| Literature DB >> 32337382 |
Ayoob Rostamzadeh1, Hossein Amini-Khoei2, Mohammad Javad Mardani Korani2, Mohammad Rahimi-Madiseh2.
Abstract
Spermatogenesis is a complicated process in which sperm is susceptible to various chemotherapy drugs such as cyclophosphamide (CP). As olive leaf extract (OLE) and its active ingredient, oleuropein, have variousantioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory properties the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of OLE and oleuropein on male reproductive function focusing antioxidative effects and histological modifications in the testes of CP-exposed mice. In order to do this, 80 NMRI male mice were divided into eight groups including control group, group received CP, group received OLE, group received oleuropein, group received OLE following CP exposure, group received oleuropein following CP exposure, group received OLE plus oleuropein and group received OLE plus oleuropein following CP exposure. In all groups CP (single dose of 100 mg/kg (, OLE (100 mg/kg for consequence 28 days) and oleuropein (100 mg/kg for consequence 28 days) were injected intraperitoneally. Moreover, testis histology, sperm parameters and serum levels of LH, FSH, MDA and antioxidant capacity were investigated. Results showed that CP caused oxidative state and abnormal changes in sperms and testes. Besides, treatments with oleuropein and OLE led to mitigate the harmful effects of CP on the male reproductive system. In conclusion, our findings showed that olive's compounds can diminish the hazardous effects of CP on spermatogenesis in mice.Entities:
Keywords: Cell biology; Cyclophosphamide; Laboratory medicine; Mice; Oleuropein; Olive leaf extract; Pathophysiology; Pharmaceutical science; Plant biology; Spermatogenesis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32337382 PMCID: PMC7176941 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Assessment of sperm morphology using aniline blue staining: A) Healthy sperm with perfectly transparent head and extended and regular tail; B) Sperm with curved midpiece abnormalities that remove the head from the tail axis and have low sperm motility; C) Sperm with amorphous (headless) abnormality that is dead and not able to fertilize the egg; D) Sperm with curved tail, cytoplasmic droplet tail and short tail that disrupt sperm motility and decrease cell viability.
Quantitative comparison (mean ± SD) of FSH, LH, antioxidant capacity and MDA levels. Samples were taken from 10 animals in each group. Data were analyzed using one0way ANOVA followed by tukey's post test. ∗∗P < 0.01 AND ∗∗∗P < 0.001compared with control group and #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 compared with CP-received group.
| Parameter | Antioxidant capacity | MDA | FSH | LH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1- Control | 297.6 ± 1.68 | 212.1 ± 2.96 | 4.68 ± 0.31 | 4.26 ± 0.1 |
| 2- CP | 183.4 ± 1.61∗∗∗ | 354.6 ± 3.47∗∗∗ | 3.11 ± 0.2 | 2.45 ± 0.16∗∗∗ |
| 3- OLE | 312.7 ± 2.11 | 2.9 ± 2.83 | 6.31 ± 0.52 | 4.31 ± 0.08 |
| 4- oleuropein | 298.2 ± 1. 49 | 210.7 ± 3.09 | 6.31 ± 0.57 | 4.28 ± 0.11 |
| 5- CP + OLE | 197.6 ± 2.36 | 319.4 ± .07## | 3.73 ± 0.25 | 3.11 ± 0.21 |
| 6- CP + oleuropein | 191.5 ± 1.11 | 329.8 ± 2.67# | 3.21 ± 0.21 | 2.81 ± 0.23 |
| 7- OLE + oleuropein | 321.6 ± 1.54 | 189.3 ± 4.24 | 7.56 ± 0.37∗∗∗ | 4.6 ± 0.24 |
| 8- CP + OLE + oleuropein | 214.4 ± 2.52 | 298.1 ± 2.62## | 4.48 ± 0.24 | 3.36 ± 0.16# |
Quantitative comparison (mean ± SD) of sperm count and motility. Samples were taken from 10 animals in each group. Data were analyzed using one0way ANOVA followed by tukey's post test.∗p < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001compared with control group and #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 compared with CP-received group.
| Parameter | Sperm Count | Sperm motility | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immotile | In situ | Progressive | ||
| 1- Control | 75.5 ± 2.21 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 42.2 ± 1.74 |
| 2- CP | 45.5 ± 1.25∗∗∗ | 9.4 ± 0.56∗∗∗ | 10.9 ± 0.52∗∗ | 32.5 ± 1.35∗ |
| 3- OLE | 84.2 ± 1.6∗ | 4 ± 0.25 | 4.4 ± 0.47 | 46 ± 1.43 |
| 4- oleuropein | 79.5 ± 1.9 | 4.5 ± 0.52 | 4.8 ± 0.46 | 44.7 ± 1.17 |
| 5- CP + OLE | 56 ± 1.94 | 7.7 ± 0.59 | 8.7 ± 0.44 | 36.7 ± 1.01 |
| 6- CP + oleuropein | 49.7 ± 1.51 | 8.8 ± 0.38 | 9.6 ± 0.26 | 34.7 ± 1.23 |
| 7- OLE + oleuropein | 86.5 ± 1.8∗∗ | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 50.5 ± 2.57 |
| 8- CP + OLE + oleuropein | 59.2 ± 1.34##,∗∗ | 7.2 ± 0.71 | 7.6 ± 0.4## | 39.8 ± 1.2# |
Quantitative comparison (mean ± SD) of viability and morphology of sperm. Samples were taken from 10 animals in each group. Data was analyzed using one0way ANOVA followed by tukey's post test. ∗∗∗P < 0.001compared with control group and ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 compared with CP-received group.
| Parameter | Viable sperm | Sperm morphology | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head abnormalities | Midpiece defects | Faulty tail | ||
| 1-Control | 61 ± 1.09 | 1.1 ± 0.23 | 2.5 ± 0.45 | 2 ± 0.36 |
| 2- CP | 36.2 ± 1.44∗∗∗ | 5.5 ± 0.42∗∗∗ | 6.2 ± 0.64∗∗∗ | 7.4 ± 0.63∗∗∗ |
| 3- OLE | 63.7 ± 3.14 | 0.8 ± 0.2## | 1.7 ± 0.36 | 1.6 ± 0.3 |
| 4- oleuropein | 62.1 ± 1.2 | 0.9 ± 0.17 | 2.1 ± 0.27 | 1.8 ± 0.35 |
| 5- CP + OLE | 40.7 ± 1.53 | 3.7 ± 0.49 | 4.9 ± 0.45 | 5.2 ± 0.51 |
| 6- CP + oleuropein | 38.4 ± 0.73 | 4.7 ± 0.33 | 5.7 ± 0.47 | 6.7 ± 0.9 |
| 7- OLE + oleuropein | 64.5 ± 1.24 | 0.4 ± 0.16 | 1.2 ± 0.29 | 1.1 ± 0.27 |
| 8- CP + OLE + oleuropein | 48.5 ± 1.33##, ∗∗ | 3 ± 0.25### | 3.8 ± 0.48## | 4.4 ± 0.54 |
Figure 2The testicular histopathological investigations in experimental groups showing different degrees of degenerative changes in testicular tissue: A) Group 1 (control); B) Group 3 (treated with OLE alone); C) Group 4 (treated with oleuropein alone); D) Group 7 (simultaneously treated with OLE and oleuropein without cyclophosphamide administration); E) group 2 (treated with cyclophosphamide alone); F) Group 5 (treated with OLE and cyclophosphamide); G) group 6 (treated with oleuropein and cyclophosphamide); H) Group 8 (simultaneously treated with OLE and oleuropein with cyclophosphamide administration). Please note that all figures are presents as supplementary file.