of the SAE compared with that of Fe and glass materials for
protecting fresh petals from withering. (b) Optical and IR images
of the SAE on a 200 °C heating stage for 20 min.
Thermal insulation properties of the SAE. (a) Thermal
insulation
capacity of the SAE compared with that of Fe and glass materials for
protecting fresh petals from withering. (b) Optical and IR images
of the SAE on a 200 °C heating stage for 20 min.
Fire Resistance
The thermal stabilities of SAE-1 and
SAE-2 were investigated by TGA under a nitrogen atmosphere. As shown
in Figure a, both
SAE-1 and SAE-2 show an initial decomposition temperature of about
400 °C, indicating excellent thermal stability. When the temperature
was increased up to 300 °C, only a small weight loss of 10% for
both SAE-1 and SAE-2 was observed. The weight loss for both SAE-1
and SAE-2 increased with the increase of temperature, for example,
the weight loss reaches 83.15% for SAE-1 and 60.99% for SAE-2 at 800
°C. Meanwhile, it is obvious that the thermal stability of SAE-2
is better than that of SAE-1. The CONE test is an effective test for
simulating materials in real fires, which could offer main parameters,
for example, heat release rate (HRR) and total heat release (THR).
The peak value of HRR (pHRR) is one of the most important factors
for indicating the fire safety, which displays the moment when the
heat of a fire is likely to ignite adjacent objects and further propagate.
In this work, the CONE test was performed to provide data on evaluation
of the combustion properties of SAE-1 and SAE-2 by measuring the HRR,
THR, and pHRR. All information is shown in Figure b,e. From the HRR curves of SAE-1, we can
see that its values increase sharply even at the initial stage and
reaches up to 67.23 kW m–2 quickly, reflecting that
SAE-1 burns quickly after ignition. For SAE-2, its pHRR value was
measured to be 25.61 kW m–2, which is 61.9% lower
than that of SAE-1. As a result, SAE-2 shows more flame stability
than SAE-1, further suggesting that the trace amounts of Mg(OH)2 could dramatically improve the flame retardancy of SAE-2.
Moreover, such stronger flame retardancy of SAE-2 than SAE-1 is also
in good agreement with the torch test results and the HFT results.
The flammability of the SAE was studied through torch burn tests,
where the samples are exposed to direct flame produced from a butane
torch, as shown in Figure c. During the torch burn tests, the SAE samples instantly
turned gray without obvious flame by direct exposure to butane flame.
After the test, SAE-2 kept its original form and was basically not
destroyed, indicating that the SAE-2 structure did not collapse. This
result suggests that the surface magnesium oxide coating may provide
a strong protective layer and in turn serve as a barrier to prevent
heat flow and oxygen diffusion to the substrate material. Meanwhile,
SAE-2 was first decomposed into intermediate compounds and water vapor,
which is a good smoke suppressant during the combustion process. In
order to investigate the flame-retardant performance of the sample,
horizontal burn tests for both SAE-1 and SAE-2 were also carried out
to measure the flame speed. SAE-1 immediately ignited and bright flame
can be obviously observed until the combustion was completed, followed
by smoldering inside SAE-1 and no residue. The average burn rate for
pure SAE-1 was 8.39 mm min–1. After SAE-2 was ignited,
it released a yellow flame, followed by smoldering in SAE-2 and release
of a small number of fumes. The average burn rate for the SAE-2 was
6.84 mm min–1, lower than that of SAE-1, further
indicating better flame retardancy. This result could be attributed
to the coated magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles of SAE-2. It is well
known that magnesium hydroxide can be thermally decomposed into magnesium
oxide, which would provide a natural protective layer for the sample
and release water vapor to reduce the surface temperature of the material
and suppress the effect of smoke. As a result, by coating of magnesiumhydroxide nanoparticles, the flame retardancy of SAE-2 can be significantly
improved by comparison with that of SAE-1.
Figure 4
(a) TGA curves of SAE-1
and SAE-2 under nitrogen. (b) HRR curves
of pure SAE-1 and SAE-2. (c) Picture of the SAE-1 torch test (above)
and pictures of the SAE-2 torch test (below). (d) Digital photos of
horizontal burning of SAE-1 (left) and SAE-2 (right). (e) Digital
photographs of SAE-2 in the CONE tests.
(a) TGA curves of SAE-1
and SAE-2 under nitrogen. (b) HRR curves
of pure SAE-1 and SAE-2. (c) Picture of the SAE-1 torch test (above)
and pictures of the SAE-2 torch test (below). (d) Digital photos of
horizontal burning of SAE-1 (left) and SAE-2 (right). (e) Digital
photographs of SAE-2 in the CONE tests.
Hydrophilic Modification of the SAE
Taking advantages
of their low thermal conductivity, low density, and mechanical flexibility,
we believe that the as-prepared SAE sample should be ideal candidates
as solar steam generators, according to the criteria for fabrication
of these photothermal materials as mentioned in the previous literature.[37−45] However, improvement in surface hydrophilicity of SAE samples is
highly needed to this end, as its inherent hydrophobic surface could
restrict the flow of aqueous fluids. Here, we introduce a method of
permanent hydrophilic modification by treatment with benzophenone
and acrylic acid followed by irradiation with an ultraviolet (UV)
ozone lamp. As shown in Figure a, it is clear that the water droplet, which was placed on
the untreated SAE-1 surface, retains its spherical shape, implying
hydrophobic surface wettability. In contrast, it could be quickly
absorbed into the treated SAE, indicating strong hydrophilic wettability.
Furthermore, to gain a high solar light absorption, the treated SAE-1
was also coated with soot carbon (named C-SAE). For C-SAE, the FTIR
spectrum of soot carbon on the sample surface is presented in Figure
S1 (Supporting Information). To further
confirm the wettability of the C-SAE and untreated SAE-1, we recorded
the impregnation process for a water droplet using a high-speed video
camera and the results are shown in Figure b,c. The impregnation process of unmodified
SAE-1 is very slow and the droplet hardly penetrates, exhibiting strong
hydrophobic properties. In contrast, the treated C-SAE shows superhydrophilic
wettability and the droplet can be quickly and fully impregnated within
420 ms. Such superhydrophilicity of the treated C-SAE should be beneficial
for rapid water transportation, which may also provide possibility
for solar steam generation by combination with its abundant porosity
and excellent thermal insulation.[12,40]
Figure 5
(a) Schematic
of SAE-1 for modified and hydrophilic pictures. (b)
Camera photos of the droplet impregnation process on the surface of
SAE-1. (c) Camera photos of the droplet impregnation process on the
surface of the hydrophilic treated C-SAE.
(a) Schematic
of SAE-1 for modified and hydrophilic pictures. (b)
Camera photos of the droplet impregnation process on the surface of
SAE-1. (c) Camera photos of the droplet impregnation process on the
surface of the hydrophilic treated C-SAE.
SAE as an Efficient Solar Steam Generator
As shown
in Figure a,b,f, after
coating with carbon soot and surface hydrophilic modification, the
C-SAE shows a bilayered structure, for example, a black layer on its
surface for light absorption (light absorption >97% from the UV
to
IR region, Supporting Information, Figure
S2) and a porous bottom layer based on the silicon aerogel for water
transportation and thermal insulation, which is similar to the typical
bilayer-structured solar steam generators reported previously.[12,15] In this case, in order to investigate the solar steam generation
performance of the C-SAE, the time-dependent mass change of the water
being produced from steam generation was measured to calculate evaporation
rates and solar energy conversion efficiency under irradiation of
the solar simulator with different light intensities according to
our previous works.[12,40] As illustrated in Figure c, the amount of water evaporated
increases with the increase of solar energy. The evaporation rates,
which were calculated from the slope of the time-dependent mass change
curves, were found to be 1.437 kg m–2 h–1 under 1 kW m–2, 1.945 kg m–2 h–1 under 2 kW m–2, and 1.408
kg m–2 h–1 under 3 kW m–2 for the C-SAE-based solar generators under different illuminations,
indicating a superior solar evaporation performance. To verify the
light-to-heat conversion ability of samples,[42,43] we used an IR camera to monitor the time-dependent temperature change
of the C-SAE in dry state under 1, 2, and 3 sun illuminations and
the results are shown in Figure d. Obviously, it can be seen clearly from the curves
that the surface temperature of the C-SAE increases sharply under
solar irradiation, demonstrating that soot carbon can effectively
improve the conversion efficiency of solar energy (Figure d). In addition, for a given
duration of time, the surface temperature of samples is in the order
of 3 > 2 > 1 sun. To obtain the solar energy conversion efficiency
of the C-SAE, we also measured its water evaporation rate under a
dark environment, 0.234 kg m–2 h–1. It is worthwhile to note that the evaporation rate of pure water
obtained under a dark environment was subtracted to isolate the effect
of solar irradiation on the evaporation rate in all experiments,[44,45] as shown in Figure e. The energy conversion efficiency of the C-SAE was calculated to
be 82.7, 76.6, and 79.4% under an illumination of 1, 2 and 3 sun,
respectively, indicating a better steam-generation performance.
Figure 6
Steam-generation
performance and heat-localization behavior of
the SAE: (a) Camera photo of the C-SAE. (b) Camera photo of the C-SAE
on flowers. (c) Temperature change of the C-SAE surface under different
illuminations. (d) Time-dependent mass change of the C-SAE under different
illuminations. (e) Evaporation rate and solar steam efficiency of
the C-SAE under different illuminations. (f) Schematic of the C-SAE
for solar steam generation.
Steam-generation
performance and heat-localization behavior of
the SAE: (a) Camera photo of the C-SAE. (b) Camera photo of the C-SAE
on flowers. (c) Temperature change of the C-SAE surface under different
illuminations. (d) Time-dependent mass change of the C-SAE under different
illuminations. (e) Evaporation rate and solar steam efficiency of
the C-SAE under different illuminations. (f) Schematic of the C-SAE
for solar steam generation.
Conclusions
In summary, we have demonstrated an approach
for the fabrication
of multifunctional SAEs via one-pot hydrolytic condensation of silanes
followed by drying at room temperature. The as-synthesized SAE features
excellent mechanical robustness and flexibility, for example, a high
compress strength of up to 40 kPa at 75% strain can be obtained, which
has great advantages over traditional silicon aerogels usually having
poor mechanical properties. Combined with their thermal insulation
properties (a low thermal conductivity of ca. 0.02
W m –1 K –1 in air), for the first
time, such SAEs were used as a porous platform for both flame-retardant
measurement and efficient solar steam generation. By coating with
Mg(OH)2 via a facile coprecipitation method, the treated
SAE shows excellent flame retardancy with a pHRR of 25.61 kW m–2, in addition to high fire resistance and excellent
smoke suppression (see the Supporting Information, Figure S3). In addition, through a hydrophilic modification of
the SAEs, the hydrophobic surface wettability of the C-SAE changes
to hydrophilic, which makes them ideal candidates as solar steam generators.
As anticipated, the SAE-based solar steam generator shows superior
solar steam generation performance with a high energy conversion efficiency
of 82.7% under 1 sun illumination. Taking advantage of their simple
and cost-efficient manufacture and superior
mechanical robustness and flexibility, such SAEs with multifunctionalities
may have great potential for a wide variety of energy-saving applications,
especially for thermal insulation coatings with better flame retardancy
and efficient solar steam generation for desalination or freshwater
production.