Literature DB >> 32337129

Effect of Montelukast on the Symptom Severity Score of Allergic Rhinitis.

Muhammad Shaheryar Ahmed Rajput1,2,3, Asif Ali Arain4, Arsalan A Rajput5, Mohammad Adeel6,7,8, Shehzad Ghaffar3, Anwar Suahil3.   

Abstract

Introduction Rhinitis is a common respiratory disorder that can be broadly defined as an inflammation of nasal mucosa. Allergic rhinitis is the most common form of chronic rhinitis characterized by one or more symptoms including sneezing, nasal itching, nasal congestion, postnasal drip, and rhinorrheaMontelukast is an antagonist to the leukotriene receptor. It is non-sedating, dosed once daily, and has a safety profile similar in adults and children, with approval down to six months of age. The purpose of the study was to see the improvement in the severity of symptoms of the patients with allergic rhinitis treated with montelukast. Methods The symptom severity score for allergic rhinitis was calculated by asking the patient to evaluate the severity of individual symptoms (sneezing, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) against the 4-point scoring scale over the last 24 hours. After explaining the scoring system to the patient, a proforma was filled before starting the treatment. A dose of 10 mg of montelukast once daily was prescribed. On the follow-up visit after four weeks of therapy, compliance was ensured and then the symptom severity score was recorded again on the proforma. The total nasal symptom severity score (TNSSS) was calculated as a sum of all four nasal symptoms. Pre- and post-treatment mean of TNSSS was compared using a t-test. P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 140 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 30 years. The minimum age was 15 years and the maximum age was 45 years. There were 93 males and 47 females. The difference between pre- and post-mean values of TNSSS was 5.82. Both pre- and post-mean of TNSSS were compared using the t-test, and P-value was significant, i.e., <0.005. Conclusions The common symptoms of allergic rhinitis evaluated in the study showed improvement in response to the treatment with montelukast. The improvement in symptom severity score was maximum in sneezing and least in rhinorrhea. In light of recent developments on neuropsychiatric adverse effects and FDA warnings, caution needs to be exercised to reserve the use of montelukast for the selected patients.
Copyright © 2020, Rajput et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allergic rhinitis; antihistamine; leukotriene inhibitor; montelukast

Year:  2020        PMID: 32337129      PMCID: PMC7182046          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

Rhinitis is a common respiratory disorder that can be broadly defined as an inflammation of nasal mucosa. Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common form of chronic rhinitis characterized by one or more symptoms including sneezing, nasal itching, nasal congestion, postnasal drip, and rhinorrhea. AR was considered as a disorder affecting the nose and nasal passages, but the evidence indicates that it is not only localized to the upper airway but it may also represent a component of a systemic disease that frequently involves the lower respiratory tract as well. This is due to a number of relationships that exist between upper and lower airways, namely physiological, functional, and immunological. For example, both the upper and lower airways are lined by ciliated epithelium with Goblet cells, which produce mucus, and they serve to clear, humidify, and warm the incoming air as it travels through the air passages [1]⁠. Evidence has shown that allergen provocation of the upper airways leads to not only a local inflammatory response but also inflammatory processes in the lower airways. This is supported by the fact that rhinitis and asthma frequently coexist [2]⁠. Worldwide, AR affects between 10% and 30% of the population, and sensitization (IgE [immunoglobulin E] antibodies) to foreign proteins in the environment is present in up to 40% of the population [3]. Many believe this to be a conservative estimate with about one-third of persons burdened with AR not seeking formal medical care [4]⁠. Symptoms may have a huge adverse influence on quality of life due to frequent interference with sleep and poor work or school performance. When approaching a patient with AR symptoms, one must distinguish AR from non-AR secondary to mechanical factors such as a septal spur. The diagnosis of AR is made clinically with history and examination, and objective testing is used for a selected group of patients. Symptomatic and topical anti-inflammatory medication is often not fully effective. Autoimmune therapy can be inconvenient and expensive [5]. Montelukast is an antagonist to the leukotriene receptor. It is non-sedating, dosed once daily, and has a safety profile similar in adults and children, with approval down to six months of age. A review of the literature establishes montelukast as a viable alternative for the treatment of AR. Its benefit is equivalent to antihistamines when used as monotherapy, but less than intranasal corticosteroids [5,6]. The purpose of this study was to see the improvement in the severity of symptoms of patients with AR treated with montelukast.

Materials and methods

The symptom severity score for AR was calculated by asking the patient to evaluate the severity of individual symptoms (sneezing, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) against the 4-point scoring scale over the last 24 hours, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Symptom severity score

ScoreSeverityDescription
0None No symptoms
1Mild Symptoms occur once or twice in the last 24 hours
2Moderate Symptoms occur once or twice every 2 to 3 hours in a day
3Severe Symptoms occur every hour in a day
The inclusion criteria included the following: (1) age 15 to 45 years, (2) history and physical examination consistent with a diagnosis of AR, and (3) symptom severity score of 6 to 12. The exclusion criteria included the following: (1) patients with polyps in the nose or a significantly displaced septum, (2) patients on chronic anti-asthma medications, (3) patients treated with systemic steroids during the last 30 days, (4) physical signs or symptoms suggestive of renal, hepatic, or cardiovascular disease, (5) lactating mothers, and (6) non-compliance. The patients visiting the outpatient department who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled for this study. Informed consent was taken from each patient after explaining the purpose and procedure of the study. A printed proforma was used to register the name, age, sex, address, and contact number of the patient. After explaining the scoring system to the patient, the proforma was filled before starting the treatment. The dose of 10-mg montelukast once daily was prescribed. On follow-up visit after four weeks of therapy, compliance was ensured and then the symptom severity score was recorded again on the proforma. Data were entered into SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and manually verified for the data entry errors. The same software was used to analyze the data. Descriptive frequencies were calculated for gender. Mean was calculated for the age and symptom severity scores of individual symptoms. The total nasal symptom severity score (TNSSS) was calculated as a sum of all four nasal symptoms. Pre- and post-treatment mean of TNSSS was compared using a t-test. P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 140 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 30 years. The minimum age was 15 years and the maximum age was 45 years. There were 93 males and 47 females. The age and gender variables are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Age and gender

Variables  Results
GenderMale93
Female47
Mean age30 years
Age range15-45 years
The mean values of pre-treatment scores for individual symptoms including sneezing, nasal obstruction, postnasal drip, and rhinorrhea were 2.38, 2.07, 2.19, and 1.61, respectively. The mean values of post-treatment scores for individual symptoms including sneezing, nasal obstruction, postnasal drip, and rhinorrhea were 0.74, 0.51, 0.71, and 0.47, respectively. The mean values of the difference between pre- and post-treatment scores for sneezing, nasal obstruction, postnasal drip, and rhinorrhea were 1.63, 1.56, 1.48, and 1.13, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3

Mean scores of individual nasal symptoms and differences before and after the treatment with montelukast

Nasal SymptomsPre-Treatment Mean ScorePost-Treatment Mean ScoreDifference
Sneezing2.380.741.63
Nasal obstruction2.070.511.56
Post nasal drip2.190.711.48
Rhinorrhea1.610.471.13
The mean TNSSS before the treatment was 8.25, which reduced to 2.43 after four weeks of treatment. The difference between pre- and post-mean values of TNSSS was 5.82. Both pre- and post-treatment means of TNSSS were compared using the t-test, and the P-value was found significant, i.e., <0.005, as shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Pre- and post-treatment TNSSS compared using the t-test

TNSSS, total nasal symptom severity score

  Pre-Treatment Post-Treatment P-Value
TNSSS mean8.252.43<0.005

Pre- and post-treatment TNSSS compared using the t-test

TNSSS, total nasal symptom severity score

Discussion

Leukotrienes act as lipid mediators and are produced by cells of inflammation, such as mast cells and basophils, during the early phase of inflammatory response. Eosinophils and macrophages are responsible for the production of leukotrienes in the late phase of inflammation [7]. C4, D4, and E4 are cysteinyl leukotrienes that play a role in the development of allergic reactions in the upper and lower airways. They are derivatives of arachidonic acid through the 5-lipoxygenase pathway. Patients with symptomatic AR have shown elevated levels of cysteinyl leukotrienes [8]. The effects of montelukast are on the function of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1, which is found in inflammatory cells, smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells in the mucosa of both the upper and the lower respiratory tracts. Montelukast is prescribed as a tablet of 10 mg in adults 15 years or older, 5 mg in children aged 6-14 years, and 4 mg in children aged 2-5 years. It is available as granules for administration to young children; the granules dissolve quickly in a glass of water. The pharmacokinetic profile allows for it to be taken once a day [9]. AR is an allergen-mediated, upper-airway inflammatory condition characterized by hyperactive respiratory mucosa, resulting in symptoms of excessive nasal secretions, sneezing, nasal itching, and congestion, with accompanying symptoms of red, itchy, watery eyes, itching of the throat and palate, and cough. AR is widely accepted as being the most common allergic disorder, but detailed statistics of its actual prevalence are lacking. Young adults are commonly affected by AR, and, consequently, it imposes a huge economic burden. The impaired quality of life due to symptoms of AR is a result of poor sleep and interruption of daily activities. AR also increases the severity of associated asthma. When montelukast was compared with placebo, the results showed improvement in disease-specific quality of life of patients with AR [10]. A randomized, placebo-controlled, 32-week study on patients with AR without the associated respiratory disease compared antihistamine treatment alone or in combination with montelukast. The results showed a gradual increase in nasal symptom improvement within six weeks of therapy with montelukast alone or in combination with an antihistamine in patients with AR [11]. Similar results have been shown in patients with AR in another study [12]. Antihistamines showed a rapid onset of action than montelukast in a study on ragweed-sensitized patients [13]. Montelukast alone improves symptoms of AR when compared with placebo [14]. Recently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued warnings about serious behavior and mood-related changes with montelukast. Serious behavior and mood-related changes have been identified with the use of montelukast in observational studies. On the basis of the findings, the risks of montelukast may outweigh the benefits in some patients, particularly when the severity of the disease is mild and can be managed with available alternative therapies [15,16]. For AR, in particular, the FDA says montelukast should be reserved for patients who have not responded adequately to other therapies or who cannot tolerate these therapies [17].

Conclusions

The common symptoms of AR evaluated in the study showed improvement in response to the treatment with montelukast. The improvement in the symptom severity score was maximum in sneezing and least in rhinorrhea. In light of recent developments on neuropsychiatric adverse effects and FDA warnings, caution needs to be exercised to reserve its use for the selected patients.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Management of asthma in adults.

Authors:  Meyer S Balter; Alan D Bell; Alan G Kaplan; Harold Kim; R Andrew McIvor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Upper airway x 1: allergic rhinitis and asthma: united disease through epithelial cells.

Authors:  A Bourdin; D Gras; I Vachier; P Chanez
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Neuropsychiatric Events Associated with Leukotriene-Modifying Agents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sharon W Y Law; Angel Y S Wong; Shweta Anand; Ian C K Wong; Esther W Chan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Use of montelukast alone or in combination with desloratadine or levocetirizine in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Maciej Ciebiada; Malgorzata Gorska-Ciebiada; Marcin Barylski; Tomasz Kmiecik; Pawel Gorski
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.467

5.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Piyush Patel; George Philip; William Yang; Robert Call; Friedrich Horak; Craig LaForce; Leen Gilles; Graigory C Garrett; S Balachandra Dass; Barbara A Knorr; Theodore F Reiss
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 6.  The role of leukotrienes in allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Marc Peters-Golden; William R Henderson
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.347

7.  Effects of montelukast on quality of life in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Cemal Cingi; Samet Ozlugedik
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Costs of hay fever in the United States in 1990.

Authors:  P McMenamin
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1994-07

Review 9.  Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?

Authors:  Kam Lun Ellis Hon; Ting Fan Leung; Alexander K C Leung
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Montelukast in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Jaime A Lagos; Gailen D Marshall
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.