| Literature DB >> 32337078 |
Derrick Silove1, Mohammed Mohsin1,2, Louis Klein1,2, Natalino De Jesus Tam1,3, Mark Dadds4, Valsamma Eapen1,2, Wietse A Tol5, Zelia da Costa1,3, Elisa Savio1,3, Rina Soares1,3, Zachary Steel1,6, Susan J Rees1,2.
Abstract
This longitudinal study indicates that exposure to the traumas of mass conflict and subsequent depressive symptoms play an important role in pathways leading to functional impairment in the postconflict period among women of child-rearing age. Our study, conducted in Timor-Leste, involved an analytic sample of 1292 women recruited at antenatal clinics in the capital and its surrounding districts. Women were re-interviewed at home 2 years later (77.3% retention). We applied the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire for conflict-related traumatic events, the WHO Violence Against Women Instrument covering the past year for intimate partner violence and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS V.2.0) to assess functional impairment. A longitudinal path analysis tested direct and indirect relationships involving past conflict-related trauma exposure, depressive symptoms measured over the two time points and functional impairment at follow-up. The prevalence of predefined clinically significant depressive symptoms diminished from 19.3% to 12.8%. Nevertheless, there was a tendency for depressive symptoms to persist over time (β=0.20; p<0.001). Follow-up depressive symptoms were associated with functional impairment (β=0.35; p<0.001). Reported conflict-related trauma occurring a minimum of 6 years earlier (β=0.23; p<0.001) and past-year physical intimate partner violence (β=0.26; p<0.001) were each associated with depressive symptoms at baseline and at follow-up. A measure of poverty specific to the context and reported health problems in the mother and infant also contributed to depressive symptoms. The findings highlight the association between ongoing trauma-related depressive symptoms and the capacity of women in the childbearing age to function in multiple areas of their lives in a postconflict country. Recognition of these relationships is important in the formulation and implementation of contemporary international recovery and development policies applied to postconflict countries. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: Cohort study; Epidemiology; Maternal health; Mental Health & Psychiatry; Public Health
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32337078 PMCID: PMC7170425 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Glob Health ISSN: 2059-7908
Figure 1Participant retention and response flow chart for the two-wave survey.
Socio-demographic and trauma-related factors, other risk factors and mental health measures at baseline and follow-up
| Socio-demographic characteristics and mental health indices | Baseline survey (n=1292) | Follow-up survey (n=1292) | Baseline vs | ||
| Number of women | Col % | Number of women | Col % | ||
| p<0.001 | |||||
| <25 years | 509 | 39.4 | 314 | 24.3 | |
| 25–29 | 466 | 36.1 | 482 | 37.3 | |
| ≥30 | 317 | 24.5 | 496 | 38.4 | |
| 26.3 (5.1) | 28.4 (5.3) | p<0.001 | |||
| p=0.053 | |||||
| None or primary school | 194 | 15.0 | 209 | 16.2 | |
| Junior/senior high school | 761 | 58.9 | 763 | 59.1 | |
| Technical college/diploma | 86 | 6.7 | 77 | 6.0 | |
| University | 251 | 19.4 | 243 | 18.8 | |
| p=0.218 | |||||
| Unemployed | 849 | 65.7 | 872 | 67.5 | |
| Paid employment/small trade/farming | 443 | 34.3 | 420 | 32.5 | |
| 100 | 7.7 | 83 | 6.4 | p=0.498 | |
| 136 | 10.5 | ||||
| 193 | 14.9 | ||||
| 5.4 (3.4) | 3.7 (2.4) | p<0.001 | |||
| p<0.001 | |||||
| No IPV or low respect/regard | 584 | 45.2 | 499 | 38.6 | |
| Severe psychological abuse | 386 | 29.9 | 295 | 22.8 | |
| Physical abuse | 322 | 24.9 | 498 | 38.6 | |
| 72 | 5.6 | 42 | 3.3 | p=0.004 | |
| 249 | 19.3 | 163 | 12.6 | p=0.003 | |
| 8.5 (4.4) | 6.4 (4.8) | p<0.001 | |||
| 20.3 (4.7) | 16.2 (4.1) | p<0.001 | |||
*Score for ongoing financial stressors was generated by adding six items, each of them scored ‘0’ for ‘no economic hardship at all’ and ‘1’ for ‘any economic hardship’. Total score was then dichotomised by assigning ‘0’ for ‘no economic hardship at all’ and ‘1’ for ‘any economic hardship’.
†Maternal ill health or physical symptoms during pregnancy at follow-up based on endorsing at least one of the listed items: bleeding, severe headache, blurred vision, convulsions, swollen hands/face, high fever, loss of consciousness, difficulty in breathing, severe weakness, severe abdominal pain, accelerated/reduced fetal movement (0=no physical symptoms; 1=one or more physical symptoms).
‡Child ill health or physical symptoms at follow-up: child suffered from any of the listed causes of sickness (No=0; Yes=1);.
§Total conflict-related traumatic events count at baseline based on the addition of each endorsed trauma item (scored 1).
¶IPV items are grouped as follows. Low respect/regard only: Examples of low respect/regard include extent to which man spends his free time with partner, consults on different household matters, shows respect, trusts partner with money, etc. Severe psychological abuse involves items in which there is threatening, intimidating and controlling behaviour such as jealousy or anger if partner talks to other men, accusations of infidelity, restrictions on meeting friends, limiting contact with family, insisting on knowing partner’s whereabouts and humiliating or threatening behaviour. Physical violence included pushing, shaking, throwing objects at partner, slapping, twisting arm, punching, kicking, dragging, strangling, burning, threatening or attacking with weapon or instrument. The typology is hierarchical, that is, the more severe categories can include characteristics in those of a lower order but not vice versa.
EDS, Edinburgh Depression Scale; IPV, Intimate partner violence; PTS, Post-traumatic stress; WHODAS, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule.
Associations of candidate variables (to be entered into path analysis) with EDS above threshold score at baseline and follow-up survey
| Candidate predictor variables | Baseline survey | Follow-up survey | ||||
| Total number | Satisfied EDS threshold ≥13.0 | Total number | Satisfied EDS threshold ≥13.0 | |||
| Number | Row % | Number | Row % | |||
| 1292 | 249 | 19.3 | 1292 | 163 | 12.6 | |
| <25 years | 509 | 109 | 21.4 | 314 | 46 | 14.6 |
| 25–29 | 466 | 94 | 20.2 | 482 | 69 | 14.3 |
| ≥30 years | 317 | 46 | 14.5 | 496 | 48 | 9.7 |
| χ2 test: p values | p=0.042 | p=0.042 | ||||
| No or low | 584 | 69 | 11.8 | 499 | 30 | 6.0 |
| Severe psychological abuse alone | 386 | 71 | 18.4 | 295 | 35 | 11.9 |
| Physical and severe psychological abuse | 322 | 109 | 33.9 | 498 | 98 | 19.7 |
| χ2 test: p values | p<0.001 | p<0.001 | ||||
| No poverty/social disadvantage | 322 | 45 | 14 | 311 | 20 | 6.4 |
| Moderate poverty/social disadvantage | 885 | 179 | 20.2 | 907 | 114 | 12.6 |
| Severe poverty/social disadvantage | 85 | 25 | 29.4 | 74 | 29 | 39.2 |
| χ2 test: p values | p=0.003 | p<0.001 | ||||
| No physical symptoms | 1156 | 135 | 11.7 | |||
| One or more physical symptoms | 136 | 28 | 20.6 | |||
| χ2 test: p values | p=0.003 | |||||
| No symptoms | 1099 | 122 | 11.1 | |||
| Presence of symptoms | 193 | 41 | 21.2 | |||
| χ2 test: p values | p<0.001 | |||||
| EDS: threshold <13.0 | 1043 | NA | 105 | 10.1 | ||
| EDS: threshold ≥13.0 | 249 | 58 | 22.3 | |||
| χ2 test: p values | p<0.001 | |||||
| EDS: threshold <13.0 (mean, SD) | 1043 | 5.1 (3.2) | 5.2 (3.3) | |||
| EDS: threshold ≥13.0 (mean, SD) | 249 | 6.6 (3.5) | 6.3 (3.9) | |||
| t-test: p values | p<0.001 | p<0.001 | ||||
*Poverty index at baseline/follow-up based on items inquiring into education (none to high-school level=1; technical/university level=0), employment (unemployed=1; employed=0) and ongoing economic hardship (no economic hardship=0; any economic hardship=1), scored 0–3 (0=no poverty; 1=moderate poverty; 2,3=severe poverty), a higher score representing greater ongoing economic hardship. Economic hardship score generated by adding six items related to ongoing financial stressors, each of them scored ‘0’ for ‘no economic hardship at all’ and ‘1’ for ‘any economic hardship’. Total score was then dichotomised by assigning of ‘0’ for ‘no economic hardship at all’ and ‘1’ for ‘any economic hardship’.
EDS, Edinburgh Depression Scale; IPV, intimate partner violence; NA, not applicable; TE, traumatic effect.
Figure 2Path model showing statistically significant direct pathways with standardised coefficients.
Path model: standardised direct and indirect effects of age, poverty, family conflict, total conflict-related trauma events, IPV leading to depressive symptoms and functional impairment, at baseline and follow-up
| Candidate predictor variables | Depressive symptoms at baseline | Depressive symptoms at follow-up | Functional impairment at follow-up | |||
| Coefficient (β) | P values | Coefficient (β) | P values | Coefficient (β) | P values | |
| Age at baseline | −0.06 | p=0.016 | ||||
| Poverty index at baseline | 0.10 | p<0.001 | ||||
| Total traumatic event counts at baseline | 0.23 | p<0.001 | 0.07 | p=0.006 | ( | p<0.001 |
| IPV at baseline | 0.26 | p<0.001 | ||||
| Depressive symptoms at baseline (total score) | 0.20 | p<0.001 | 0.06 | p=0.023 | ||
| Poverty index | 0.14 | p<0.001 | 0.07 | p=0.009 | ||
| IPV | 0.14 | p<0.001 | ( | p<0.001 | ||
| Maternal ill health during pregnancy | ( | p<0.001 | 0.14 | p<0.001 | ||
| Child ill health | 0.08 | p=0.001 | ( | p=0.002 | ||
| Depressive symptoms at follow-up (total score) | NA | 0.35 | p<0.001 | |||
| χ2 test of model fit | 23.92; df=24; p=0.466 | |||||
| RMSEA (90% CI of RMSEA) | 0.000 (0.000–0.022) | |||||
| CFI | 1.00 | |||||
| TLI | 1.00 | |||||
| SRMR | 0.014 | |||||
All the variables included in the analyses are based on observed data. Only significant estimates are included in the table.
*Indirect significant effects are presented inside bracket in italics.
CFI, Comparative Fit Index; IPV, intimate partner violence; NA, not applicable; RMSEA, Root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardised root mean square residual; TLI, Tucker–Lewis Index.