| Literature DB >> 32336935 |
Ronnie N Glud1,2,3, Peter Berg4, Henrik Stahl2,5, Andrew Hume2, Morten Larsen1,2, Bradley D Eyre6, Perran L M Cook7.
Abstract
Based on in situ micropn>rofiles, chamber incubations and eddy covEntities:
Keywords: Carbon cycle; Denitrification; Eddy covariance; In situ measurements; Loch Etive; Nutrient regeneration; Oxygen exchange
Year: 2016 PMID: 32336935 PMCID: PMC7154884 DOI: 10.1007/s10498-016-9300-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aquat Geochem ISSN: 1380-6165 Impact factor: 1.517
Fig. 1a Map showing the location of Loch Etive in West Scotland, UK. b An enlargement of Loch Etive including the locations of the major sills at Connel Narrows and Bonawe enclosing the study site in Airds Bay. c Bathymetry of Loch Etive along the deepest points. a, b is modified from Inoue et al. (2011), while c is modified from Overnell et al. (2002)
Fig. 2a One typical in situ image (89 × 63 cm) of the seabed at the study site showing a high density of arms from A. filiformis that are extending from the sediment surface. b A 3D, CT scan of burrow structures in an intact block of sediment containing actively ventilating brittle stars at natural densities. c One typical black-and-white image selected from a 30-h time series of images at the sediment water interface obtained at a frequency of 5 min. The image was obtained through a transparent O2 optode, and the central cavity with the disc and arms extending to the left and right from a single specimen of A. filiformis can be observed. d–f depict three selected images of the O2 distribution within and around the ventilated burrow system. One arm is used to channel air-saturated water into the central cavity while O2-depleted water is exhaled to the right (indicated by arrows). g The O2 concentration within the central cavity as extracted from 25 h of continuous O2 images. The full movie on animal activity in black-and-white and the concurrent O2 dynamics is available in the supplementary material
Fig. 3a–d Typical O2 microprofiles as measured by the transecting profiling instrument. The estimated sediment surface as reflected by a slight shift in the concentration slope is indicated by the thin horizontal line. Many profiles showed clear signs of irrigation with O2 peaks deep within the sediment presumably penetrating irrigated burrows (a, d) or larger cavities (b). e, f depict typical microprofiles of NO3 − distribution at the sediment–water interface. Some profiles reveal intense NO3 − production (nitrification) at the oxic surface (e–h). As for O2, irrigation clearly transported NO3 − deep into burrows (e, h) or larger cavities (f) of the sediment
Fig. 4Changes in O2, DIC and nutrient concentrations within a single in situ chamber incubation conducted at 5 November 2008 at 65 m water depth (deployment 6). Flux rates were derived from linear approximations of the concentration changes and by accounting for the enclosed volume of water
Total solute exchange rates (mmol m−2 day−1) as derived by in situ chamber incubations
| Deployment | O2 | DIC* | NO3 − | NH4 + | PO4 3− | DSi** | N2*** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −16.8 | 19.0 | −0.03 | 0.41 | 0.83 | – | 1.67 |
| 2 | −16.6 | 19.0 | −1.00 | 0.18 | 0.40 | – | 0.61 |
| 3 | −14.1 | 12.8 | −0.21 | 0.21 | 0.08 | – | 1.44 |
| 4 | −10.4 | 11.2 | −0.12 | 0.85 | 0.12 | – | 0.38 |
| 6 | −16.8 | 17.2 | −1.05 | 0.43 | 0.20 | 3.60 | – |
| 7 | −14.9 | 13.5 | −0.20 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 2.98 | – |
| Average | −14.9 ± 2.5 | 15.5 ± 3.4 | −0.43 ± 0.42 | 0.40 ± 0.22 | 0.29 ± 0.26 | 3.29 ± 0.31 | 1.02 ± 0.54 |
* Dissolved inorganic carbon
** Dissolved silicate
*** Note that for converting the N2 flux into N equivalents this value must be multiplied by 2
Fig. 5Changes in N2 within four separate in situ chamber incubations as derived from overall changes in the measured N2–Ar ratio. Samples containing small bubbles after sampling or storage were discarded. Flux rates were derived from linear approximations of the concentration changes accounting for the enclosed volume of water
Fig. 6a Flow rates as derived by the horizontal flow components measured by the ADV of the eddy tripod during a 42-h-long deployment. Values are averages of 14.5 min of recording. b The concurrent O2 exchange rates as derived by eddy covariance in bursts of 14.5 min. The example represents a deployment from 5 to 6 November 2008 at 68 m, and a parallel data set from 7 to 10 November 2008 at 55 m has been presented previously (Holtappels et al. 2013)
Fig. 7Benthic O2 exchange as resolved by three different in situ approaches. The error bars represent the standard deviation (For EOE the SE amounted to 0.5 mmol m−2 day−1)