| Literature DB >> 32336989 |
Michela Cecchin1, Silvia Berteotti1, Stefania Paltrinieri1, Ivano Vigliante2, Barbara Iadarola1, Barbara Giovannone1, Massimo E Maffei2, Massimo Delledonne1, Matteo Ballottari1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nannochloropsis gaditana is a photosynthetic unicellular microalgae considered one of the most interesting marine algae to produce biofuels and food additive due to its rapid growth rate and high lipid accumulation. Although microalgae are attractive platforms for solar energy bioconversion, the overall efficiency of photosynthesis is reduced due to the steep light gradient in photobioreactors. Moreover, accumulation of lipids in microalgae for biofuels production is usually induced in a two-phase cultivation process by nutrient starvation, with additional time and costs associated. In this work, a biotechnological approach was directed for the isolation of strains with improved light penetration in photobioreactor combined with increased lipids productivity.Entities:
Keywords: Biofuel; Microalgae; Nannochloropsis; Palmitic acid; Photosynthesis; Stearic acid
Year: 2020 PMID: 32336989 PMCID: PMC7175523 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-01718-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Chlorophylls per cell and Nile red staining of mutated strains. Chlorophyll content per cell (a) and Nile red fluorescence per cell (b) were normalized to the WT case. Errors are reported as standard deviation (n = 3), significantly different values are marked with * if p < 0.05 and ** if p < 0.01, as determined by unpaired two-sample t test (n = 3). In the case of sample marked with °p-value of 0.0597 was obtained
Pigment analysis of WT and e8 mutant strain
| Chl/cell (%) | chl | Chl/car | Vio | Vau | Anthera | Cantha | Zea | β-car | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 100.0% | 100.00 | 2.31 | 20.51 | 12.17 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.21 | 3.27 |
| 13.8% | 5.04 | 0.17 | 1.11 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.31 | |
| 69.6%* | 100.00 | 2.17 | 19.14 | 13.37 | 3.64 | 1.03 | 5.90* | 2.97 | |
| 2.5% |
Chlorophyll content per cell (Chl/cell) was set to 100% in the case of WT. The concentration of pigments in pmol was determined by HPLC and normalized to 100 pmol of chlorophyll a (Chl). Violaxanthin: vio, vaucheriaxanthin: vau, β-carotene: β-Car, antheraxanthin: anthera, zeaxanthin: zea, canthaxanthin: cantha. Standard deviations (s.d.) are reported for the different values (n = 5 for Chl/cell values, n = 3 for the other values). Significantly different values are marked with * if p < 0.05, as determined by unpaired two-sample t-test (n = 3)
Fig. 2PSII functional antenna size and PSII maximum quantum yield. a Fluorescence induction kinetics of PSII antenna size of wild type and selected mutant. b PSII functional antenna size expressed as the reciprocal of the time required to reach 2/3 of the maximum fluorescence emission, τ2/3−1(%). c PSII maximum quantum yield calculated as (FM-F0)/FM from basal chlorophyll fluorescence in the dark (F0) and maximum chlorophyll fluorescence induced by a saturating pulse (FM). The statistical analysis of the results obtained was performed by unpaired two-sample t-test (n = 4, no statistically significant difference being p-value = 0.09 for PSII functional antenna size and p = 0.78 for Fv/Fm values)
Fig. 3Photosynthetic parameters of e8 mutant compared to WT. a Net oxygen production of wild type and e8 mutant strain normalized to chlorophyll content, measured at different actinic light intensities. Experimental data were fitted with hyperbolic function. b Dark respiration rate normalized to cell content. c Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ) formation and relaxation in wild type and e8 mutated strain, actinic light 1500 μmol photons m−2 s−1. d Proton motive force (pmf) for wild type (WT) and e8 obtained by electrochromic shift measurement (ECS) at 1000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and normalized to the chlorophyll content. Errors are reported as standard deviation, the statistical significance of differences between WT and e8 is indicated as * (p < 0.05), as determined by unpaired two-sample t-test (n = 4)
Fig. 4Biomass and lipid productivity of wild type and e8 mutant. a Growth curves of WT and e8 mutant obtained measuring the optical density at 720 nm. b Maximum daily productivity in terms of gr L−1 day−1. c Dry weight at the end of the growth curve (g/L). d, e FAME content in terms of mg of lipids per liters of culture (d) or mg of lipids per gram of dry weight (e). f FAME productivity in terms of mg of lipids per liters of culture per day. g Acyl chain composition of lipid fraction from WT and e8 mutant. Errors are reported as standard deviation, significantly different values are marked with * if p < 0.05 and ** if p < 0.01, as determined by unpaired two-sample t-test (n = 3)
Fig. 5Transmittance and light penetration in photobioreactors. Transmittance (a) and irradiances (b) at different layer of photobioreactors were calculated considering the absorption spectra of whole cells, the incident light intensity (400 µmol photons m−2s−1) and the concentration of chlorophyll at exponential phase in photobioreactors. Error bars are reported as standard deviation (n = 3)
Statistics of the mutations found in e8 mutant strain
| Total SNPs | Predicted effect | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Moderate | High | Other | |
| 240 | 36 | 80 | 1 | 123SNPs |
Total number of SNPs found is reported in the first column. The predicted effect of mutations are reported according to SNPeff software: HIGH is for mutation probably causing protein truncation, loss of function or triggering nonsense-mediated decay, Moderate are non-disruptive variants that might change protein effectiveness and LOW are mutations harmless or unlikely to change protein behavior. SNPs with predicted non-coding variants or variants affecting non-coding genes, where predictions are difficult or there is no evidence of impact were not considered: the number of remaining SNPs is reported in the last column (Other)